View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vulko
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
vulko wrote:
Sigma AF 50mm 1.4 EX DG is very nice. Though its an AF lens, I just love that smooth bokeh, great contrast and colors. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
N
Joined: 01 Feb 2010 Posts: 32 Location: Sintra, Portugal
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
N wrote:
maybe...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Let's see some love for the humble Helios 44M,
This is a mass produced, cheap and cheerful lens from a factory run under a Communist regime that still to this day looks fresh and modern, in non plastic way, it still looks like a quality lens.
It's also very tactile, it's nicely finished and has a smooth operation, although it does weigh as much as some modern telephoto lenses.
The 44-2 might have the edge optically, any number of lenses are rarer, more exclusive and better performers. But the Helios 44 M did EXACTLY what it was designed to do, and still does it.
It's a design classic. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
N wrote: |
maybe...
|
Yes! This or the Zeiss 50/1.4 Planar T* as ZF/ZS/ZE version with chrome ring |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blackrubystudio
Joined: 26 May 2010 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
blackrubystudio wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
Let's see some love for the humble Helios 44M,
This is a mass produced, cheap and cheerful lens from a factory run under a Communist regime that still to this day looks fresh and modern, in non plastic way, it still looks like a quality lens.
It's also very tactile, it's nicely finished and has a smooth operation, although it does weigh as much as some modern telephoto lenses.
The 44-2 might have the edge optically, any number of lenses are rarer, more exclusive and better performers. But the Helios 44 M did EXACTLY what it was designed to do, and still does it.
It's a design classic. |
Exactly my thought. Long live the Helios 44M! _________________ - Black Ruby -
_____________
Canon EOS 300D, Canon EOS 7D
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS, Canon EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS, Canon EF 50mm f1.8 II, Canon EF-S 15-85 IS USM
Helios 44M 58mm f2, Revuenon Special 135mm f2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
N wrote: |
maybe...
|
Oh yes, that's a beauty indeed - a modern one.
Another lens, with completely looks that I also like is that one:
CZJ Biotar 2/58 _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5043 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
I like J8 because it is so tiny and still powerful.
_________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Tomioka Yashinon 55/1.2 _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
I'm really torn between two lovers in this instance - to my eyes, both are equally beautiful...
Yashica Auto Yashinon 1:1.8 f/5.5cm (M42)
Carl Zeiss Ultron 1:1.8 f/50mm (M42)
_________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
This is one of my favorite five - not much to look at:
|
Scheimpflug wrote: |
What lens is that, Woodrim? |
Attila wrote: |
Looks a Vivitar 28mm f1.9 made by Tokina. |
fish4570 wrote: |
Har! Off-topic. Off with his head! |
Woodrim - Better find a teleconverter, and quick! _________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Oh yes, the Ultron is gorgeous!! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
That black Voigtlander is an ebon beauty ... _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robertro
Joined: 14 May 2009 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:08 pm Post subject: The simple Zuiko 50mm f1.8 |
|
|
robertro wrote:
I looked through my lenses and pondered this question....
The Canon FL 58 is slim, glossy, with the counterpoint of a matte silver preset aperture ring, but the Minolta 58mm has a wonderful chunky form at the front end....
The Contax Zeiss Planar 50mm looks just right in basic black, but the Rolleiflex Zeiss Planar 50mm is the perfect classic with its silver accents...
But on the camera sits a modest Olympus Zuiko 50mm, a masterpiece of elegant miniature design...today it is the winner!
And the Konica and Vivitar macro grumble in the background ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
N
Joined: 01 Feb 2010 Posts: 32 Location: Sintra, Portugal
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:09 pm Post subject: Re: The simple Zuiko 50mm f1.8 |
|
|
N wrote:
robertro wrote: |
I looked through my lenses and pondered this question....
The Canon FL 58 is slim, glossy, with the counterpoint of a matte silver preset aperture ring, but the Minolta 58mm has a wonderful chunky form at the front end....
|
that rokkor is also drooling material |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Robertro, you've got some nice glass there! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robertro
Joined: 14 May 2009 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:32 pm Post subject: too many MF lenses! |
|
|
robertro wrote:
Don't tell my wife! '' Must reduce!
LucisPictor wrote: |
Robertro, you've got some nice glass there! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke cern
Joined: 09 May 2010 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:00 pm Post subject: helios |
|
|
luke cern wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
Let's see some love for the humble Helios 44M,
This is a mass produced, cheap and cheerful lens from a factory run under a Communist regime that still to this day looks fresh and modern, in non plastic way, it still looks like a quality lens.
It's also very tactile, it's nicely finished and has a smooth operation, although it does weigh as much as some modern telephoto lenses.
The 44-2 might have the edge optically, any number of lenses are rarer, more exclusive and better performers. But the Helios 44 M did EXACTLY what it was designed to do, and still does it.
It's a design classic. |
couldn't agree more. I just don't understand why its so cheaply available and ranks so low in collections. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:04 pm Post subject: Re: helios |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
luke cern wrote: |
Lloydy wrote: |
Let's see some love for the humble Helios 44M,
This is a mass produced, cheap and cheerful lens from a factory run under a Communist regime that still to this day looks fresh and modern, in non plastic way, it still looks like a quality lens.
It's also very tactile, it's nicely finished and has a smooth operation, although it does weigh as much as some modern telephoto lenses.
The 44-2 might have the edge optically, any number of lenses are rarer, more exclusive and better performers. But the Helios 44 M did EXACTLY what it was designed to do, and still does it.
It's a design classic. |
couldn't agree more. I just don't understand why its so cheaply available and ranks so low in collections. |
Because there are so many of them about, I know where three are at the moment, all cheap and in decent condition. But I have two already! _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
More so perhaps than the body, the concave front element of the Carl Zeiss Ultron 50/1.8 makes it, somehow, really beautiful
_________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 416 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
I am generally a fan of the look of fast, short teles - but there are a few 50's that give the 'block of glass' impression. If I had a Canon 50/0.95 yet, I'd definitely consider it, but perhaps even more unique to me is the Minolta 58/1.2 Rokkor with a preference for the earlier knurled metal grip.
These two beaut's were restored and converted for use on A-mount by a fellow named Shao Zhang, I was lucky enough to have the opportunity to purchase one for a very fair price and have used the 58 extensively since for it's bokeh, optical quality, general low light performance and superficially, the look and smooth glide of the wide focus grip.
K _________________ kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TBaker
Joined: 02 Dec 2009 Posts: 344 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TBaker wrote:
SMC Tak 50 1.4. To bad it doesn't so infinity any more since going to 5D MKII. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
my instinct says S-M-C Takumar 1.4/50, for me THE 'archetype' of a lens
but how about the Auto Takumar f2/50mm?
_________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
taylor_h
Joined: 21 May 2010 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
taylor_h wrote:
Loving the chrome ring and matte black finish on the Mamiya-Sekor 2/50
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
The Primoplan 58mm f/1.9 is a classic beauty in alu finish and subtle red details:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
rawhead wrote: |
More so perhaps than the body, the concave front element of the Carl Zeiss Ultron 50/1.8 makes it, somehow, really beautiful :-) |
Agreed, although I don't have this lens. =) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|