Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Smallest 35mm Full Frame SLR Lens (classic MF of course)
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fujita is really small! A returning to previous subject a bit:

Lineup on the second photo from left to right:
E. Ludwig Anastigmat-Victar 2.9/50mm
CZJ Tessar 3.5/50mm
E. Ludwig Meritar early version 2.9/50mm
Industar-50-3 3.5/50mm


Sorry for messy samples - i didn't manage to clean yet. Well in fact Industar is the biggest, but it closes very deep so it become the thinest (opposite story with Victar). Industar is the only M42, other three are Exakta mounts.






PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy to beat...

How about the Zeiss S-Planar 32mm, just 1.5" in size


or a CZJ 4.5/20mm Planar, covers 4x5" and is just 1" in size:


Like it even smaller? CZJ Mikrotar 10mm, also covers 4x5"


and to balance the politics out a bit (LOL) , a Bausch&Lomb Micro Tessar 10mm (also for 4x5")


Ok, ok, all are macro lenses, but that was not the question...


PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leave it to Klaus to bring out the big... er tiny guns. Laughing
This is a great, odd thread!


PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

These macro lenses look like a photographers small change!! Shocked


PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DSG wrote:
I wonder what the smallest 135mm lens is for 35mm format?
I just picked up a dinky little Vivitar 135mm f2.8 preset lens with a T mount and a wonderful 15 blade Iris that I think may be a good candidate.
Its only 85mm long and 60mm diameter.


Its true these are small but they are all slower than my Vivitar so perhaps I should really have asked: "I wonder what the smallest 135mm f2.8 lens is for 35mm format?


PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pancolart wrote:
I know of Industar. It looks very ugly though


UGLY? Shocked Shocked Shocked

CarbonR wrote:
Asahi Kogaku Takumar 50/3.5, approximatively the same size of the industar 50-2, but heavier (158g vs 68g) and full chrome :



Was that taken with an Industar Macro lens?


PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was primarily interested in the smallest m42 "normal" lenses to put on M42 bodies. But it's nice to see all others strange tiny fellows.


PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Three of the Seven 135mm Dwarfs with their personal bodyguards...




PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

VERY OT here: my Voigtländer Collinear.



PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hee, hee, OK I'll join that party too! Two 30mm lensies..

Carl Zeiss Jena 110mm Protar


Rodenstock Apo Ronar 150mm


PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Klaus,

I have that Protar V too, in dialset Compur that I used for the picture of the Sydney Harbour Bridge Smile


PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is a great lens - isn't it?! And that shot is a really great one!


PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The smallest normal lens I have is the DKL mount (m42 with adapter) Voigtlander Color-Skopar-x 50/2.8


Takes some ok pics, though


PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Farside wrote:
Takes some ok pics, though


Is that Pat Shortt's pub in Castlemartyr?


PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Is that Pat Shortt's pub in Castlemartyr?

Hardly. I hear some of the acts in it are funny.


PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kds315* wrote:
It is a great lens - isn't it?! And that shot is a really great one!


Thanks Klaus; I will see if I can get the colour version scanned and uploaded some time.


PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seele wrote:
VERY OT here: my Voigtländer Collinear.



Wow! That one is so small, they could hardly find a place to put the engravings! Shocked Very Happy

What type of camera is it from, and is it still usable?


PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The cement layers have really deteriorated and rendered it unusable. You should be able to make out the markings saying it is a Collinear Series III, No.00, focal length 68mm and can cover 2 1/2" X 3 1/2" at f/16.


PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Topic pretty much lost it's track but anyway here another midget, having useful flange distance around 46mm.



PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This Belar lens should be an enlarging lens rather than a camera lens.


PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As i said this topic ran out of course thus wider range of lenses are popping out. Just taken Belar out on my balcony, it's murky day with rain pouring. Handheld so obvious TS effects appeared. Wide-open, unprocessed. Behaves like any other 55mm lens on my Pentax K10D.