View previous topic :: View next topic |
Marketplace replacement |
Auction software |
|
5% |
[ 3 ] |
Classified ads |
|
27% |
[ 16 ] |
Webshop |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
No changes |
|
67% |
[ 40 ] |
|
Total Votes : 59 |
|
Author |
Message |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
lauge wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
aleksanderpolo wrote: |
I agree with rawhead that tags should be implemented. This way we can continue to browse through everything as usual. And if someone want to narrow down to a specific brand, or mount, it can be done easily too. |
Yes, only problem people use it or not. |
I have experience with another forum that tried to force people to use tags in subjects. They stopped that probably because the mods spent too much time correcting subjects from people who didn't knew the rules. It's a very good idea to tag the subject but it have apparent flaws, the only way I can see improvements is if there is checkboxes for some standard tags (FS/WTB etc.) when creating new topic so the use don't have to write it them self. |
Yes. No mod time to push people to use it. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11058 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Attila wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
What bugs me about the current system is that I'm often too late to see lenses being offered. It seems the first lucky person to send a PM gets the lens and nobody else can bid for it.
Some people can't be on line as often or at the same time as others. At present it's the law of the jungle and I think we could make it fairer to all. |
This is hard ... I have no idea how can be more fair. Now is similar than real shop who entry first that buyer will take it , this is fair I think. |
Timing of for-sale post can determine to where in the world lens ships.
How about throwing a no-price sale?
A no-price sale can be "all offers considered", "sale ends next week."
Plenty time for everybody to offer. After week, buyer decides winner; maybe on friendship or on convenience not only on high bid or first offer. Maybe no sale, or future sale.
If buyer wants to toss offers in a hat, mix, and draw the winning offer, . _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Seller can pick up right buyer or friend etc, no rule for first offer. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
larsr
Joined: 25 Jun 2009 Posts: 272 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
larsr wrote:
The only thing that irritates me with the Marketplace is that sometimes I can't distinguish "to buy" and "to sell" adverts from one another. Other forums have dealt with the problem by splitting into "BUY" and "SELL" forums which, I think, clarifies purpose really, really well. That way, you don't have to put WTB or WTS or worry if you forget it or not.
Other than that, I strongly disagree with sub-categorizing the Marketplace any further - as long as the subject lines are clear to interpret, ie: "FS: Pentacon 135/2.8 (M42) from UK" or smth..
My 0.02€ _________________ Lars
Bodies:
DSLR: Nikon D200
SLR: Nikon FA, Pentax Spotmatic SPII, Zeiss Ikon Icarex 35TM
35mm: Voigtl�nder Vitoret
Nikkor MF
24/2.8K AI'd, 28/2.8 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 Micro, 35-70/3.5 AIS, 85/1.8K AI'd, 100/2.8 Series E, 105/2.5 AI, 105/2.5 AIS, 135/3.5 AI, Nikkor 180/2.8 ED AIS, 200/4-Q AI'd, 300/4.5-H AI'd
M42
Misc: Vivitar 28/2.5, Chinon 28/2.8, Cosina Auto Cosinon 50/1.8, Revue Auto Revuenon 50/1.8, Mamiya 50/2, Auto Flex 55/1.7, Cosina Cosinon 135/2.8 MC, Vivitar 135/2.8, Petri 200/3.5 CC Auto
Zeiss: Carl Zeiss (Ikon) Tessar 50/2.8, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, CZJ Pancolar Electric 50/1.8 MC, CZJ Biotar 58/2 T, CZJ Sonnar MC S 135/3.5
Asahi-Pentax: SMC-Takumar 55/1.8, Super-Takumar 105/2.8, SMC-Takumar 135/3.5
USSR: Mir-1 37/2.8 (1958 GP), Helios 44-2 58/2
Pentacon/Meyer: Pentacon 29/2.8 MC, Pentacon 50/1.8 MC Electric, Meyer G�rlitz Oreston 50/1.8, Meyer G�rlitz Orestor 135/2.8, Pentacon 200/4
Nikkor AF
50/1.8 D, 60/2.8 Micro, 55-200/4-5.6 G VR, 70-300/4-5.6 ED, 18-70/3.5-4.5 G
Wantlist
Nikkor 105/1.8, Nikkor 135/2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luke cern
Joined: 09 May 2010 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luke cern wrote:
larsr wrote: |
The only thing that irritates me with the Marketplace is that sometimes I can't distinguish "to buy" and "to sell" adverts from one another. Other forums have dealt with the problem by splitting into "BUY" and "SELL" forums which, I think, clarifies purpose really, really well. That way, you don't have to put WTB or WTS or worry if you forget it or not.
Other than that, I strongly disagree with sub-categorizing the Marketplace any further - as long as the subject lines are clear to interpret, ie: "FS: Pentacon 135/2.8 (M42) from UK" or smth..
My 0.02€ |
I agree. Buy and sell separately. But a sell must be a "SELL", not a method of feeling the market! Other forums ban open negotiation (That's what Private Messages are for), or comments about whether the price is fair (Efficient markets ensure that a fair price is reached based on supply and demand. If an item is overpriced and oversupplied the item simply won't sell and the seller will make an adjustment). When a deal is done, then the final part of the thread should announce SOLD. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1443 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
1. Create separate sections for BUY and SELL.
Members can easily find their way to the proper section for their interests.
2. Do not allow comments posted to a thread to move it to the top.
This keeps things on a more even keel, and prevents people with gear
to buy or sell from moving their post to the top of the list.
A simple search of the section in question will give buyers or sellers
all they need to know, and prevents unfair 'bumping' of a thread.
3. Standardize the subject lines, such as [FS] to mean For sale, [FT]
to mean For Trade, [US] to mean United States, [EU] to mean European
countries, [CA] to mean Canada, [CON US] to mean continental
United States, etc. Actual item is also included in the Subject line.
[FA] can mean For Auction.
4. Create a standardized format for posts, such as:
WHAT: Item is described here, in full detail.
Don't skimp on details, either. The more you tell, the more we'll be able
to decide if we want to make a deal with you.
WHY: Why are you selling/trading/buying?
Example: I just landed a Canon 28-135 IS USM lens which was sold out of
a kit package. The camera buyer didn't want the lens from the kit, so he
offered it up for sale. I bought it.
DETAILS: Everything you'd like to know or should tell. Include clear pictures, if appropriate.
This is the time to mention your personal nitpicks about the item,
or simply tell everyone about the one or two cosmetic issues you've had
with the item. Is function affected? Are the optics affected? Are you
simply being too much of a perfectionist? Say it all, and don't hold back.
PAYMENT: Will you accept PayPal, or do you require other means of payment?
If you will accept PayPal for the price, but insist on collecting the additional
percentage fees of the Paypal service, then simply say so.
SHIPPING: Will you require additional monies for shipping, or is your price/offer all-inclusive?
Be sure to tell others if you will impose an additional charge for shipping
costs. This is especially important when making arrangements between
different countries, and can have a huge impact on total shipping costs.
5. NEVER remove listing prices!
No matter what, this is an excellent indicator of what any given item is worth
in the world market. It's also a superb way for newcomers to get a good
idea of what any given item is worth, or at least give them an idea of
what they should be willing to offer.
6. ALWAYS lock the threads when an item has sold, traded, or transferred.
If there is an option for a poster to lock their threads due to a sale/trade/
purchase or other reason, this should be implemented immediately
on this forum. This option gives the poster a way to immediately
announce that any given item is no longer for sale/trade, while preserving
the details and prices of the transaction. _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
Too many rules.
There's also a number of problems. For example:- Does a "For Trade" post go in the "For Sale" section or the "Wanted" section?
- If comments ("bumping") are not allowed, how will a still-for-sale item stay afloat when other items above it are sold? (Is bumping even a problem here?)
- Country descriptions in the subject ([US], [EU], etc) can be misleading. Is this where the seller is from, where they ship to, or what currency they take? How can you distinguish between a US seller who sells only to the US, vs. a US seller who sells worldwide, vs a seller from Ecuador who takes US dollars?
- Does "[FS][FT][CON US][NIKON][AF][TELE][ZOOM][LENS][USED][<$100][US$][PayPal][FreeShip] Tamron 300/5.6" as a post title really help make things any more clear, or does it just make the forum a pain to read?
- If we lock threads after the item sells, how can buyers report back with feedback or samples? What if the buyer backs out, or returns the item? Won't this system essentially require moderator attention for every single thread in the Marketplace section?
Seems to me like the current system is working. If any piece of information is missing, potential buyers (or any other helpful member) can easily ask for the missing information. It doesn't require moderator attention, it doesn't require users to learn a bunch of etiquette, and it provides a lot of flexibility. It also makes new users immediately obvious, which helps keep other members from getting burned on shady deals. _________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
larsr
Joined: 25 Jun 2009 Posts: 272 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
larsr wrote:
Scheimpflug wrote: |
Too many rules. :shock: :D
|
I definitely agree.
Scheimpflug wrote: |
There's also a number of problems. For example:- Does a "For Trade" post go in the "For Sale" section or the "Wanted" section?
|
This could be resolved by splitting into "TO BUY", "TO SELL" and "TO TRADE" sections, but nothing more.
Scheimpflug wrote: |
If comments ("bumping") are not allowed, how will a still-for-sale item stay afloat when other items above it are sold? (Is bumping even a problem here?)
|
This is merely a problem with the inhabitants of the forum. Sadly, this is a side-effect of each and every forum - either the topics are being bumped far too often for no apparent reason, or the bumping is happening because people are arguing over the asking price, location, sales terms or something else.
I vote for commenting to be allowed, but if possible within the forum software, only by him/her who originally started the topic. This way, commeting will be minimum. Anyway, if you don't agree with the terms or prices or whatever - don't waste your time arguing over shit like that - it's the seller who loses, and it's his/her problem if the goods don't sell. It's his/her responsibility to make the offering stand out and be interesting. If he/she fails, then he/she fails. End game.
Scheimpflug wrote: |
Country descriptions in the subject ([US], [EU], etc) can be misleading. Is this where the seller is from, where they ship to, or what currency they take? How can you distinguish between a US seller who sells only to the US, vs. a US seller who sells worldwide, vs a seller from Ecuador who takes US dollars?
Does "[FS][FT][CON US][NIKON][AF][TELE][ZOOM][LENS][USED][<$100][US$][PayPal][FreeShip] Tamron 300/5.6" as a post title really help make things any more clear, or does it just make the forum a pain to read?
|
It makes the forum a horrible pain to read. And nobody in their right mind will REMEMBER the "tags" as they are written. Imagine this:
I want to sell a Nikkor lens, that's near mint and I want to let it go for next to nothing, but only in Finland or the EU. I also consider it cheap. I'm willing to accept USD or EUR currencies, but only in Paypal. And as it happens, I've already made a deal in eBay and the sale is pending payment from someone. Along the way, I've also forgotten the "official" required "tags". So I end up with the following.
[SALE][TRADE][MOUNT:F][TYPE:AIS][FINLAND-EUROPE][NEAR-MINT][CHEAP][USD-OR-EUR][PAYPAL][EBAY][PENDING] Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED
Frankly, I'd be irritated to try and read stuff like that. The way thead subjects are written at the moment, is perfectly fine. I just want to see threads split into BUY/SELL/TRADE subforums to clarify what the motive for the thread is.
Scheimpflug wrote: |
If we lock threads after the item sells, how can buyers report back with feedback or samples? What if the buyer backs out, or returns the item?
|
This should be dealt with in the "Buyer/seller experiences feedback"-forum, where people now can, and could in the future, describe good or bad transactions between forum members. That way, the signal-to-noise ratio would stay good in the sales topics themself, and drive the nonsense away since good/bad seller negotiation should happen in the PM's and experience reporting stays in the feedback forum.
Scheimpflug wrote: |
Won't this system essentially require moderator attention for every single thread in the Marketplace section?
|
If made too complicated, yes. _________________ Lars
Bodies:
DSLR: Nikon D200
SLR: Nikon FA, Pentax Spotmatic SPII, Zeiss Ikon Icarex 35TM
35mm: Voigtl�nder Vitoret
Nikkor MF
24/2.8K AI'd, 28/2.8 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 Micro, 35-70/3.5 AIS, 85/1.8K AI'd, 100/2.8 Series E, 105/2.5 AI, 105/2.5 AIS, 135/3.5 AI, Nikkor 180/2.8 ED AIS, 200/4-Q AI'd, 300/4.5-H AI'd
M42
Misc: Vivitar 28/2.5, Chinon 28/2.8, Cosina Auto Cosinon 50/1.8, Revue Auto Revuenon 50/1.8, Mamiya 50/2, Auto Flex 55/1.7, Cosina Cosinon 135/2.8 MC, Vivitar 135/2.8, Petri 200/3.5 CC Auto
Zeiss: Carl Zeiss (Ikon) Tessar 50/2.8, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, CZJ Pancolar Electric 50/1.8 MC, CZJ Biotar 58/2 T, CZJ Sonnar MC S 135/3.5
Asahi-Pentax: SMC-Takumar 55/1.8, Super-Takumar 105/2.8, SMC-Takumar 135/3.5
USSR: Mir-1 37/2.8 (1958 GP), Helios 44-2 58/2
Pentacon/Meyer: Pentacon 29/2.8 MC, Pentacon 50/1.8 MC Electric, Meyer G�rlitz Oreston 50/1.8, Meyer G�rlitz Orestor 135/2.8, Pentacon 200/4
Nikkor AF
50/1.8 D, 60/2.8 Micro, 55-200/4-5.6 G VR, 70-300/4-5.6 ED, 18-70/3.5-4.5 G
Wantlist
Nikkor 105/1.8, Nikkor 135/2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|