View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:33 am Post subject: 28mm halfsize lens for 72 exposures on 135 film |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
Interesting lens well described by vendor on eBay, for once:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Soviet-WIDE-ANGLE-M39-LENS-INDUSTAR-69-2-8-28-/360272677349?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item53e1ecc9e5
I knew there were such cameras, but had thought they were integral with lens and of the plastic type. Not too bad a price either, for the very flat size. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
I think it's a half-frame design, and you get vignetting on a full size film area like you would with an APS-C only lens. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsmlogger
Joined: 14 Apr 2010 Posts: 178 Location: Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:41 pm Post subject: Re: 28mm halfsize lens for 72 exposures on 135 film |
|
|
dsmlogger wrote:
This lens is for rangefinders, I don't know if it will work properly on a DSLR. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
Apparently it can be modified (with a fair amount of metal grinding) to allow it to focus close enough to be used on micro 4/3 cameras... DSLR usage is probably out of the question.
Looks like a cool lens though! Come to think of it, I wouldn't mind a half-frame camera either! _________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Scheimpflug wrote: |
Apparently it can be modified (with a fair amount of metal grinding) to allow it to focus close enough to be used on micro 4/3 cameras... DSLR usage is probably out of the question.
Looks like a cool lens though! Come to think of it, I wouldn't mind a half-frame camera either! |
Take a look of this thread: http://forum.mflenses.com/wide-short-tele-rf-lens-on-m4-3-t26269.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
The I-69 lens is for FED, Zorki and Leica RF's, so its mount is L39 not M39. The L39 lens register is 28.8mm; 4:3 system is 38.58, and other dSLRs are even longer. No infinity focus without surgery, and that Industar doesn't look like it has an extra 10mm of body to cut away. My old Olympus Pen-FT half-frame SLR (register= 28.95mm) could take this I-69 and probably still reach infinity if stopped down a bit. If I still had it. Half-frame L39 RF's? Is anyone here familiar with those? _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mutabot
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
mutabot wrote:
JFYI: Micro 4/3 is 20mm register distance. I'm sure there must be L39 adapters available... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
mutabot wrote: |
JFYI: Micro 4/3 is 20mm register distance. I'm sure there must be L39 adapters available... |
I had referred to Camera Mounts Sorted by Register page which says "4/3 System digital -bayonet - 38.58". The 4:3 system Wikipedia entry says, "The Four Thirds lens mount is specified to be a bayonet type with a flange focal distance of 38.67 mm." Is it really 20mm? I must admit to a total lack of 4:3 experience; I only know what I read, if that. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mutabot
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mutabot wrote:
Micro 4/3 is a bit different mount from 4/3. It is basically a mirorless version of 4/3, thus a shorter register. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|