View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16664 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:27 am Post subject: How to determine the length of a needed helicoid |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
I have been asked, if there is a way to simply determine the needed length of a helicoid to reach infinity focus.
If you have the register length ("Auflagemass" in german) for a given length, yes, otherwise measurements or an approximation has to be used.
Denote:
RLL = Register Length of a Lens
RLC = Register Length of a camera (Nikon, Canon EOS, 4/3 - you name it)
HLI = Helicoid Length at Infinity
AL = Adaptor Length (usually a few millimeters thickness only)
then:
HLI = RLL - RLC - AL
that also means that HLI cannot be negative and has to be at least some 15mm or so (shortest Helicoid I know of). This also explains why with some lenses infinity focus cannot be reached.
If RLL is not known, the following procedure allows to measure it approximately:
take a white sheet of paper, a ruler and your lens, hold the lens in front of the white paper in a darkened room and point the lens front with fully open aperture to the outside to a bright object (can be the sun also, but be careful not to burn the paper) at least 100x further away then the focal length of that lens until you get a sharp image on that paper. Now measure the distance from that paper to the flange of the lens (end of the thread or mount (could be bajonet etc.) - not just the physical end of the lens!). This is approximately RLL.
If you want to use that lens for macro shooting, say at 1:1 magnification, then point the lens using the same procedure to a bright lamp (desktop tungsten works well) until you see an projected image which has the same size as the original lamp (us the visible lamp filament for instance (stepping down helps if the image is too bright). Keep that position and repeat the measurement at mentioned above). That gives you the approximation for RLL(1x) at magnification 1x.
Now we get
HL(1x) = RLL(1x) - RLC - AL
where HL(1x) denotes the needed maximum extension of your helicoid and
HR = HL(1x) - HLI is the range your helicoid has to cover when turning from infinity to 1x magnification (you can replace 1x with any wished factor of course). If HR is too long, it has to be replaced with a shorter helicoid and a tube of fixed length (say to reach only 0.5x for instance). [Example, if you would need HR = 50mm and the longest helicoid you can find is 25mm, then add a 25mm tube to reach 50mm] _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
Last edited by kds315* on Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Thanks a lot, Klaus. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
Thanks Klaus, was just thinking about buying a focusing helicoid ... _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasan
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hasan wrote:
Thanks Klaus, great explanation.
I'd like to find a "real" or at least better helicoid for my Leitz Colorplan 2.5/90mm,
(this was my attempt to adapt it for my Pentax K100D: http://forum.mflenses.com/leitz-colorplan-12-5-90mm-t16838.html
I would be interested in this one, as shown here, but don't know where to search?!
http://www.ksmt.com/eos10d/eos_nikki_body22.htm#071212 _________________ Pentax Z20 |Pentax K100D |SMC K35/3.5 |SMC K50/1.4 |SMC A50/1.4
|SMC K135/2.5 |SMC DA18-55 |SMC FA80-320 |AR 135/2.8(Chinon) |AR 55/1.4(M42)
|Sigma MF 90/2.8 |Sigma 28-80/3.5-5.6 |Exakta 24/2.8 |Vivitar 2x Macro Focusing TC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
Hi,
I have just taken a look at the pics (sorry, cannot read japanese), it seems that there is a kind of focuser inside the extension tubes ...
Frankly, don't know if that would be easy but why don't you try to find a short tele lens (kind of 100-135mm) "for parts or repair", to remove the inner lenses and mount your Colorplan instead ?
Actually, i'm trying to do the same with a "dead" Tessar 50/2.8 and my enlargers lenses ...
Cheers _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
Very useful (if obvious once explained well) and also applies to bellows as well as helicoids. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
motleypixel
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 135 Location: Austin, TX USA
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
motleypixel wrote:
Boy this is quite interesting. Humm...just learning lens construction myself but I'll ask this for starters: When solving for "needed length of helicoid", is this the required length that helicoid must be in order for the optics to work correctly OR simply the required travel of the helicoid for the optics to work? In other words is it a length in which say a lens technician can change or is it a hard manufactured length. Also, how do I calculate RLC or where could I find the value for my Canon 5D Mk II?
I recently tore a Rokkor-PF 58mm f/1.4 down completely...wasn't that bad...removed the rear element mount/aperture ring/focus distance ring and element tube and was able to access the rear side of the aperture for cleaning and then removed all the front elements for cleaning and to clean the front side of the aperture.
Now what I believe to be the helicoid is the AL threaded ring that screws into the inside of the outer main focus ring...I mucked with the factory position of this ring and thus it seems it's now limiting further motion to the rear aka infinity. I also know that there's a main front baffel around the front of the lens with 3 screws that lock the helicoid and I believe this (thanks to web resources) to be the infinity focus adjustment. I need to figure out how far out that AL helicoid piece should be before putting on the distance scale ring and putting the lens back so that I can be close to the full MFD and Infinity Focus of the lens as possible. _________________ -Roy
T h e M o t l e y P i x e l |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
I think this is one of those cases where something disassembled can be re-assembled several ways, and the good advice to you before you started would have been to scratch witness marks so that you could see exactly how they went back together.
I realize that advice is a bit late now. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
Small problem: Calculating the dimensions of a needed helicoid.
Larger problem: FINDING a helicoid of the desired dimensions!
My problem: I use my Schneider Betavaron 50-125/4-5.6 fixed-focus enlarger zoom for both general and macro photography. I can mount it on my M42 bellows which are a minimum of 35mm thick, and easily shoot macros, but cannot reach infinity focus. Or I can mount it on about 30mm of extension tubes to reach infinity, but focusing closer requires an odd dance of moving about and zooming. So I need a helicoid that extends from ~30-32mm out to 60mm or beyond, in order to shoot both macro and non-macro without changing from bellows to tubes.
I have seen M42 helicoids in the US$100 range with throws of ~16-32mm or ~35-70mm. Neither of those would work for me. The short helicoid is too short to be useful; the long helicoid is too long for infinity focus. The obvious solution is to buy TWO short helicoids... but ~US$200 is more than I want to spend on this. I thought to destroy an unwanted M42 lens but 1) I have none I wish to sacrifice and 2) the throw would be too short to be useful.
Can anyone here point to sources of arbitrary helicoids? _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11067 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
RioRico wrote: |
Small problem: Calculating the dimensions of a needed helicoid.
Larger problem: FINDING a helicoid of the desired dimensions!
My problem: I use my Schneider Betavaron 50-125/4-5.6 fixed-focus enlarger zoom for both general and macro photography. I can mount it on my M42 bellows which are a minimum of 35mm thick, and easily shoot macros, but cannot reach infinity focus. Or I can mount it on about 30mm of extension tubes to reach infinity, but focusing closer requires an odd dance of moving about and zooming. So I need a helicoid that extends from ~30-32mm out to 60mm or beyond, in order to shoot both macro and non-macro without changing from bellows to tubes.
I have seen M42 helicoids in the US$100 range with throws of ~16-32mm or ~35-70mm. Neither of those would work for me. The short helicoid is too short to be useful; the long helicoid is too long for infinity focus. The obvious solution is to buy TWO short helicoids... but ~US$200 is more than I want to spend on this. I thought to destroy an unwanted M42 lens but 1) I have none I wish to sacrifice and 2) the throw would be too short to be useful.
Can anyone here point to sources of arbitrary helicoids? |
Add extension tube(s) to short helicoid? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Add extension tube(s) to short helicoid? |
That would get the minimum distance to the right spot, but it would only have about half of the travel that RioRico needs... _________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11067 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Scheimpflug wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
Add extension tube(s) to short helicoid? |
That would get the minimum distance to the right spot, but it would only have about half of the travel that RioRico needs... |
For some reason this reminds me of the question: "What macro lenses go from infinity to 1:1 without adding extension?" _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
Scheimpflug wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
Add extension tube(s) to short helicoid? |
That would get the minimum distance to the right spot, but it would only have about half of the travel that RioRico needs... |
Quite right, and I'd already considered that. A big gap exists in the available M42 helicoids. Life just isn't fair...
visualopsins wrote: |
For some reason this reminds me of the question: "What macro lenses go from infinity to 1:1 without adding extension?" |
Two answers are the two cheap M42 macros I have, the Macro-Takumar 50/4 (1:1 version, US$50) and the Vivitar-Komine 90/2.8 (US$3). Both are superb lenses, but neither is as WEIRD nor as brutally sharp as the Betavaron, which is sui generis, in a class by itself. With the right helicoid, it would probably become my 4th or 5th most-used lens (out of 155), and about the only real macro-zoom around. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11067 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
RioRico wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
For some reason this reminds me of the question: "What macro lenses go from infinity to 1:1 without adding extension?" |
Two answers are the two cheap M42 macros I have, the Macro-Takumar 50/4 (1:1 version, US$50) and the Vivitar-Komine 90/2.8 (US$3). Both are superb lenses, but neither is as WEIRD nor as brutally sharp as the Betavaron, which is sui generis, in a class by itself. With the right helicoid, it would probably become my 4th or 5th most-used lens (out of 155), and about the only real macro-zoom around. |
Well wishes for success in finding that helicoid. Meanwhile, get the short helicoid & use it like a 1:2, attaching a tube when necessary. I know, I know, I too have been spoiled with the convenience of the 1:1 Macro-Takumar.
Another option would be a threaded movement rather than helicoid, such as nested brass tubes threaded together with well-chosen pitch. The lens turns when focusing, is that a problem? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
Meanwhile, get the short helicoid & use it like a 1:2, attaching a tube when necessary. |
Yes, that would just barely work since I have a seemingly-rare 16mm M42 tube (most short tubes seem to be 12mm). But to my no-longer-employed self, US$100 feels like an awful lot of money for a simple piece of hardware that is still an inadequate solution.
Quote: |
Another option would be a threaded movement rather than helicoid, such as nested brass tubes threaded together with well-chosen pitch. The lens turns when focusing, is that a problem? |
Hmm, an interesting idea. A turning lens is no problem, because the lens' arbitrary zoom and aperture scales are printed on two sides of the body, and any turning will just make using the lens even weirder. The tricky part is the "well-chosen pitch". Like, 5 or 10 or 15 rotations to achieve 30mm throw would be a bit tedious. That is no problem on a tripod but not pleasant for my mostly handheld shooting. I will check with suppliers and see how rough a pitch is available.
Push-pull focusing tubes might work, if a bit sloppy. But I suppose I must murder a lens eventually, something with the right throw. Sigh. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManuallyYours
Joined: 21 Jun 2012 Posts: 35 Location: Lyon, FRANCE
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManuallyYours wrote:
Thanks for these tips. I wonder so many times how to calculate. _________________ NIKON d300s+MB-D10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marzipan
Joined: 21 Jan 2013 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
marzipan wrote:
I think the best quick solution is to find two tubes (plastic, cardboard or metal) that slip into each other exactly. The mount is fixed on the end of one tube, the lens block in the other. One can make angled slots in the outer tube, and use screws that fit in the slots to limit the focusing range when you turn the front tube (and so that nothing falls out).
The zooming is actually done in a similar way in normal cheap kit lenses, all plastic and slots and screws. A thought: Put the optical block into a gutted DSLR kit lens? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
16:9
Joined: 04 Apr 2014 Posts: 311 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2022 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
16:9 wrote:
All tested enlarger, projector and industrial lenses in Delta have the F-FD listed, along with what we've called 'Extension' - the required depth of helicoid (including the adaptor). All Extension figures are quoted at infinity focus.
Because projector lenses never have fixed registration, we sometimes list Extension specified from the rear of the barrel; sometimes from the rear element. Many shorter projector lenses need tube surgery before they can be used.
For an explanation similar to Klaus' above, with a diagram, please see here:
https://deltalenses.com/index.php/2022/02/24/how-to-use-delta/
Note that the correct helicoid for your target lens depends on which camera you're using. _________________ If it ain't broke, break it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
16:9
Joined: 04 Apr 2014 Posts: 311 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2022 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
16:9 wrote:
If you have Extension or FFD information about a lens Delta doesn't know, please PM me so we can share it with the community. _________________ If it ain't broke, break it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|