View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KarelDH
Joined: 24 Mar 2011 Posts: 169 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:01 pm Post subject: Projector lens i presume |
|
|
KarelDH wrote:
hi
here are two lenses i desperately wanted to try
today if found a way to use one of them, the big projector lens ( i guess)
there is nothing written on it, an its not very good.
test shot (with the big lens)
now for the other one, it seems to need a great distance of at least 40 cm
between the end of the lens and the sensor.
if i would make tube, what kind of diameter will it need ?
and any familiar whit this lens ?
rectilineare extra rapide j.d.l.f (or j.d.e.f) 28 cm
ty
Last edited by KarelDH on Wed May 11, 2011 6:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
last one looks a large format wooden box lens. Due extra large negative 18x24cm glass don't need to be a super sharp lens _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Attila wrote: |
last one looks a large format wooden box lens. Due extra large negative 18x24cm glass don't need to be a super sharp lens |
+1
Rapid Rectilinear lenses were corrected for rectilinear distortions so lines appear straight, not curved but not corrected for much else so CA, coma etc will be noticeable, this is long before colour emulsions so colour handling may be strange,
The bigger lens is from a magic lantern type projector, intended for projecting large glass slides, could be from anytime between 1860 and 1910. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Rapid Rectilinear lenses can be quite sharp, if stopped down. I suppose it depends mostly on the quality. Maximum aperture is normally f/8.
What you have is definitely a camera lens, it has an aperture mechanism.
A 28cm lens will be of course require 28cm between the camera sensor and the end of the lens at infinity. Because this is a long lens and not a telephoto it will also require a focusing mechanism that has enough travel to be useful, at least 100mm and maybe 150mm. I suggest if you want to mount it on a DSLR the best option will be to use a bellows, with a tube attached to the end to add length. The diameter of the tube is not really that important, probably it doesn't need to be bigger than 40mm on the inside. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Rapid Rectilinear lenses can be quite sharp, if stopped down. I suppose it depends mostly on the quality. Maximum aperture is normally f/8.
What you have is definitely a camera lens, it has an aperture mechanism.
A 28cm lens will be of course require 28cm between the camera sensor and the end of the lens at infinity. Because this is a long lens and not a telephoto it will also require a focusing mechanism that has enough travel to be useful, at least 100mm and maybe 150mm. I suggest if you want to mount it on a DSLR the best option will be to use a bellows, with a tube attached to the end to add length. The diameter of the tube is not really that important, probably it doesn't need to be bigger than 40mm on the inside. |
+1
The original plate camera it came from will have had a lot of travel in it's focussing bellows. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:42 pm Post subject: Re: Projector lens i presume |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
KarelDH wrote: |
today if found a way to use one of them, the big projector lens ( i guess)
there is nothing written on it, an its not very good.
test shot (with the big lens)
|
Don't be afraid to post-process. Some of these old lenses are actually a lot better than people realize at first.........
_________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KarelDH
Joined: 24 Mar 2011 Posts: 169 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KarelDH wrote:
hi,
wow it looks pretty good actually !
thanks
( yust to confirm this is a test shot whit the big lens, magic lantern type projector lens). so i was not expecting allot, the tiny one i still need to test, looks pretty sharp on the wall). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
What you have is definitely a camera lens, it has an aperture mechanism. |
In general, enlarger lenses also have aperture mechanisms, as do some very few projector lenses, such as my Industar-58 75/3.5. I'm just picking nits here.
True, most projector lenses have no iris. Sharpness can be improved somewhat by improvising Waterhouse stops to fit behind the rear element. One trick: If an M42 adapter can be fitted to the lens, I'll screw a 25-42mm step ring (big flat disc) into the mount. Maybe I'll look for similar adapters with smaller internal openings.
But I like to use projector lenses wide-open, even if only for the softness and glow of OOF areas. If find old Kodak Ektagraphic or Ektanar 100-150mm f/3.5 projector zooms to be quite interesting (and real cheap). I cut away the rear (plastic) lens body as needed, and glue on a section of cheap modular macro tube to use as an adapter.
Which leads to a general approach: macro tubes as lens adapters.
Narrow-body lenses can sometimes be fitted into M42 tubes. On my Pentax SLRs, I use cheap modular PK tubes (under US$8 per set, shipped) which have sections about 10-15-25mm thick, with male and female mount adapter sections. These tubes have an inner diameter about 56mm, with 60mm threads. (Tubes for other mounts like Nikon and Minolta have different thread sizes and diameters.) So if a projector or xray or other lens has some body section that is 56mm across, a tube section can be glued or taped on, and the mount adapter can be applied. Sometimes I also wrap rubber bands around the lens body, to easily stabilize it within the tube. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Yes, enlarger lenses also had aperture mechanisms.
However, there were few dedicated enlarger lenses until the 1930's, and not in any numbers until the 1940's. Until then popular photography depended on contact prints. Enlargers would mostly have used ordinary large format lenses appropriate for the paper size.
This lens is much older than the days of enlarger lenses - 1900-1910 at the latest I would say. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Also, there's a 99% chance that the Projector lens is a Petzval type. Very nice for portraits and other similar subjects. Try it out and don't be afraid to do some PP! _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7796 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
An d just this afternoon, while very bored, I used an old T2 mount that was missing the inner part, a 1 3/4" length of plastic tube chopped off an empty
mastic gun tube, lots of insulating tape, and an Isco Gottingen Projar 85 2.8 lens that I had to chop 1/8" off the back to get infinity focus.
Sliding the lens in and out of the plastic tube that is held in the bit of T2 adaptor with even more tape makes it a focusing lens. Once I've got used to the finer points of it's precision operation.
But these were the better of the test shots.
Of the two looking up the church steps, one was focused on infinity ( kinda ) and one on the lower step.
The last one of the church clock surprises me, it's not great. But it's way better than I ever thought it would be. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|