View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
Does the CA and corner blurring looks really bad for the 16/2.8 compared with other 24mm eq? Or is it normal at this focal length?
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX5/NEX5A4.HTM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
Review here:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX5/NEX5A.HTM
Apologies if it has already been posted!
The lack of buttons externally is disappointing but the noise handling looks great, the one area where my Panny G1 lets itself down imho _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
fatdeeman wrote: |
Apologies if it has already been posted!
|
Normally I wouldn't mention it, but… the link was in the post directly above yours. =) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
Ya, the noise performance seems very good compare with m4/3. I guess many of us here are interested in knowing how friendly the UI is towards manual focus though. It seems to gear more towards the auto shooting... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anu
Joined: 14 Apr 2009 Posts: 879
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anu wrote:
At least the jpegs look rather nice, but we know nothing about the potential corrections made in the camera. Still, considering 18mm flange focal distance, and APS-C-sized sensor, it seems rather nice indeed, though only the raws will tell the whole story. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anu
Joined: 14 Apr 2009 Posts: 879
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anu wrote:
fatdeeman wrote: |
Review here:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/NEX5/NEX5A.HTM
Apologies if it has already been posted!
The lack of buttons externally is disappointing but the noise handling looks great, the one area where my Panny G1 lets itself down imho |
Regarding the buttons, it must be remembered who is the target group for these two models of the new camera lineup - it is the ones who buy the most cameras, not the folks who like to use manual settings. I am sure there'll be a camera with more buttons later on this year. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anu
Joined: 14 Apr 2009 Posts: 879
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anu wrote:
aleksanderpolo wrote: |
Ya, the noise performance seems very good compare with m4/3. I guess many of us here are interested in knowing how friendly the UI is towards manual focus though. It seems to gear more towards the auto shooting... |
Lately the Sony sensors have been very good indeed, and since this is a totallly new one, a solid signal/noise performance is to be expected, especially since APS-C is quite a bit larger than m4/3.
The "real" S/N will of course be only revealed once the raw files are out there and can be processed with 3rd party software. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
Arkku wrote: |
fatdeeman wrote: |
Apologies if it has already been posted!
|
Normally I wouldn't mention it, but… the link was in the post directly above yours. =) |
That's what I get for leaving the reply box open and coming back and pressing submit hours later! _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Some more interesting development. An interview with xclusive interview with Toru Katsumoto, Senior General Manager, Imaging Division 3. http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Interview-with-Sonys-Toru-Katsumoto-13659
Autofocus should be working with the adapter for Sony lenses. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
my_photography wrote: |
Autofocus should be working with the adapter for Sony lenses. :D |
Read carefully; that's their wishful thinking. They say it's not working now, but will be addressed with a firmware update “when it's done”. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Here is the quote:
At the launch it was mentioned that the adapter for the A mount lenses has compatibility issues such as AF not working. Is that something that's going to be amended in the future?
Mr Katsumoto: Autofocus should be working with the adapter and we have engineers still working very hard. We wanted to prepare a solution for connecting the A mount lenses from the beginning so that's why we released it. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
my_photography wrote: |
Here is the quote:
At the launch it was mentioned that the adapter for the A mount lenses has compatibility issues such as AF not working. Is that something that's going to be amended in the future?
Mr Katsumoto: Autofocus should be working with the adapter and we have engineers still working very hard. We wanted to prepare a solution for connecting the A mount lenses from the beginning so that's why we released it. |
Yes, but it seems to mean that it should work (i.e. eventually) but doesn't, and that's why engineers are still working very hard but they released it without AF because they wanted to have a solution for connection A mount lenses from the beginning.
Also note the follow-up question:
Quote: |
So in time Sony will have a solution for the focusing problem?
Mr Kondo: When it's done maybe we can do it on a firmware upgrade.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Arkku wrote: |
my_photography wrote: |
Here is the quote:
At the launch it was mentioned that the adapter for the A mount lenses has compatibility issues such as AF not working. Is that something that's going to be amended in the future?
Mr Katsumoto: Autofocus should be working with the adapter and we have engineers still working very hard. We wanted to prepare a solution for connecting the A mount lenses from the beginning so that's why we released it. |
Yes, but it seems to mean that it should work (i.e. eventually) but doesn't, and that's why engineers are still working very hard but they released it without AF because they wanted to have a solution for connection A mount lenses from the beginning.
Also note the follow-up question:
Quote: |
So in time Sony will have a solution for the focusing problem?
Mr Kondo: When it's done maybe we can do it on a firmware upgrade.
|
|
Yes, not working yet but eventually should work. Any way, I am happy with the direction Sony is going at this. At least the current Minolta/Sony DSLR users are not left behind. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
my_photography wrote: |
Yes, not working yet but eventually should work. Any way, I am happy with the direction Sony is going at this. At least the current Minolta/Sony DSLR users are not left behind. |
I'm 99% sure that even if the adapter will support AF, it will only be with SSM/SAM/HSM lenses.
But, hey, this is the manual focus lenses forum, I wouldn't have thought anyone cares. =) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
Arkku wrote: |
But, hey, this is the manual focus lenses forum, I wouldn't have thought anyone cares. =) |
It all started with that "AF Gallery" section... the evil is spreading! _________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
For us it is not the point if AF works for the (D)SLR-lenses, but if the concept and lancing give a reliable impression on getting enough buyers and keeping the concept on the market for a long period. Not enough clients = no future. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2108 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Adapters are already in a make > http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20100521_368656.html
In short, they are planning for "nikon G-lens" and "Pentax DA lens" with
aperture ring, and for "canon FD lens", "Pentax K lens", "Y/C lens", and
"Leica M lens" without aperture ring (of course). The former costs Y25,200
and the later (witout aperture ring) costs Y19,900, in July.
Maker is "RAYQUAL" so that you may be able to get them through "japan exposure" I guess. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
if an APS-C mirrorrless format catches on, it has the potential to force the dSLR market to position upwards - i.e. full frame. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Nesster wrote: |
if an APS-C mirrorrless format catches on, it has the potential to force the dSLR market to position upwards - i.e. full frame. |
or full frame mirrorless _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
poilu wrote: |
Nesster wrote: |
if an APS-C mirrorrless format catches on, it has the potential to force the dSLR market to position upwards - i.e. full frame. |
or full frame mirrorless |
Or, full frame mirrorrless range finder - back to the 50's with Leica, Nikon, Canon RF _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
koji wrote: |
Adapters are already in a make > http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20100521_368656.html
In short, they are planning for "nikon G-lens" and "Pentax DA lens" with
aperture ring, and for "canon FD lens", "Pentax K lens", "Y/C lens", and
"Leica M lens" without aperture ring (of course). The former costs Y25,200
and the later (witout aperture ring) costs Y19,900, in July.
Maker is "RAYQUAL" so that you may be able to get them through "japan exposure" I guess. |
Many thanks for this great news! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
onlinephotographer has an hands on review. Looks like the setting buried under menu thing is going to be very annoying... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|