| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
paperinik
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 100
Location: Adro, italy
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:47 am Post subject: Pancolar 1.8 50 "aus Jena" BAD rear element |
 |
|
paperinik wrote:
Hello everybody!!!!!
Since there is some discussion about the Pancolar performance, I'd like to give my small contribution.
This is made with an "aus Jena" zebra version, with a bad, bad, BAD rear element. Standard version, no "1Q", no nothing.
The camera is a -brrr- EOS 350D, that a collegue borrowed to me. Slightly cropped.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 1888
Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
Looks fine to me!
Do you have a picture of the bad rear element?
_________________
Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers  ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paperinik
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 100
Location: Adro, italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paperinik wrote:
Not yet, but I'd prefer to avoid, since it was my fault...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
verdurina
Joined: 16 May 2010
Posts: 58
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
verdurina wrote:
I not understand...what is "aus Jena"?
_________________
if you like photography, maybe you should visit my site!
MY FLICKR
Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi
M42 lenses: Pentacon 200mm f4 / Helios 44-2 / Helios 44m-4 MC / Helios 44m-7 / Zeiss Aus Jena DDR Tessar / Marep 135mm f3.5/ MC Zenitar 50mm f1.9 / Jupiter 37AM 135mm f3.5/ Mir-1b 37mm f2.8 / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| verdurina wrote: |
| I not understand...what is "aus Jena"? |
The "aus Jena" ones were made in the GDR for export to the Western European countries and overseas. The Carl Zeiss Jena ones were made for the Eastern European countries. This was due to the fact the Carl Zeiss was split after WWII in the company in Oberkochen (renowned for the Contax and Hasselblad lenses) and the Company in Jena (M42 and Pentacon six lenses). Since Praktica cameras were saled in Western Germany and western Europe they had to rename the lenses.
Basically the "aus Jena" ones and the ones with Carl Zeiss Jena are the same. Quality control might have been better for the export versions.
(IANUS)
http://forum.mflenses.com/aus-jena-or-made-in-jena-t11407,highlight,aus+jena.html
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paperinik
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 100
Location: Adro, italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paperinik wrote:
wooops!
I've just noticed from the exif that the camera is a 400D, not a 350.
Sorry but the camera is not mine, My colleague borrowed me for a photo sevice, and frankly I don't care so much abot the camera I handle.
I just needed a digital body, this was digital. Ok. done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
verdurina
Joined: 16 May 2010
Posts: 58
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
verdurina wrote:
| Attila wrote: |
| verdurina wrote: |
| I not understand...what is "aus Jena"? |
The "aus Jena" ones were made in the GDR for export to the Western European countries and overseas. The Carl Zeiss Jena ones were made for the Eastern European countries. This was due to the fact the Carl Zeiss was split after WWII in the company in Oberkochen (renowned for the Contax and Hasselblad lenses) and the Company in Jena (M42 and Pentacon six lenses). Since Praktica cameras were saled in Western Germany and western Europe they had to rename the lenses.
Basically the "aus Jena" ones and the ones with Carl Zeiss Jena are the same. Quality control might have been better for the export versions.
(IANUS)
http://forum.mflenses.com/aus-jena-or-made-in-jena-t11407,highlight,aus+jena.html |
thanks, now everything is clear!
_________________
if you like photography, maybe you should visit my site!
MY FLICKR
Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi
M42 lenses: Pentacon 200mm f4 / Helios 44-2 / Helios 44m-4 MC / Helios 44m-7 / Zeiss Aus Jena DDR Tessar / Marep 135mm f3.5/ MC Zenitar 50mm f1.9 / Jupiter 37AM 135mm f3.5/ Mir-1b 37mm f2.8 / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
