Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
At the risk of being shunned and banned, may I suggest that unwanted cheap common-as-dirt lenses may be sacrificed for science? Deliberately scratch/smash the front and/or rear elements to determine how much damage they can withstand and still deliver acceptable images. Or is this too much like Dr Mengele?
I don't have any extra Takumar 50/1.2's to use as test subjects. Bother. Maybe a Domiplan? Nobody will mourn for a Domi, will they?
OK everybody, calm down, relax. Put away the ropes, the tar and feathers, the shotguns. Attila, you can withdraw your attack parrot. I won't hurt such glass. My test subjects are more likely to be an extra Kodak 100-150/3.5 projector lens, or something I pull from a junked Polaroid Swinger. Polaroid Swingers are like chickens -- they DESERVE to be eaten!
Has anyone here conducted such tests? Will you confess? _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |