| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
djronbxs
Joined: 26 Jan 2011
Posts: 15
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:25 pm Post subject: Best 3d effect manual lenses |
 |
|
djronbxs wrote:
Hi,
can you please suggest some good 3d effect manual lenses like the Meyer Orestor 135mm ?
thanks
ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eddieitman
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 1246
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eddieitman wrote:
This has already been covered quite extensivly in this topic
http://forum.mflenses.com/best-3d-effect-lenses-suggestion-t39412.html
maybve worth reading through it
_________________
My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
Out of more than 50 lenses I have, the most 3D by far is Zeiss Sonnar 85/2.8 (C/Y mount). Then, the 50/1.4 and 50/1.7 Planars. Nikkor 50/1.4 AI/AIS. Then Zeiss Distagon 28/2.8. And that's about it for me.
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 1888
Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
There is always the Vivitar Series 1 Q-DOS. (Red/cyan anaglyph)
Otherwise, there are the add-on beam-splitter type attachments (Loreo, etc).
_________________
Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers  ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Any lens which is decently sharp with a nice smooth boken will give 3D images. It's not some magical quality of a particular lens, it's more a function of the relationship between the distances to the subject and to the background. The optimum distances are greater for longer focal lengths.
Do a little trial - use a 135 lens, set the aperture around 2.8 or 4, choose a subject say about 50m away and the background about 100m. Now keep taking shots as you walk slowly towards the subject, refocussing of course.
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djronbxs
Joined: 26 Jan 2011
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
djronbxs wrote:
Hi,
I would like to clarify myself abit. The lenses I am after are the ones that produce the best pop effect. One example is the Meyer Orestor 135mm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Take a look at the images I just posted in the Oversized gallery...sorry there's so many there, but you may see some pop 
http://forum.mflenses.com/san-francisco-impressions-colour-lots-of-photos-t43196.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/sf-police-officers-and-firefighters-observance-of-9-11-t43197.html
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 733
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
Refer to the thread linked to in the first reply. No need to replicate that discussion again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
