Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:59 pm Post subject: Tamron 24mm f2.8 vs Sigma 400mm f5.6 APO |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I got bought dirt cheap, Tamron was not described and it had crappy picture. Sigma has fungus and Canon FD mount both went on silly price 21 GBP and 20 USD
Even if weather was crappy I couldn't resist to make at least one capture with them image quality is crappy good only for presentation how long a 400mm lens on Panasonic G1 body. Both shoot made from same position handheld ISO 640 noisy removed , contrast improved etc, but not sharpened.
![](http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20109/5_sigma_400mm_f5_6_apo09_1.jpg) _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|