Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

HorusBennu/Phoenix 50mm f/1.7
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:48 pm    Post subject: HorusBennu/Phoenix 50mm f/1.7 Reply with quote

Any one has experience or opinion on the HorusBennu/Phoenix 50mm f/1.7? Some says it's a Korean lens, others say it's a Chinese lens.



http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/88237-new-ebay-50mm-f1-7-lens.html

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/NEW-HorusBennu-50mm-F1-7-Lens-Pentax-PK-UV-Filter-/270531811276?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item3efcf3d7cc

http://www.photomalaysia.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112202

How does it compare to the other 50mm Yashica ML, Planar, Rokkor, Nikkor, Canon, OM, etc. I don't have any Pentax lens, so when people compared it to the FA50, I have no idea what it meant.

Thanx


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phoenix vs Planar. Can't wait for the result of this comparison. Smile Wink


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kansalliskala wrote:
Phoenix vs Planar. Can't wait for the result of this comparison. Smile Wink


Any comparison must be qualified with the cost. Otherwise, everyone would drive a Ferrari.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got a Ricoh Rikenon 50/1.7 in m42 mount recently. The price was 11 euros inclusive shipping. It performed very well, I'd say just brilliant for that price.

This one is quite expensive, for a 3rd party lens and the word limeted makes me thing they try (at least ebay seller) to bullshit possible buyers, like it's something rare. Well maybe outside of Korea it is.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've heard Chinese. This lens was often rebadged to make fake Yashica ML 50/1.7 (source: http://www.hi-ho.ne.jp/sbko-hq/FAKE/Fake_ML50mmf1.7.html ). I had one of these fake "Yashicas". It's a decent 50mm lens but nothing special. Bokeh is smoother than with the original Yashica ML 50/1.7, sharpness about the same. It has half-stops and focuses slightly closer than the Yashica. Worth about $20-25.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aoleg wrote:
I've heard Chinese. This lens was often rebadged to make fake Yashica ML 50/1.7 (source: http://www.hi-ho.ne.jp/sbko-hq/FAKE/Fake_ML50mmf1.7.html ). I had one of these fake "Yashicas". It's a decent 50mm lens but nothing special. Bokeh is smoother than with the original Yashica ML 50/1.7, sharpness about the same. It has half-stops and focuses slightly closer than the Yashica. Worth about $20-25.


Very interesting! is it better or worse than the Yashica?


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gotta love the "limited star" designation. Laughing


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kansalliskala wrote:
Phoenix vs Planar. Can't wait for the result of this comparison. Smile Wink


Laughing Laughing


PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seriously these days so many cheap and excellent 50mm lenses are available East Germans , Russians , Chinon, Nikon , Olympus OM etc ..

So really no matter how good or bad a third party lens like Phoenix etc.


PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bogolisk wrote:
Very interesting! is it better or worse than the Yashica?


Quite similar, or so it seemed. The Yashica was *maybe* a bit more contrasty/better colors, but not by much. The Phoenix had better/smoother bokeh. The Yashica is built way better. The Phoenix is smaller and lighter.


PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bogolisk wrote:
kansalliskala wrote:
Phoenix vs Planar. Can't wait for the result of this comparison. Smile Wink


Any comparison must be qualified with the cost. Otherwise, everyone would drive a Ferrari.


Or rather, everyone would be out walking while their broken down Ferraris sit in their garages. Wink Used Ferraris are surprisingly affordable (some for less than the cost of a new base model Camry or the like)... it's the maintenance costs that kill you. Wink