| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 837
Location: Netherlands
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:53 am Post subject: |
 |
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
I really don't know if this applies  ... but it is like you can look through the picture here.
Super Takumar 35/3.5 on a Canon 20D, B/W in post processing.
Btw, I only have one good functioning eye, which makes that my idea of 3D is probably very different anyway |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WallyJr74
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 146
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
WallyJr74 wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
|
Awesome! I agree that the lens aperture and distance are the key.
Took this this morning with Pancolar 50/1.8. 
_________________
-----------------------------------------------------------
Nikon D700 & some AF/MF lenses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I like this one:
Leica Elmarit-R 4/180
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mist
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 134
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mist wrote:
I like the dog by Lahnet. It pops out from my monitor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
photomorgana
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 6:36 am Post subject: Nice topic... |
|
|
photomorgana wrote:
I like this thread, some nice picture is here.
Is this a 3D...
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 4045
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:23 am Post subject: Re: Nice topic... |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
| photomorgana wrote: |
I like this thread, some nice picture is here.
Is this a 3D...
|
Welcome to this forum! I'll quote your picture because this is an anti-spam measure on this forum (a new user's first post can never contain pictures).
_________________
Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
integrale
Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 136
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
integrale wrote:
Is this 3D (Elmarit-R 90mm f/2.8 fully open on D700)?
_________________
Jakob |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
A few contenders?
# 1
# 2
# 3
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Interesting thread but confusing as there are different views on 3D, and it would seem to boil down to:- who do you want people to say "wow" to your 3D shots......99.5% of the public or 0.5% of the experts.
No one has mentioned colours, as it's difficult to get different wavelengths to foucus at the same spot....could this help to give a 3D effect as in this shot:-
http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn172/chakrata/img015-3.jpg
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
| Excalibur wrote: |
| Interesting thread but confusing as there are different views on 3D |
Yes.
In fact many of the last pictures posted are very good pictures, but they don't look 3D to me - not in the way I mean it.
One that does look 3D to me is Integrale's.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
integrale
Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 136
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
integrale wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
| Excalibur wrote: |
| Interesting thread but confusing as there are different views on 3D |
Yes.
In fact many of the last pictures posted are very good pictures, but they don't look 3D to me - not in the way I mean it.
One that does look 3D to me is Integrale's. |
Thank you - but it is interesting how 3D is concieved differently; Orio, having read many of your posts on this forum, I have a high degree of respect for your opinion - how do you define 3D? (Feel free to use my above picture to illustrate your points if that helps.)
_________________
Jakob |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
| Excalibur wrote: |
| Interesting thread but confusing as there are different views on 3D |
Yes.
In fact many of the last pictures posted are very good pictures, but they don't look 3D to me - not in the way I mean it.
One that does look 3D to me is Integrale's. |
And I know your view i.e. 3d in depth, but my simple view is:- the subject wanting to leap out of the print or computer screen esp when one of the basic un-official rules in photography is.... "to isolate your subject from things not important (to the subject).
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10472
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
| Jakob wrote: |
| how do you define 3D? |
just look a slide on a lightbox and you will understand what is 3D |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lahnet
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 1164
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lahnet wrote:
An old one.
_________________
Henrik
Lahnet-Foto
My FLICKR
Gear list |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
For me, the 3-D look is most pronounced when both the foreground and background are out of focus. So I used this criteria to choose s couple of shots. They were both taken on a Canon F-1 shooting Kodachrome 64. The first image was probably taken with a Vivitar S1 28-90 f/2.8-3.5, and the second was taken with a Sigma 600mm f/8 mirror.
I call this one "The Nose" because that was the point of focus.
A couple of air show officials. Hawker Sea Fury in the background. No foreground visible in this image, but to me it still has a strong 3-D effect.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/
Last edited by cooltouch on Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:31 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
photomorgana
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:21 am Post subject: Re: Nice topic... |
|
|
photomorgana wrote:
| Spotmatic wrote: |
| Welcome to this forum! I'll quote your picture because this is an anti-spam measure on this forum (a new user's first post can never contain pictures). |
Thanks Spotmatic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 2108
Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
An interesting thread. I searched for some 3D-ness photos, which do not
use "telescopic effect" and are mostly in focus. I am not sure these samples
convey Orio's truly 3D-ness suhc as his first photo in this thread in totally
different cases.
Hydrangea (Makro-Planar 50/2 ZF)
Building (Contax G-Planar 45/2, famous for its 3D-ness)
Geranium (KERN Switar 50/1,8 not macro lens, old Fuji Reala shot)
I shot the same geranium with KERN macro Switar 50/1.9, but it did not have the same 3D-ness.
By the way these 3D-ness is totally lens dependent I guess.
I cannot see well now, the both eyes are not focused correctly (i.e. no 3D depth) due to the recent
"fall" which damaged my brain a bit, may require six months to recover.
_________________
Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Koji, the first two definitely have a lot of dimensionality !!
Best wishes for your recovery! It is very sad what has happened but fortunately you will be able to recover, this is great news
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 2108
Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Now using "perspective" these shots show 3Dness, but they are mostly in focus (i.e. no telescopic shots).
In vienna (central market) Zeiss 25/2.8 ZM @f5.6??
Taro (Nikkor AF 16/2,8 fisheye @f9)
House and garden (Zeiss 21/2.8 ZF @f8 )
Bridge and river in Uji (Cosina Voigtlander Ultron 28/1.9 @f8 )
_________________
Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses
Last edited by koji on Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
advertisement by Zeiss:-
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/51/260451.jpg
I'm trying to find a shot of sculpture in b/w that I saw on a forum, it was terrific 3d.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
photomorgana
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
photomorgana wrote:
maybe those?
[img]http://images18.fotki.com/v673/fileTyPD/20b55/6/60982/5601444/P1140776.jpg[img] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
All these with Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1.4/50 and Eos 5D2 ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1.4/50 @4
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1.4/50 @8
airy?
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16664
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
My contribution is a bit "different" (cross eye viewing)
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 4809
Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Simply EXCELLENT Klaus! I haven't heard from you in a long time!
My eyes ache now. 
_________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
