View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Zeeke
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 174 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zeeke wrote:
This is my Helios 44M-7 with a different design than the 44M-7 I have owned previously.
It is from 1996 and is slightly lighter and with a matt finish.
_________________ Pentax Ks1
Fuji XT10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a20010494
Joined: 15 Feb 2010 Posts: 396 Location: Perú.
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
a20010494 wrote:
no-X wrote: |
Concave element on Helios? I've never heard about anything like that |
Hahah, i mean, in the logo . _________________ www.estudiocaleidoscopio.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
symphonic
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 550 Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
Is this a Valdai manufactured 44M-4? If so, does it mean it's probably better than KMZ or any other?
I know this question has been asked a lot of times, but what's the general consensus on the best manufacturer or the best versions of Helios-44? I know that the later models (6,7) have MC, but optically they all have the Biotar design, so the main differences would be in build quality (depends on manufacturer) and coating, right?
edit: and also, what does resolution mean in Jiri's posts (like 41/20)? Is it better for the numbers to be higher? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dimitrygo
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
dimitrygo wrote:
symphonic wrote: |
Is this a Valdai manufactured 44M-4? If so, does it mean it's probably better than KMZ or any other?
I know this question has been asked a lot of times, but what's the general consensus on the best manufacturer or the best versions of Helios-44? I know that the later models (6,7) have MC, but optically they all have the Biotar design, so the main differences would be in build quality (depends on manufacturer) and coating, right?
edit: and also, what does resolution mean in Jiri's posts (like 41/20)? Is it better for the numbers to be higher? |
Yes, this is Valdai version. Please note the later models (5,6,7) were made only by Valdai so they cannot be compared to anything. The general consensus for the models made by different factories is that the KMZ is the best maker due to a QA.
Regarding the best model it is very hard to tell and depends on what you are looking in the lens and your preferences. The early models are softer, has preset aperture with many blades that make perfect round diaphragm at all settings. The 44M model has very convenient auto/manual switch and 8 aperture blades. The later models can be used only in auto mode, have only 6 aperture blades, but MC versions are less prone to a flare and have better resolution. Although some people claim their bokeh is less pleasant. Many like MC 44-3 version which is MC, preset and has 8 aperture blades. I personally like MC 44M version but it is extremely hard to find.
The resolution numbers are number of resolved lines at the center/edge of the picture. Higher numbers mean better resolution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
symphonic
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 550 Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
Thanks, dimitrygo! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Univer
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Univer wrote:
Hi All,
Per request (and with apologies for being so slow about it!), I'm adding a few quick snaps to this marvelously helpful thread.
First up: an early Type 1(a) Helios-44 - the version that stops down to f/22 (the aperture ring design is slightly different from the commonly encountered model as well). As the pictures show, this is a lens that has "seen life" (as Matanle might put it), but it produces lovely images. I'll leave to no-X the decision whether to give this model its own number/letter designation (Type 0?), or to subdivide the TYpe 1(a) category.
(Detailed information: lens name in Cyrillic; maximum aperture given as 1:2; focal length given as F=5,8cm; serial number given as No000XXX; red Π symbol present; 13 aperture blades)
Next: a much later lens - a Helios-44-2 that falls into category 1(b) (KMZ, black, colored lettering), but which has a "0" serial number. Since evidence seems to suggest that the Type 1(b) appeared circa 1974, this serial number is a minor mystery. It may or may not be relevant in this connection, but I should note that this lens came to me attached to a Kalimar-rebadged Zenit - an export model.
(Detailed information: lens name in English; maximum aperture/focal length given as 85/2; serial number given as 0XXXXXX; 8 aperture blades)
Finally - and there's nothing really terribly unusual about this one - a Helios-40 that falls into the Type 1 category for this lens, but with a "00" serial number. I thought the image might be useful by way of reference.
(Detailed information: lens name in Cyrillic; maximum aperture given as 1:1,5; focal length given as F=8,5cm; serial number given as No00XXXX; red Π symbol present)
Many thanks to no-X for all his hard work, and for the tremendously useful results!
Cheers,
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010 Posts: 666 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
Very creditable effort and most educational! Well started and many thanks! I look forward to helping in due course. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Univer
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Univer wrote:
Hi All,
Just ran across an "Auto Cosmogon" branded Helios-44M (KMZ) with an odd six-digit 00XXXX serial number. My first thought is that these rebadged lenses must have been assigned a separate series of numbers, and that would account for the "00" here. Do you reckon that makes sense?
Focal length and maximum aperture are also designated differently from the practice I've seen on other 44-Ms. Instead of "58/2", it's "1:2" followed by "F=58mm".
Cheers,
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Phenix jc
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 398 Location: France
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phenix jc wrote:
Hi no-X,
FYI, I have a black HELIOS-40 which exactly looks like a 40-2
Sérial number "N700xxx"
M42 in brown case with the 3 usual B&W filters.
Filter thread 67x0,75
...BUT, I can't use normal 67mm filters on it. (lens nor filters)
I suspect that, despite what is written on the filters, it is still a 66x0,75 thread (!) The thread seems a little too thin or narrow. Strange, isn't it ?
So, I use the filters as lenshood.
One or twice, I've read owners of others HELIOS 40-2 named only 40. _________________ "Plonger les choses dans la lumière, c'est les plonger dans l'infini" Léonard De Vinci
f/1.2 club Zuiko : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Rokkor : 50/1.2, 58/1.2 Nikkor : 50/1.2, 55/1.2 Third Party : Porst(Fujinon-X) 50/1.2, Porst 55/1.2 Canon : S 50/1.2, nFD 50/1.2, FL 55/1.2, R 58/1.2, nFD 85/1.2 Hexanon : 57/1.2 Nokton : 50/1.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hari
Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Posts: 1790
Expire: 2015-05-27
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hari wrote:
Thought it might be nice to see a few Helios 44's and 77's in one box
[very quick and dirty - don't mind the bad quality of the images - will replace them with nicer ones when I get back home]
_________________
Analogue Rangefinders: Leica M5, Leica M6 Titanium classic 0.72, Leica M7 0.58, Leica M7 0.85
Digital Rangefinder: Leica M9, Leica Monochrom, Leica M240
SLR: Leica R3 electronic, Canon AE1P
DSLR: Canon 5D MK2
M mount Lenses: Super-Wide Heliar 15/f4.5 ASPH. + Leica 24/f3.8 ASPH + Leica 28/f2 ASPH. + Leica 35/f1.4 ASPH. FLE + Leica Noctilux 50/f0.95 + Leica Noctilux 50/f1 + Canon 50/f1.2 LTM + Leica 50/f1.4 ASPH. + Leica 50/f1.5 + Zeiss ZM Sonnar 50/f1.5 + Leica APO Summicron 50/f2 + Leica Summitar 50/f2 + Leica Rigid Summicron 50/f2 + Zeiss ZM Planar 50/f2 + Leica 50/f2.8 E39 + Leica 75/f1.4 + Leica APO 75/f2 ASPH. + Voigtlander 75/f2.5 + Leica Summarex 85/f1.5 + Leica APO 90/f2 ASPH. + Leica 90/f2 E55 + Leica 90/f2.8 + Leica APO 135/f3.4
Leica R mount Lenses: Leica-R 60/2.8 E55 + Leica-R 80/1.4 E67 + Leica-R 180/4
EF mount Lenses: Canon 50/1.8 II
M42 mount Lenses: Too many
My pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dementedjesus/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
convert1
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Posts: 100 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
convert1 wrote:
It is nice to see so much version of helios 58mm f2, here is one of mine "Helios 44M1 , 2 blades only (cheap version ??)
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/convert1/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hari
Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Posts: 1790
Expire: 2015-05-27
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hari wrote:
convert1 wrote: |
It is nice to see so much version of helios 58mm f2, here is one of mine "Helios 44M1 , 2 blades only (cheap version ??)
|
never seen this animal before ... ! _________________
Analogue Rangefinders: Leica M5, Leica M6 Titanium classic 0.72, Leica M7 0.58, Leica M7 0.85
Digital Rangefinder: Leica M9, Leica Monochrom, Leica M240
SLR: Leica R3 electronic, Canon AE1P
DSLR: Canon 5D MK2
M mount Lenses: Super-Wide Heliar 15/f4.5 ASPH. + Leica 24/f3.8 ASPH + Leica 28/f2 ASPH. + Leica 35/f1.4 ASPH. FLE + Leica Noctilux 50/f0.95 + Leica Noctilux 50/f1 + Canon 50/f1.2 LTM + Leica 50/f1.4 ASPH. + Leica 50/f1.5 + Zeiss ZM Sonnar 50/f1.5 + Leica APO Summicron 50/f2 + Leica Summitar 50/f2 + Leica Rigid Summicron 50/f2 + Zeiss ZM Planar 50/f2 + Leica 50/f2.8 E39 + Leica 75/f1.4 + Leica APO 75/f2 ASPH. + Voigtlander 75/f2.5 + Leica Summarex 85/f1.5 + Leica APO 90/f2 ASPH. + Leica 90/f2 E55 + Leica 90/f2.8 + Leica APO 135/f3.4
Leica R mount Lenses: Leica-R 60/2.8 E55 + Leica-R 80/1.4 E67 + Leica-R 180/4
EF mount Lenses: Canon 50/1.8 II
M42 mount Lenses: Too many
My pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dementedjesus/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
That's really interesting! Same aperture design as the Zenitar MC ME-1 1.7/50mm? That lens was designed for the Zenit 18 and had electronic coupling. The Helios 44m1 doesn't have contacts on the back portion does it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
convert1
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Posts: 100 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
convert1 wrote:
Correct, the helios 44M1 doesn't have any electrical contacts on the back portion, this lens produces very strange bokeh (stop down of course). I guess optical design is the same like another version as well. _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/convert1/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gearsNcogs
Joined: 20 Oct 2010 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
gearsNcogs wrote:
My Helios just came in today, so I decided to snap a couple of shots of it to add to the database.
Helios 44 (Type 1f), 2/58, N0xxxxxx, 8 blades, M42 mount
_________________ Stills: SLR: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP, DSLR: Canon EOS Rebel XTi, Canon EOS 7D
Cine: 16mm: Krasnogorsk-3 (M42 mount) 8mm: Revere Model 88 Super 8: Bell and Howell 1235 XL Filmosonic
MF Lenses: M42: Meteor 5-1 KMZ 17-69mm 1:1,9 (Cine Only), Asahi Super Takumar 50mm 1:1.4, Focal MC 28mm 1:2.8, Tele-Lentar 135mm 1:2.8, Helios-44 KMZ 58mm 1:2, Helios-44-2 KMZ 58mm 1:2 M39: Industar-26M 50mm 1:2.8 F: Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 EF: Lensbaby Composer f2 w/Double Glass Optic, Rokinon 35mm 1:1.4 AS UMC, Rokinon 85mm T1.5 AS IF UMC
AF Lenses: EF-S: Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II, EF: Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 TELE-MACRO (1:2), Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II
Fixed-Focus Lenses: D: Elitar 6.5mm 1:1.9, Wollensak-Revere 13mm 1:2.5 Velostigmat
Last edited by gearsNcogs on Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:27 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
banpei
Joined: 28 Oct 2010 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
banpei wrote:
Mine came in yesterday as well:
A second generation (44-2) zebra lens M42. I basically bought it to compare it with my first generation Helios 44
It also features a nice low serial number: N0000525!
BTW: my other Helios 44 is like the one with the 2 blades but then instead with 8 blades. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gearsNcogs
Joined: 20 Oct 2010 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gearsNcogs wrote:
look at that serial number! _________________ Stills: SLR: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP, DSLR: Canon EOS Rebel XTi, Canon EOS 7D
Cine: 16mm: Krasnogorsk-3 (M42 mount) 8mm: Revere Model 88 Super 8: Bell and Howell 1235 XL Filmosonic
MF Lenses: M42: Meteor 5-1 KMZ 17-69mm 1:1,9 (Cine Only), Asahi Super Takumar 50mm 1:1.4, Focal MC 28mm 1:2.8, Tele-Lentar 135mm 1:2.8, Helios-44 KMZ 58mm 1:2, Helios-44-2 KMZ 58mm 1:2 M39: Industar-26M 50mm 1:2.8 F: Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 EF: Lensbaby Composer f2 w/Double Glass Optic, Rokinon 35mm 1:1.4 AS UMC, Rokinon 85mm T1.5 AS IF UMC
AF Lenses: EF-S: Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II, EF: Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 TELE-MACRO (1:2), Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II
Fixed-Focus Lenses: D: Elitar 6.5mm 1:1.9, Wollensak-Revere 13mm 1:2.5 Velostigmat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
banpei
Joined: 28 Oct 2010 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
banpei wrote:
gearsNcogs wrote: |
look at that serial number! |
That means either good quality because the workers were still focused on their work or low quality because they were still trying to get it right!
I must say the quality of the picture is better than my earlier 44M _________________ Seriously Helios 44 addicted
--
Zenit-E (x3) / Zenit 12XP (x2) / Praktica FX / Mamiya MSX500 / Praktica LTL3 / Zenit-EM
Helios 44M / Helios 44 / Helios 44-2 / Helios 44-4 (x2) / Helios 77M / Mir 1 37mm / SMC Takumar 28mm / Mamiya 50mm / Pentacon 50mm / Carl Zeiss (aus Jena) Tessar 50mm
SLR: Zenit-E, Praktica LTL3, Praktica FX, Zenit-EM, Mamiya MSX500
Lenses
Helios m42: 44M 2/58, 44 2/58, 44-2 2/58, 44-4 2/58, 77M-4 1.8/50
Mir m42: 37/2.8
Takumar m42: 28/3.5, 35/3.5
Vivitar m42: 35/2.8, 135/2.8
Mamiya m42: 50/2, 28/2.8
Other m42: Pentacon 1.8/50, Panagor 4.5/80-200
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I updated the list a bit... I splitted Helios-44 version 1a to two groups: 1a now means the f/22 model and 1b means f/16 model. Many thanks to Univer for pointing this difference. Btw. it seems quite likely, that some rebadged lenses were marked by different serial numbers...
Hari: If you will be bored, could you share serials of the lenses? E.g. 44k-4 MC: 84xxx... ?
convert1: very interesting lens... I added it to the list - could you find its serial number?
banpei: I think the zero at the begining means it was made in 1970... maybe it's 525th lens made in MMZ factory during 1970? _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alegen
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alegen wrote:
M means that lens has instant-return(auto) diaphragm
http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-diaphragm.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
As for Helios and Mir lenses - both "K" and "M" lenses have automatic diaphragm. But K-marked Helios lenses have K-mount, while M-lenses have M42 mount (and H/N for Nikon mount).
As for Jupiters, some M-marked models have automatic diaphragm (21M), others have pre-set system (37AM). According to some rumours, M can mean "modern" regarding Jupiters. _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alegen
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alegen wrote:
I've just translated info from the link above:
Quote: |
Первоначально термин "моргающая диафрагма" применялся только для резьбовых объективов, имеющих нажимную диафрагму по вышеуказанной терминологии. Термин "моргающая диафрагма" остался в индексе "М", которым маркируются резьбовые (M42x1) объективы с нажимной диафрагмой. Такие объективы имеют в оправе подпружиненный штырек, через который передается усилие на закрытие диафрагмы. |
Quote: |
Байонетные объективы со своими стандартными приводами диафрагмы маркируются иным образом -- по типу байонета ("K", "Н" и т.д.) |
"M" means screwmount lens with automatic diaphragm, bayonet type lenses marked by K, H etc. For example, Helios-44 and 44-2 are M42 lenses but there is no "M" in their names cause they do not have automatic diaphragm. Helios-44M is M42 lens with automatic diaphragm thats why there is "M" in the end. As for Jupiter you are right. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
banpei
Joined: 28 Oct 2010 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
banpei wrote:
no-X wrote: |
banpei: I think the zero at the begining means it was made in 1970... maybe it's 525th lens made in MMZ factory during 1970? |
That is correct: the Zenit E it used to be on was manufacured in 1970 as well. _________________ Seriously Helios 44 addicted
--
Zenit-E (x3) / Zenit 12XP (x2) / Praktica FX / Mamiya MSX500 / Praktica LTL3 / Zenit-EM
Helios 44M / Helios 44 / Helios 44-2 / Helios 44-4 (x2) / Helios 77M / Mir 1 37mm / SMC Takumar 28mm / Mamiya 50mm / Pentacon 50mm / Carl Zeiss (aus Jena) Tessar 50mm
SLR: Zenit-E, Praktica LTL3, Praktica FX, Zenit-EM, Mamiya MSX500
Lenses
Helios m42: 44M 2/58, 44 2/58, 44-2 2/58, 44-4 2/58, 77M-4 1.8/50
Mir m42: 37/2.8
Takumar m42: 28/3.5, 35/3.5
Vivitar m42: 35/2.8, 135/2.8
Mamiya m42: 50/2, 28/2.8
Other m42: Pentacon 1.8/50, Panagor 4.5/80-200
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alegen
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alegen wrote:
The earliest Helios-44 I ever saw:
Export Helos-44 by MMZ "Zebra" with strange number 90XXXXX:
Homemade hood for Helios-44. Looks funny, works good! =)
White cap on the left used for Custom WB.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1888 Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:06 pm Post subject: Re: Complete list of Helios lenses - getting closer |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
no-X wrote: |
If you have some SLR Helios lenses, which are not pictured or mentioned, you can help by sharing this info: |
Here are some pictures of my Helios-81N, from my recent thread about it:
http://forum.mflenses.com/mc-helios-81n-50-2-and-nikon-50-1-8-series-e-comparison-t34101.html
Information:
Name: Helios-81N
Labeling: "MC гелиос-81н 2/50"
Special symbols: Zavod Arsenal logo
Serial number: 8925xxx
Aperture blades: 6
System: Nikon F (Kiev 17/19/20/19M bodies)
(shown next to a Nikon 50/1.8 Series E for a size reference... let me know if you would like a shot of just the Helios on its own) _________________ Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|