View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rense
Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Posts: 250 Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rense wrote:
Take a look at the site of Jim Galli. _________________ [5D][20D][50D][70D][EOS-M][Tamron Adaptall lenses][M42 lenses]
for complete gearlist, click here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dakoo
Joined: 08 Mar 2008 Posts: 603
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dakoo wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Superb!
|
This commands utmost Respect...
You can feel the shot .... _________________ Yashica ML 2.4/24, ML 2.4./28,
Zeiss Distagon 35/1.4, Planer 1.4/50, Planer 1.7/50,
SMC Tak 1.4/50,Tessar 2.8/50, Jupiter2/85
CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200
Canon Tns 24/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Andy, your dog is the photogenic specimen of canine kind. Someday I need
Biogon 35/2 ZM, it has my kind of bokeh similar to G-Planar 2/45 IMHO.
thePiRaTE!! (your HN is hard to type )
Planar 55/1.2 has nice bokeh, but it does produce Nisen-bokeh (Double line
bokeh) at certain situations. That is common to all those fast lenses I guess. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mechan1k
Joined: 15 Nov 2008 Posts: 6 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mechan1k wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Superb!
|
Simply unbelievable.
This is a surreal image ... would have to be THE MOST 3D like image I have seen.
Amazing capture indeed ...
I could only wish to capture something like that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
I vote for: Macro Planar 2/100 and #37...the planes of the daisies really are augmented by the depth of field and fine bokeh.
And ALL of these just blow me away!
Voytek: I can't say enough for the Sankyo Kohki S-Komura, M42 Uni auto mount 2.5/100; marvelous...
And I agree with the comments about your dog, Andy. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mechan1k
Joined: 15 Nov 2008 Posts: 6 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mechan1k wrote:
I find the bokeh can be pleasing ... and a little weird at time with some of my Super Takumars as well ... mainly my 85mm f/1.9
I can really produce some dreamy effects though.
_________________ Cheers Simon : http://mechan1k.zenfolio.com/
Pentax K10D x2 : DA 18-55mm : FA50 f/1.4 : FA J 75-300mm : Genuine M42 adaptor x2
Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di macro : x1.4 AF Teleconverter :
Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 EX : EF 530 DG Super : Zenitar 16mm f/2,8 F/E
M42 Super Taks 28/3.5 : 35/3.5 : 55/1.8 : 85/1.9 : 105/2.8 : 135/3.5 : 200/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Here comes bokeh again, almost lost the thread.
It is hard to search good shots with bokeh, since the most of nice photos are on my HP,
i managed to find the fresh ones for you. Some shots are old, but new for you.
Canon lenses.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56. barber shop in Toronto downtown, $4 for men's hair cut and $6 and up for women!!!
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
51 & 52 Canon 50/1.2 L-mount (M fast and fat lens
53 & 54 Canon 50/1.8 L-mount (M cute little lens and pretty good, recommended
55 & 56 FD 35/2 films don't know much about this lens
57 & 58 FD 50/1.8 S.C. films ditto
59 & 60 FD 50/1.2 S.S.C. converted to EF-mount (5D) fast and much fatter lens than 50/1.2L
61 & 62 Summicron-M 35 ASPH 61(M, 62(film) hard to find bokeh shots for this lens _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses
Last edited by koji on Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:32 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Leica lenses, of course I do not have many (sorry ).
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
63 & 64 Elmarit-R 35 (last version) every 35mm is compared against (pretty good lens)
65 & 66 Sumilux-R 50 (E55) one previous version (pretty good too)
67 & 68 Summicron-R 50 very famous all rounder
69 & 70 Macro Elmarit 60 hard to find bokeh shots (normally not used for bokeh)
71 & 72 Elmarit-R 90 one of very good bokeh lens and sharp
Any one of these lenses are PRETTY good to me, and the most of then have good bokeh too.
I do not use them much somehow, feel like the lens makes the photo not by me. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
All are great ones! Many thanks guys!
#63 is simple outstanding to me. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Seeing the results of those Leica lenses is easy for everyone to understand why they are so much evaluated!
Just outstanding.
I own three of those myself (the Elmarit-R 35 and 90 and the Summicron-R 50)
What cameras did you shoot these photos with? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
The best of the best; LEICA M lenses.
No more words. LEICA M (Zeiss, go bye)
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I wish to see sometimes Leica M, now I am really doubt about that I am sure rangefinder provide better quality than SLR perhaps this is the key. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Anyway the above photos are Leica-R _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Oh sorry, I forgot to add Leica M-lens (only one I have).
Only shots with bokeh in here, hardly any other bokeh shot.
@Orio, Elmarit-R 35 and 90 shots were with film, other with EOS_5D.
73.
74.
I did not like this lens with film, used only twice (means 2 rolls of films)
for the past more than ten years. Started using it again with M8, which is somehow
a good match. Its small size is really nice for travel. Here is more (no bokeh).
These are shot with M8 + UV/IR cut filter and mostly @f8 as far as I remember.
in Posnan Porland
in Warshawa
in Krakow
in Budapest Hungary
Certainly M-lens has good quality, so does some of Cosina Voiglander ones.
But my experience is only with this M35 ASPH. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Thanks much Koji for showing these images!
It is rare to find people with Leica M lenses and even more to have them post their pictures.
I appreciate these M 35mm aspherical Leica lens, but if I compare it with what I saw from Zeiss Biogon 2/35, I have to say that the Biogon has MUCH more personality and signature.
This Leica seems to produce excellent quality picture but I do not see much of a personality in this lens. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Exacto, Orio. Also this lens has uber-contrast, which hates me too.
I do not own Biogon 35/2 ZM, but I like Zeiss or Cosina lenses so far
and they are gentle to my wallet too. (I want that Biogon 35/2.)
Y'know I am a fixed income retired guy. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses
Last edited by koji on Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 416 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
koji wrote: |
Here comes bokeh again, almost lost the thread. ...
52.
59.
51 & 52 Canon 50/1.2 L-mount (M fast and fat lens
59 & 60 FD 50/1.2 S.S.C. converted to EF-mount (5D) fast and much fatter lens than 50/1.2L ... |
52 for teh win.
I sense a trend in my tastes. I love the cats-eye spherical swirl effect. It draws the viewer into the center of the frame. Can only get this with generous f1.4's or wider apertures that I've seen. Nice ones! Thanks for posting. _________________ kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voytek
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 891
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
in Poznan Poland, _________________ Cheers, Voytek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Uh, my bad. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Some old bokeh test shots with the SMC Pentax-FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited. I'm not sure if it has a good bokeh, but it's a great lens nonetheless
_________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Here comes Yashica's. There is no Bokeh shot for ML21/3.5, ML24/2.8, and ML28/2.8.
By the way I do not make photos for the sake of bokeh, it happened to have bokeh as
a back ground. Some day I will make bokeh shots for the above lenses.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
75 & 76 DSB 50/1.9 pretty sharp lens (I guess same as ML50/1.9 without multi-coating)
77 & 78 YUS DS 50/2 USA only version
79 & 80 ML 55/4 macro (originally designed as micro fiche copy machine???)
81 & 82 ML 55/2.8 macro faster version of ML55/4, I do not see much difference
83 & 84 ML 100/3.5 macro (I suspect this lens is the same as Y/C 100/3.5, of course my wild guess. )
85 & 86 ML 50/2 I do not have much comment for this lens
87 & 88 ML 50/1.9 Yes, this lens is sharp.
89 & 90 ML 50/1.7 almost same as ML 50/2, not much comment/impression
91 & 92 ML 50/1.4 my recommended lens for many people
93 & 94 ML 50/1.2 faster version of ML 50/1.4 (this lens is sharp thou indeed) _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the_Suede
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 67 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
the_Suede wrote:
Thank you again, Koji, for these excellent captures! That really is some collection of lenses you have (and some cataloging skill and perseverence too!) What bodies do you use them on? _________________ You REALLY should have taken the blue pill... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2107 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
The most of shots so far were done with EOS_5D, which can mount
various mount lenses except Minolta SR-mount lens. I do not own
any K-mount, nor AR-mount (Konica), but some are with films for
older pics. The most of shots by L and M-mount lenses are done by M8.
Cataloguing is PITA. I have finally made like this (it took two or three years..)
lens ... brand A --- lens 1 -- YYMMDD's shots
....................................... -- YYMMDD's shots (if too many in the same year, i create
.................................................................... higher directory of YYYY or YY/MM
........................ --- lens 2 --- YYMMDD's shots
...................................... --- Flowers or some special case
........... brand B --- lens 1
........................ --- lens 2 in ascending order of focal length then
......................................... in ascending f-stop # order for same FL lenses
Exception of M42 proper lenses and some uncategorical(?) brand,
like third party lens or odd and only one such as Fuji TX-1 (panorama cam).
It is actually almost exactly same as Mac' iPhoto directory structure internally in the lowest level,
I used to hate and even now so about "iPhoto". Ironically the final goal of efficiency is (or seems)
emerging to the same point, which I do not like neither.
(background: I used to do programming in Unix/Linux for a special computer language called APL.
Yes, I did more in the IBM's mainframe assembler programming for the above language. TaDah...) _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
koji wrote: |
The most of shots so far were done with EOS_5D, which can mount
various mount lenses except Minolta SR-mount lens. I do not own
any K-mount, nor AR-mount (Konica), but some are with films for
older pics. The most of shots by L and M-mount lenses are done by M8.
Cataloguing is PITA. I have finally made like this (it took two or three years..)
lens ... brand A --- lens 1 -- YYMMDD's shots
....................................... -- YYMMDD's shots (if too many in the same year, i create
.................................................................... higher directory of YYYY or YY/MM
........................ --- lens 2 --- YYMMDD's shots
...................................... --- Flowers or some special case
........... brand B --- lens 1
........................ --- lens 2 in ascending order of focal length then
......................................... in ascending f-stop # order for same FL lenses
Exception of M42 proper lenses and some uncategorical(?) brand,
like third party lens or odd and only one such as Fuji TX-1 (panorama cam).
It is actually almost exactly same as Mac' iPhoto directory structure internally in the lowest level,
I used to hate and even now so about "iPhoto". Ironically the final goal of efficiency is (or seems)
emerging to the same point, which I do not like neither.
(background: I used to do programming in Unix/Linux for a special computer language called APL.
Yes, I did more in the IBM's mainframe assembler programming for the above language. TaDah...) |
Assembler programmer I don't know many you are second one what I ever met! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
soikka
Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Posts: 534 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
soikka wrote:
Great samples!
Liked the bokeh oh these the best:
77 & 78 YUS DS 50/2 USA only version
85 & 86 ML 50/2 I do not have much comment for this lens
87 & 88 ML 50/1.9 Yes, this lens is sharp.
89 & 90 ML 50/1.7 almost same as ML 50/2, not much comment/impression _________________ DSLR: K-5,K20d+Grip, Ist*Ds
Film: MZ-5n, LX, MX+winder, SuperA+winder, ME Super,
M-series: 28/2.8, 35/2, 40/2.8, 135/3.5, 75-150/4, A-series: 50/1.7, Super-Taks: 55/1.8, 105/2.8, S-M-C Taks: 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, Sigma SW2 24/2.8, Tamron SPs: 90/2.5(I), 180/2.5, 500/8, Rikenon XR 35-70/3.5, Cosinon 40/2.5, F-1.7x AF-adapter, Olympus XA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|