View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
Also picked up a Minox 35ML for a mere tenner from a local charity shop. Seems to be fully working but yet to put any film thru it. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sceptic
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sceptic wrote:
Vivitar 20/3.8 (Kiron) for 14 USD. Dented filter ring and small scratches/marks on the front glass, but still. Also a Paragon 55/2.8 1:1 macro for 28 USD. That one needs relubing, which will probably be somewhat of a challenge. _________________ Sony A7R and wildly varying flora of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I've been waiting for the longest to get a digital camera I can use my Canon FD lenses with and when the Sony A7/A7r came out, I thought that that would be the one. Well, I finally raised the funds for an A7r and went down to my local camera shop to see if they had one that I could try out. They didn't have the r version but they did have the A7, and I reasoned that was close enough, so I tried it out in the shop. I was taken aback by the viewfinder image, first of all. It may be high rez, but it's no substitute for a good FF viewfinder. I kept focusing on subjects and wondering why they weren't sharper, then I realized finally that they were in focus, but that the viewfinder wasn't delivering that crisp edge you see when something is sharply in focus. That gave me pause. Then the sales guy pointed out what he thought was a significant drawback, and that was its frame rate when shooting a moving target. It was abysmally slow, maybe 1.5 fps, tops. And if I recall the spec info correctly, the A7r is even slower (because of all those extra megapixels I'm figuring). So that made me take a step back. In the past I did a lot of motorsports photography and this is something I would like to do again once I've got a good digital rig to do it with. And a frame rate that slow, with a totally blacked out viewfinder/LCD screen in between shots was just not acceptable. So dang! There went my hopes of a FF mirrorless out the window.
So I fell back to the next best thing, the Sony NEX 7, and started keeping my eyes on eBay auctions. I found one, for $550 with free shipping that had received no bids. Came with the box, the 18-55 lens and an extra battery. Since his opening price was hundreds less than what most others were asking (and getting), I expected the bid amount to go higher. But nobody placed another bid. I waited until the last few seconds, still with no bids, and placed mine at a price that I'd be willing to pay. Heh. I was the only bidder. So I got a nice, clean NEX 7 kit for what to me at least was a very good price. I haven't taken any pics of it yet, but you can see it here:
Click here to see on Ebay
Still getting the hang of it. Wish Sony would have supplied a printed handbook with the camera, instead of putting it on CD-ROM. I find having to load it up in my computer, instead of having a hard copy handy, much less than convenient. So maybe to get to FF I'll buy a Metabones or such for it. I dunno yet. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
doomed-forever
Joined: 09 Aug 2014 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
doomed-forever wrote:
I snapped a Tokina AT-X 28-85mm/3.5-4.5 Lens for 13.50 EUR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
So I fell back to the next best thing, the Sony NEX 7, and started keeping my eyes on eBay auctions. . |
What about A6000? A6000 is the most complete mirrorless Camera Sony have released. Much faster than the A7 series in every aspect. There is also rumors now about new FF mirrorless models from Sony in early 2015. Faster like the A6000... _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
doomed-forever
Joined: 09 Aug 2014 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
doomed-forever wrote:
AF Speed is not everything, for instance, the A6000 Body is entirely made of plastic, whereas the NEX-6 before was mostly inside a Alu-Magnesium Body Shell Alloy...i prefer that, and rumors say next feb will be the A7000 released, the "true" NEX-7 successor, with A6000 AF and again Alu-Mag Body, 3 Dial Operation just like the NEX-7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
Michael: Is it possible that the diopter-correction on that a7 was set totally wrong for your eyes? I had that same issue when testing mine and after setting it up correctly I am very satisfied with the viewfinder - as I am with the camera itself. It's just like having my old Pentax ME again... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jvg
Joined: 07 Nov 2012 Posts: 205 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jvg wrote:
Would fully working Nikomat (japanese version Nikkormat) FTN with Nikkor H 85/1.8 for $75 be considered as a bargain? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gamera
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 86 Location: Scandinavia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gamera wrote:
Jvg wrote: |
Would fully working Nikomat (japanese version Nikkormat) FTN with Nikkor H 85/1.8 for $75 be considered as a bargain? |
Not really. But the good news is that I am willing to cover Your losses. Send the lot to me and I will pay the postage and $75...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
b0ddo
Joined: 26 Aug 2014 Posts: 2 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
b0ddo wrote:
My only real bargain until now is the Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8. I bought it for 2.5 euros, mainly to use the caps for the 105 f/2.5 AI (which cost me 125$, so not really a bargain that one).
This little micro-nikkor was damadged: the focus ring would not move at all.
I thaught of having a go at fixing it. Atfer a week and 4 attempts, I unscrewd almost everything, even the helicoids, degreased them, lubed them and put them back together. After a few tries, I managed to put the helicoids in the right position to have infinite focus and 0.25m focus distance as well. The only drawback is that i left marks on the mount ring while creating new groves for those 3 screws... and it focuses a little bit past infinity... but i'm not dissasembling it again... despite being a quick simple fix... i hope.
I think this qualifies as a bargain. 2.5 euros and the opportunity of dissasembling a very complicated lens (being a macro) without being nervous of damaging it even further. I rarely uset it, though. I preffer my 50mm 1.4 G and i'm not much into macro. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:19 am Post subject: Roeschlein-Kreuznach Telenar 1:3,8 / 90mm |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
I'm not really shure if this is a real bargain, but it's a rare lens for not too much money: 22,50€ incl. delivery. It was announced as M42 but it is a M39 with a quite long register-distance, not Leica Mount. It was announced to have major scratches on both lens and tubus - which it hadn't, at least in my book. Will have to check for an adapter to make it fit, seems to belong to a Braun Paxette. If it isn't a bargain its at least a not too expensive rare lens.
For the bargains: a Yashica 1.9/50 for 5€ at the flew-market. And, if I haven't mentioned it here, a Praktica FX with Primoplan 1.9/58 for 62€ and a Panagor 2.8/80 1:1 macro for (if I remember right) under 60€.
Got me an adapter for the roeschlein which will ship from the US. Now it's not such a bargain anymore (costs as much as the lens), will have to find some other Paxette lenses
Last edited by malaclypse on Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Basilisk
Joined: 21 Mar 2013 Posts: 356 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basilisk wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
I've been waiting for the longest to get a digital camera I can use my Canon FD lenses with and when the Sony A7/A7r came out, I thought that that would be the one. Well, I finally raised the funds for an A7r and went down to my local camera shop to see if they had one that I could try out. They didn't have the r version but they did have the A7, and I reasoned that was close enough, so I tried it out in the shop. I was taken aback by the viewfinder image, first of all. It may be high rez, but it's no substitute for a good FF viewfinder. I kept focusing on subjects and wondering why they weren't sharper, then I realized finally that they were in focus, but that the viewfinder wasn't delivering that crisp edge you see when something is sharply in focus. That gave me pause. Then the sales guy pointed out what he thought was a significant drawback, and that was its frame rate when shooting a moving target. It was abysmally slow, maybe 1.5 fps, tops. And if I recall the spec info correctly, the A7r is even slower (because of all those extra megapixels I'm figuring). So that made me take a step back. In the past I did a lot of motorsports photography and this is something I would like to do again once I've got a good digital rig to do it with. And a frame rate that slow, with a totally blacked out viewfinder/LCD screen in between shots was just not acceptable. So dang! There went my hopes of a FF mirrorless out the window. |
The refresh rate and sharpness of viewfinder image are going to take a hit in low light inevitably, especially if stopped down. Were you able to try in brighter light? There is some complex processing going on to simulate actual exposure in the EVF. People do get good results with these cameras in low light, but maybe not with night-time motorsports. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hemeterfilms
Joined: 04 Jul 2012 Posts: 80 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hemeterfilms wrote:
I was negotiating with a dealer herein Mexico City for a very nice Mamiya C330f (nice example and got it for a good price) when he decided to sweeten the deal by throwing in a Minolta X 370s. That was a clincher and when I got home I realised that not only was it in perfect working condition but had an MD Rokkor 50mm f1.4 attached ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
doomed-forever wrote: |
AF Speed is not everything, for instance, the A6000 Body is entirely made of plastic, whereas the NEX-6 before was mostly inside a Alu-Magnesium Body Shell Alloy...i prefer that, and rumors say next feb will be the A7000 released, the "true" NEX-7 successor, with A6000 AF and again Alu-Mag Body, 3 Dial Operation just like the NEX-7. |
A6000 plastic? It's not as plastic as my NEX5, I thought it had a metal body shell. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Whatever the A6000 is made of, it's strong enough. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Hesketh
Joined: 23 Oct 2014 Posts: 6 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roger Hesketh wrote:
Are large format bargains allowed? If so.
8 x 10 Linhof Color Karden with recessed and flat front lens panels. Compendium lens hood. 8x10 and 5x7 backs, 5x7 reducing back, 4 8x10 Fidelity holders, 8 Eastman Kodak 5x7 holders and a dark cloth. £40
Fatif Studio stand also £40
Both the above lots were on Ebay UK. I was the only bidder. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Roger Hesketh wrote: |
Are large format bargains allowed? If so.
8 x 10 Linhof Color Karden with recessed and flat front lens panels. Compendium lens hood. 8x10 and 5x7 backs, 5x7 reducing back, 4 8x10 Fidelity holders, 8 Eastman Kodak 5x7 holders and a dark cloth. £40
Fatif Studio stand also £40
Both the above lots were on Ebay UK. I was the only bidder. |
Definitely.
Well done.
Is it complete with lens?
If so you might like this little advice from another forum if you were not aware of it already:
First thing to be aware of is the operation of a Compur air braked shutter. Don't try to cock the shutter and fire it on the B or T settings, or you'll strip it. You only need to cock it for the timed settings.
Cheers
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Hesketh
Joined: 23 Oct 2014 Posts: 6 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roger Hesketh wrote:
No lens with the camera but I have a 12" Gundlach Turner Reich Convertible mounted in a Wollensak Betax 4 shutter I can use with it. Which come to think of it I bought that rather well too, for $125, about £60 it was then. That was about 10 years ago though when film photography equipment was much cheaper.
Thanks for the info about the Compur shutter. The camera saw service in your part of the world at the University of Adelaide. The chap I bought it off bought it from them. I would not have liked to have paid to ship it to the UK that is for sure. The camera on it's own weighs I think about 10kg.
I also have a 5x7 version of the same camera I bought minus the front panels and back for £32. I use the front panels and 5x7 back that came with the 8x10 camera on that. Not used the 8x10 yet. Just too heavy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Roger Hesketh wrote: |
No lens with the camera but I have a 12" Gundlach Turner Reich Convertible mounted in a Wollensak Betax 4 shutter I can use with it. Which come to think of it I bought that rather well too, for $125, about £60 it was then. That was about 10 years ago though when film photography equipment was much cheaper.
Thanks for the info about the Compur shutter. The camera saw service in your part of the world at the University of Adelaide. The chap I bought it off bought it from them. I would not have liked to have paid to ship it to the UK that is for sure. The camera on it's own weighs I think about 10kg.
I also have a 5x7 version of the same camera I bought minus the front panels and back for £32. I use the front panels and 5x7 back that came with the 8x10 camera on that. Not used the 8x10 yet. Just too heavy. |
Sounds like you will have a good setup.
Yes Adelaide is sort of in my part of the world inasmuch as we are in the same country.
It is quite the trip, although I have driven there.
It is a bit like saying that if you live in London - Split (Croatia) is in your part of the world - Haha
Have fun with your 10X8
OH[/i] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Got an Olympus 4cm f/2.8 LTM for a decent price! _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 393 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
Just bought a Soligor-branded Kiron 105/2.8 macro and a Minolta MC 28/2.5 (supposed to be sharper than my 28/2.0, I'm gonna have to test that...) for 40€ each incl. shipping. _________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Layer-cake
Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 560 Location: Cape Town
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Layer-cake wrote:
I'm quite proud of this one, in perfect condition novoflex noflexar 35mm 3.5 factory Nikon conversion lens for £5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
araucaria
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
araucaria wrote:
Nikkor DC 40/4 and Nikkor HC 75/2.8 for bronica each for 70€. Still looking for a bronica but they are beautiful. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 Posts: 393 Location: Bremen, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
Maybe we should rename this thread to "My lastest acquisition (at a fairly good price)"...
There's nothing wrong with that but maybe everyone could share their one biggest-ever bargain (and maybe a runner-up)...
My biggest bargain ever is this, all bought from the same seller within two days:
- Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 Fisheye (Pentax K)
- Tokina SL 17mm f/3.5 (Pentax K)
- Soligor 17mm f/4 (Minolta MC)
- Kiron 24mm f/2.0 (Pentax K)
- Vivitar Series 1 28mm f/1.9 (M42)
- Revuenon/Tomoika 55mm f/1.2 (M42)
- Helios 40-2 85mm f/1.5 (M42)
- Vivitar Series 1 135mm f/2.3 (M42)
- Soligor C/D 135mm f/2.0 (M42)
- Revueflex 3000 SL (= Chinon CX, M42)
All in mint condition (very rarely - possibly never - used) with complete original packaging and all accessories, I paid 310€ altogether.
(and here's how that happened: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/10-pentax-slr-lens-discussion/227786-i-cant-believe-my-luck.html)
My runner-up (and winner by cost/resale-value ratio) is a Minolta MC Rokkor 58mm f/1.2 (the late version with rubberized focus ring) in near-mint condition that I got for 39€. _________________ Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
I got nearly all of my MFL for relatively cheap prices but never on a "steal" level.
My biggest bargain might have been Telemegor 180 M42 for €29 that already paid off. I also won Trioplan 100 EXA for €201 that are very nice money for such a lens nowadays. Also, I bought Tair 133 for €70 app. but I was partly cheated.
Anyway, Boris, do you need that Helios 40? _________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|