Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

what are the biggest bargains you have found?
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Manual Focus Lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I just bought a Zenit 12XP with a Helios 44M-4 lens for about $9 at a pawn shop in Zagreb.
They had a Praktica VLC3 with a Pentacon 50/1.8 for the same money but I was a bit too late and that was a few months ago.
This camera is in great condition! Lens is mint!!! I couldn't believe myself when I bought it...
Now I just need to replace the batteries (or put some tinfoil in the battery compartment heheheh)


PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Two non-Ai Nikkors, 50/1.4 and 28/2.0 for about $40.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Not fair. Laughing


PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Probably not that much of a bargain, but I did knock him down from £700 to £500:

Canon EOS 600d, in box
Canon EOS 3000 (35mm film)
Canon 90-300
Canon 28-80
Canon 18-55
Sigma 135-400
Sigma 18-125
Canon Camera Bag
2 x batteries

All in as new condition. I haven't actually seen the lot yet but I know the seller and it all belonged to his recently deceased mother, who also owned one of my Minolta AF film cameras and lens (which are in nearly new condition).

Last edited by skida on Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:11 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Snagged Contax G fit Zeiss 90mm f/2.8 Sonnar for £85 a few weeks back. A good price and, even better, it's the relatively scarce black finish. Has slight mark on the front but it works great on my A7r with the Techart AF adapter Mk3. Rounds out my Zeiss prime kit nicely and fits better visually with my Sony Zeiss 35 & 55 than the silver version would.


PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Also picked up a Minox 35ML for a mere tenner from a local charity shop. Seems to be fully working but yet to put any film thru it.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Vivitar 20/3.8 (Kiron) for 14 USD. Dented filter ring and small scratches/marks on the front glass, but still. Also a Paragon 55/2.8 1:1 macro for 28 USD. That one needs relubing, which will probably be somewhat of a challenge.


PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I've been waiting for the longest to get a digital camera I can use my Canon FD lenses with and when the Sony A7/A7r came out, I thought that that would be the one. Well, I finally raised the funds for an A7r and went down to my local camera shop to see if they had one that I could try out. They didn't have the r version but they did have the A7, and I reasoned that was close enough, so I tried it out in the shop. I was taken aback by the viewfinder image, first of all. It may be high rez, but it's no substitute for a good FF viewfinder. I kept focusing on subjects and wondering why they weren't sharper, then I realized finally that they were in focus, but that the viewfinder wasn't delivering that crisp edge you see when something is sharply in focus. That gave me pause. Then the sales guy pointed out what he thought was a significant drawback, and that was its frame rate when shooting a moving target. It was abysmally slow, maybe 1.5 fps, tops. And if I recall the spec info correctly, the A7r is even slower (because of all those extra megapixels I'm figuring). So that made me take a step back. In the past I did a lot of motorsports photography and this is something I would like to do again once I've got a good digital rig to do it with. And a frame rate that slow, with a totally blacked out viewfinder/LCD screen in between shots was just not acceptable. So dang! There went my hopes of a FF mirrorless out the window.

So I fell back to the next best thing, the Sony NEX 7, and started keeping my eyes on eBay auctions. I found one, for $550 with free shipping that had received no bids. Came with the box, the 18-55 lens and an extra battery. Since his opening price was hundreds less than what most others were asking (and getting), I expected the bid amount to go higher. But nobody placed another bid. I waited until the last few seconds, still with no bids, and placed mine at a price that I'd be willing to pay. Heh. I was the only bidder. So I got a nice, clean NEX 7 kit for what to me at least was a very good price. I haven't taken any pics of it yet, but you can see it here:

Click here to see on Ebay

Still getting the hang of it. Wish Sony would have supplied a printed handbook with the camera, instead of putting it on CD-ROM. I find having to load it up in my computer, instead of having a hard copy handy, much less than convenient. So maybe to get to FF I'll buy a Metabones or such for it. I dunno yet.


PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I snapped a Tokina AT-X 28-85mm/3.5-4.5 Lens for 13.50 EUR


PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
cooltouch wrote:
So I fell back to the next best thing, the Sony NEX 7, and started keeping my eyes on eBay auctions. .


What about A6000? A6000 is the most complete mirrorless Camera Sony have released. Much faster than the A7 series in every aspect. There is also rumors now about new FF mirrorless models from Sony in early 2015. Faster like the A6000...


PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
AF Speed is not everything, for instance, the A6000 Body is entirely made of plastic, whereas the NEX-6 before was mostly inside a Alu-Magnesium Body Shell Alloy...i prefer that, and rumors say next feb will be the A7000 released, the "true" NEX-7 successor, with A6000 AF and again Alu-Mag Body, 3 Dial Operation just like the NEX-7.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Michael: Is it possible that the diopter-correction on that a7 was set totally wrong for your eyes? I had that same issue when testing mine and after setting it up correctly I am very satisfied with the viewfinder - as I am with the camera itself. It's just like having my old Pentax ME again...


PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Would fully working Nikomat (japanese version Nikkormat) FTN with Nikkor H 85/1.8 for $75 be considered as a bargain? Very Happy


PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Jvg wrote:
Would fully working Nikomat (japanese version Nikkormat) FTN with Nikkor H 85/1.8 for $75 be considered as a bargain? Very Happy


Not really. But the good news is that I am willing to cover Your losses. Send the lot to me and I will pay the postage and $75...


Cool


PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
My only real bargain until now is the Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8. I bought it for 2.5 euros, mainly to use the caps for the 105 f/2.5 AI (which cost me 125$, so not really a bargain that one).

This little micro-nikkor was damadged: the focus ring would not move at all.

I thaught of having a go at fixing it. Atfer a week and 4 attempts, I unscrewd almost everything, even the helicoids, degreased them, lubed them and put them back together. After a few tries, I managed to put the helicoids in the right position to have infinite focus and 0.25m focus distance as well. The only drawback is that i left marks on the mount ring while creating new groves for those 3 screws... and it focuses a little bit past infinity... but i'm not dissasembling it again... despite being a quick simple fix... i hope.

I think this qualifies as a bargain. 2.5 euros and the opportunity of dissasembling a very complicated lens (being a macro) without being nervous of damaging it even further. I rarely uset it, though. I preffer my 50mm 1.4 G Very Happy and i'm not much into macro.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:19 am    Post subject: Roeschlein-Kreuznach Telenar 1:3,8 / 90mm Reply with quote
I'm not really shure if this is a real bargain, but it's a rare lens for not too much money: 22,50€ incl. delivery. It was announced as M42 but it is a M39 with a quite long register-distance, not Leica Mount. It was announced to have major scratches on both lens and tubus - which it hadn't, at least in my book. Will have to check for an adapter to make it fit, seems to belong to a Braun Paxette. If it isn't a bargain its at least a not too expensive rare lens.

For the bargains: a Yashica 1.9/50 for 5€ at the flew-market. And, if I haven't mentioned it here, a Praktica FX with Primoplan 1.9/58 for 62€ and a Panagor 2.8/80 1:1 macro for (if I remember right) under 60€.

Got me an adapter for the roeschlein which will ship from the US. Now it's not such a bargain anymore (costs as much as the lens), will have to find some other Paxette lenses Wink

Last edited by malaclypse on Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:56 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
cooltouch wrote:
I've been waiting for the longest to get a digital camera I can use my Canon FD lenses with and when the Sony A7/A7r came out, I thought that that would be the one. Well, I finally raised the funds for an A7r and went down to my local camera shop to see if they had one that I could try out. They didn't have the r version but they did have the A7, and I reasoned that was close enough, so I tried it out in the shop. I was taken aback by the viewfinder image, first of all. It may be high rez, but it's no substitute for a good FF viewfinder. I kept focusing on subjects and wondering why they weren't sharper, then I realized finally that they were in focus, but that the viewfinder wasn't delivering that crisp edge you see when something is sharply in focus. That gave me pause. Then the sales guy pointed out what he thought was a significant drawback, and that was its frame rate when shooting a moving target. It was abysmally slow, maybe 1.5 fps, tops. And if I recall the spec info correctly, the A7r is even slower (because of all those extra megapixels I'm figuring). So that made me take a step back. In the past I did a lot of motorsports photography and this is something I would like to do again once I've got a good digital rig to do it with. And a frame rate that slow, with a totally blacked out viewfinder/LCD screen in between shots was just not acceptable. So dang! There went my hopes of a FF mirrorless out the window.


The refresh rate and sharpness of viewfinder image are going to take a hit in low light inevitably, especially if stopped down. Were you able to try in brighter light? There is some complex processing going on to simulate actual exposure in the EVF. People do get good results with these cameras in low light, but maybe not with night-time motorsports.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I was negotiating with a dealer herein Mexico City for a very nice Mamiya C330f (nice example and got it for a good price) when he decided to sweeten the deal by throwing in a Minolta X 370s. That was a clincher and when I got home I realised that not only was it in perfect working condition but had an MD Rokkor 50mm f1.4 attached !


PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
doomed-forever wrote:
AF Speed is not everything, for instance, the A6000 Body is entirely made of plastic, whereas the NEX-6 before was mostly inside a Alu-Magnesium Body Shell Alloy...i prefer that, and rumors say next feb will be the A7000 released, the "true" NEX-7 successor, with A6000 AF and again Alu-Mag Body, 3 Dial Operation just like the NEX-7.


A6000 plastic? It's not as plastic as my NEX5, I thought it had a metal body shell.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Whatever the A6000 is made of, it's strong enough.


PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Are large format bargains allowed? If so.

8 x 10 Linhof Color Karden with recessed and flat front lens panels. Compendium lens hood. 8x10 and 5x7 backs, 5x7 reducing back, 4 8x10 Fidelity holders, 8 Eastman Kodak 5x7 holders and a dark cloth. £40

Fatif Studio stand also £40

Both the above lots were on Ebay UK. I was the only bidder.


PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Roger Hesketh wrote:
Are large format bargains allowed? If so.

8 x 10 Linhof Color Karden with recessed and flat front lens panels. Compendium lens hood. 8x10 and 5x7 backs, 5x7 reducing back, 4 8x10 Fidelity holders, 8 Eastman Kodak 5x7 holders and a dark cloth. £40

Fatif Studio stand also £40

Both the above lots were on Ebay UK. I was the only bidder.


Definitely.
Well done.
Is it complete with lens?
If so you might like this little advice from another forum if you were not aware of it already:
First thing to be aware of is the operation of a Compur air braked shutter. Don't try to cock the shutter and fire it on the B or T settings, or you'll strip it. You only need to cock it for the timed settings.
Cheers
OH


PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
No lens with the camera but I have a 12" Gundlach Turner Reich Convertible mounted in a Wollensak Betax 4 shutter I can use with it. Which come to think of it I bought that rather well too, for $125, about £60 it was then. That was about 10 years ago though when film photography equipment was much cheaper.

Thanks for the info about the Compur shutter. The camera saw service in your part of the world at the University of Adelaide. The chap I bought it off bought it from them. I would not have liked to have paid to ship it to the UK that is for sure. The camera on it's own weighs I think about 10kg.

I also have a 5x7 version of the same camera I bought minus the front panels and back for £32. I use the front panels and 5x7 back that came with the 8x10 camera on that. Not used the 8x10 yet. Just too heavy.


PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Roger Hesketh wrote:
No lens with the camera but I have a 12" Gundlach Turner Reich Convertible mounted in a Wollensak Betax 4 shutter I can use with it. Which come to think of it I bought that rather well too, for $125, about £60 it was then. That was about 10 years ago though when film photography equipment was much cheaper.

Thanks for the info about the Compur shutter. The camera saw service in your part of the world at the University of Adelaide. The chap I bought it off bought it from them. I would not have liked to have paid to ship it to the UK that is for sure. The camera on it's own weighs I think about 10kg.

I also have a 5x7 version of the same camera I bought minus the front panels and back for £32. I use the front panels and 5x7 back that came with the 8x10 camera on that. Not used the 8x10 yet. Just too heavy.


Sounds like you will have a good setup.
Yes Adelaide is sort of in my part of the world inasmuch as we are in the same country.
It is quite the trip, although I have driven there.
It is a bit like saying that if you live in London - Split (Croatia) is in your part of the world - Haha
Have fun with your 10X8
OH[/i]


PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Got an Olympus 4cm f/2.8 LTM for a decent price! Very Happy
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Home   Manual Focus Lenses
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 76, 77, 78 ... 117, 118, 119  Next
Page 77 of 119