MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
logovectorizer.com
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

Rollei Digibase CN 200 Pro film
Post new topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:53 am
Post subject: Re: Rollei Digibase CN 200 Pro film
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:53 am
Post subject: Re: Rollei Digibase CN 200 Pro film
Reply
Orio wrote:
vilva wrote:
Orio wrote:
This film is the successor of Rollei Scanfilm.
Basically it is a colour film without the orange mask.

It is a monochromatic film for the C41 process, i.e. a B&W film useful if you cannot get real B&W film processed -- any minilab can handle C41.
Veijo


Are you really sure it's B&W ?
ACH...


The PDF states: "Neuer Schwarzweiss-Film zu verarbeiten im Colorprozess C41" = "A new black and white film for processing in the color process C41"

Kodak has a similar C41 B&W film, but I don't know whether it has the orange mask or not.

Veijo


Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:57 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:57 am
Post subject:
Reply
Rollei wrote:
universeller, monochromer Schwarzweiss-Film mit 200 ISO
zu verarbeiten im Colorprozess C41.


Veijo is absolute right


Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:22 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:22 am
Post subject:
Reply
Orio wrote:
Here:
http://www.caddyphoto.com/product_info.php?products_id=436
it says:

Quote:
Rollei DIGIBASE CN 200 PRO est un film couleur sans masque de nouvelle génération.
Rollei DIGIBASE CN 200 PRO permet la numérisation par scanner sans perte des couleurs.


...


It is a color film, i.e. the chemistry is that of a color film but without all the complications of color separation, just the result is monochromatic. So we have a monochromatic color film, not quite the same a normal B&W, but perhaps better than using a standard color negative film and printing in B&W.

Veijo


Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:09 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:09 am
Post subject:
Reply
Ilford do somehing similar called XP2 - I used the original XP1 many years back and if you put it through a mini-lab it came back with an interesting blue or sepia cast.


Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:27 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:27 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Yes like Vejio said its like Ilford XP2 and Kodak BW400 (c-41) , but in the film's presentation (not in the PDF file) is written: "Eigenschaften und Anwendung:

*
unmaskierter Farbfilm;
*
hochauflösender, hochempfindlicher panchromatischer Negativfilm, für Farb- und s/w – Prints geeignet;"

... High-resolution, high pan-chromatic negative film, suitable for color and b / w - prints.

Still , what is mentioned in the PDF file is true, I guess.

About the C41 process BW films, its sad that they are more expensive the color or classic black and white films.


Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:13 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:13 pm
Post subject:
Reply
montecarlo wrote:
Yes like Vejio said its like Ilford XP2 and Kodak BW400 (c-41) , but in the film's presentation (not in the PDF file) is written: "Eigenschaften und Anwendung:

*
unmaskierter Farbfilm;
*
hochauflösender, hochempfindlicher panchromatischer Negativfilm, für Farb- und s/w – Prints geeignet;"

... High-resolution, high pan-chromatic negative film, suitable for color and b / w - prints.


The "color prints" part just means that the film can be put through the normal mini-lab color workflow using the standard color print papers. Stating "pan-chromatic" is meaningless if you are speaking of color reproduction, it is meaningful in the B&W context only, contrasted with e.g. orthochromatic film material.

Veijo


Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:41 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:41 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Richard_D wrote:
Ilford do somehing similar called XP2 - I used the original XP1 many years back and if you put it through a mini-lab it came back with an interesting blue or sepia cast.


Hah! I remember that well. Still got a roll of XP1 400 here somewhere. The non-minilab results were good though.


Post
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Hey, remember this film?
I have just got the first roll from the lab.
Well, I am sorry to say - you were all wrong!
This is indeed a COLOUR film, that is developed in C41 process, and being without the orange mask, delivers a colour negative that looks "strange".

I will post some scans|


Post
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:24 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:24 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Here's a couple of scans.
Photos taken with the G2 and Zeiss Biogon 21

The cathedral of Fidenza (by Benedetto Antelami):


The tower of my father's house - it will become my studio:


Note that these scans were not sharpened after resize (I like them better this way)

A few considerations:

1) the film has LOT of colour grain - looks more like a 800 ISO than a 200 ISO

2) the negative has many blemishes (but I don't know if these are caused by poor manufacturing or by bad machinery in the photolab)

3) in spite of the grain, the film delivers a lot of detail

4) I love the colours - kind of subdued as in a 50s book if you like - surely not something for flashy photography but I like the kind of nostalgic look

5) The contrast is PERFECT for scanning! I didn't have to touch a single slider or value. THe scans came out perfect without the need of ANY adjustment

6) nothing to do with the film, but - THE BIOGON 21 ROCKS!! Very Happy


Post
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:08 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:08 pm
Post subject:
Reply
ChrisLilley wrote:
Orio wrote:
What thrills me about this emulsion is the fact that is optimized for scanning.
This means that we can get a step farther with our full frame film cameras in producing images that can fully disclose the potential of the best lenses that we have.


The next step is oil immersion scanning, of course.


Already there Chris,

Wet mounting. Not uncommon at all, I've done it on my Epson 4870 and it does yield a very nice scan.

Jules


Post
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:45 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:45 am
Post subject:
Reply
The more I scan, the more I become enthusiastic of this film!
From now on I will post the scans in this Gallery thread:
http://forum.mflenses.com/the-cathedral-of-fidenza-t6841.html

-
Post new topic Reply to topic
Goto pagePrevious 1 2 Next
Page 1 of 2