| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2024 4:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
caspert79 wrote:
Just ordered a Minolta MD 24-50/4. It will be a nice set together with my MD 75-150/4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 117
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2024 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
MOG Telemegor 180mm f5.5, MOG Trioplan 100 f2.8 and some used M42 and M39 extension tubes
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 662
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
Even the black/silver Yashinon lenses from that period are beautiful, as were the Mamiya M42 lenses in the same period. The early to mid 60's (imo) are a golden age for lens aesthetics, which extends backwards of course when considering post war European lenses. It's mirrored in many other fields such as automobile design and I wonder if my opinion is objective or tinged with nostalgia that may not be shared by future onlookers. Both cars and lenses have improved remarkably in function since that period, but arguably not aesthetically. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| Alun Thomas wrote: |
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
Even the black/silver Yashinon lenses from that period are beautiful, as were the Mamiya M42 lenses in the same period. The early to mid 60's (imo) are a golden age for lens aesthetics, which extends backwards of course when considering post war European lenses. It's mirrored in many other fields such as automobile design and I wonder if my opinion is objective or tinged with nostalgia that may not be shared by future onlookers. Both cars and lenses have improved remarkably in function since that period, but arguably not aesthetically. |
I don’t think that’s mere nostalgia. Stuff just looked better in those days. And it was made to last a hundred years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pepperberry farm
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pepperberry farm wrote:
Petri CC 55mm f1.4 - supposedly, it has the same elements/groups as the fabled Pancolar 55/1.4.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaveNJ
Joined: 10 May 2024
Posts: 23
Location: NJ
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaveNJ wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
Are you mounting this on a mirrorless camera? If so which adapter? These seem to use the Pentamatic mount and adapters aren't as plentiful except for some no names on eBay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 662
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
| DaveNJ wrote: |
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
Are you mounting this on a mirrorless camera? If so which adapter? These seem to use the Pentamatic mount and adapters aren't as plentiful except for some no names on eBay. |
The silver version came out with the Yashica J5 SLR, a few years after they went to M42 mount. I'm not 100% sure if it's optically identical to the earlier lens, although anecdotal evidence says it is the same as (one version of) the M42 Mamiya 55/1.8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| Alun Thomas wrote: |
| DaveNJ wrote: |
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
Are you mounting this on a mirrorless camera? If so which adapter? These seem to use the Pentamatic mount and adapters aren't as plentiful except for some no names on eBay. |
The silver version came out with the Yashica J5 SLR, a few years after they went to M42 mount. I'm not 100% sure if it's optically identical to the earlier lens, although anecdotal evidence says it is the same as (one version of) the M42 Mamiya 55/1.8. |
AFAIK, there are 3 Mamiya 55/1.8 versions, of which I own 2, that share the same optics. But they are definitely different from the Auto Yashinon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 662
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
There's 4 different version, but only two are in M42 (without the SX tab). They appear to be optically different to each other:
https://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-sekor-auto-55mm-f1-8-lens-m42-screw-fit-t79984,highlight,%2Bmamiya+%2B1+%2B8.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Didn’t know that, thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 117
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
This one? it's a great lens but i like auto yashinon 5cm f2 better
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaveNJ
Joined: 10 May 2024
Posts: 23
Location: NJ
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
DaveNJ wrote:
| Alun Thomas wrote: |
| DaveNJ wrote: |
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
Are you mounting this on a mirrorless camera? If so which adapter? These seem to use the Pentamatic mount and adapters aren't as plentiful except for some no names on eBay. |
The silver version came out with the Yashica J5 SLR, a few years after they went to M42 mount. I'm not 100% sure if it's optically identical to the earlier lens, although anecdotal evidence says it is the same as (one version of) the M42 Mamiya 55/1.8. |
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
starbucklover69
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 46
Location: Swiss
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
starbucklover69 wrote:
I found this all last Weekend in Thriftstore and Fleamarket.
Jupiter 85 f2 , Chinon Auto Tomioka 55 f1.4 and 28 f2.8 , Mamiya Sekor 55 f1.4 and f1.8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 1214
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2024 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
| Chinon Auto Tomioka 55 f1.4 and 28 f2.8 |
Could you show a side and rear profile of the 28mm?
Interesting, for sure!
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014
Posts: 117
Location: Croatia
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
Tokina RMC 24mm f2.8 OM
Makinon 24mm f2.8 FD
Yashica Auto Yashinon 50mm f1.7 M42
Mepota Belar 50mm f4.5 M23 enlarger
...and not in the photo:
Vivitar MC Wide Angle 28mm f2
Ricoh Auto Rikenon 55mm f2.8
Fuji Fujinon 55mm f1.8
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
starbucklover69
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 46
Location: Swiss
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
starbucklover69 wrote:
| Doc Sharptail wrote: |
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
| Chinon Auto Tomioka 55 f1.4 and 28 f2.8 |
Could you show a side and rear profile of the 28mm?
Interesting, for sure!
-D.S. |
Here the Pictures.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| DrBB wrote: |
| caspert79 wrote: |
| Auto Yashinon 5.5cm f/1.8 (silver). A very sexy looking lens IMO. |
This one? it's a great lens but i like auto yashinon 5cm f2 better
|
Yup, it's that one. The 5cm f/2 is one of my favorite lenses, so I will probably agree.
But my 5.5/1.8 looks almost new (and great). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2024 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
After reading a very positive review of the Pentax-M 75-150mm f/4 on ephotozine.com, I decided to buy one. Curious how it compares to the Minolta MD 75-150/4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 1214
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2024 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
| starbucklover69 wrote: |
| Here the Pictures. |
Thanks for posting. Interesting that one of them is marked both Tomioka and Chinon.
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
First one this year because an old search popped up
 Yashica Auto-Yashinon 135mm 1:2.8 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Yashica Auto-Yashinon 135mm 1:2.8 by The lens profile, on Flickr
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gitarzan
Joined: 09 May 2024
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2024 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
gitarzan wrote:
In my hot little hands ... a Hanimar Automatic 28mm f2.8. I picked it up at a nearby used camera shop in the half price section. It was not expensive. Marked down to $20, but they charged me much less. I think they felt sorry for me.
I got it home and popped on an M42 to RF adapter, put it on my camera and shot a couple shots of stuff on my desk, then outside to take picks of my dogs and garden.
I went inside, popped the SD card into the reader on the Mac, and the two pics inside were nice. BUT! Outside was OMG terrible. Hazy and unpleasant. Eew.
So I googled it.  There were several posts out there suggesting this lens to be the worst lens ever. EVER! Apparently, it's uncoated. I read a suggestion on the web to be sure to use a lens hood. So I did. Not any better.
Now it sits in my display case on a Yashica TL-Super with mirror issues. It's just something for me to laugh at myself when I see it.
Now, forthcoming, FEDEX on Saturday, I bought a lot of 9 lenses at auction. Among them,
- FD 135 3.5;
- FD 100-300 f5.6;
- FDn 35-70 F4 zoom;
- FD 35mm 2.8 (that's the one I really wanted);
- a mystery Nikkor Zoom (can't tell - poor photo);
- FDn 70-150 f 4.5; And one in a case upon which all I can see is the word macro. It's a short lens looks like a 50mm. Im hoping it's a 50mm 3.5 macro;
- some other canon lens with only a photo of it with a lens cap, top down.
- AND two Kodak zoom projector lenses.
All except the projector lenses look to be very well cared for. I'll find out Saturday.
In another lot, a Sears camera with a Sears 55mm 1.4 leans on it. Looks nice, clean with a uv filter on it. Those were made by Mamiya-Sekor and are quite sharp. There's a few other things in the lot like an Agfa Silette 1 and a camera bag. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11060
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2024 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Welcome gitarzan! Where are you located?
Looking forward to your results from those lenses!
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3223
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2024 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
@Gitarzan
If you're willing to sell the Canon FD 135/3.5, please send me a PM.
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gitarzan
Joined: 09 May 2024
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2024 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gitarzan wrote:
Visualopsins:
I'm in Dublin, Ohio.
Caspert79:
I may or may not sell the 135. Not sure yet. BUT, if I do, I'll notify you first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
