View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:27 pm Post subject: Some CZ Vario-Sonnar shots |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Hi,
during my today´s evening walk I used only the CZ Vario-Sonnar f:4/80-200mm and CZ Vario-Sonnar f:3.3-4/28-85mm
Below few shots with these lenses and 1DsMkIII.
Thanks for viewing and comments.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tharos
Joined: 03 Nov 2009 Posts: 322 Location: Istanbul/TURKEY
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tharos wrote:
Nice focal length coverage with only 2 lenses and great IQ. Seems like a good setup _________________ Camera : Yashica Electro 35 GS, Canon 450D, Konica C35 AF
28mm : Asahi Pentax SMC Takumar F3.5, Yashica ML F2.8
35mm : Distagon F2.8 (soon)
50mm : Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar F2,8 // aus Jena Pancolar F1.8 // SMC Tak F1.4 // Planar F1.7
55mm : Auto-Rikenon F1.8
58mm : Helios 44-3 F2
85mm : Jupiter 9 F2
135mm : Pentacon auto 6-blade F2.8 // Super Tak F3.5 // CZJ Sonnar F3.5 Zebra |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
nice series, great contrast but too much sharpening _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
poilu wrote: |
nice series, great contrast but too much sharpening |
Thanks Poilu for your comment.
What do you think if you click on the image and see the new one ? I have discussed this with Attila several times. The posted image and that what will pop up are different and the posted one are often too sharp.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 416 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
The IQ of these Contax era Vario's continue to impress! I clicked to see the newer, less sharpened versions and and agree, they are better. Thanks for sharing the samples.
I know the subject of bokeh is so subjective, but to me, each Contax lens bokeh seems seems so much better than any of it's modern Sony/Zeiss counterparts. Kind of sad, but I prefer to convert all the old stuff than to buy any of the new lenses which would be so easy for me.
K. _________________ kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
thePiRaTE!! wrote: |
The IQ of these Contax era Vario's continue to impress! I clicked to see the newer, less sharpened versions and and agree, they are better. Thanks for sharing the samples.
I know the subject of bokeh is so subjective, but to me, each Contax lens bokeh seems seems so much better than any of it's modern Sony/Zeiss counterparts. Kind of sad, but I prefer to convert all the old stuff than to buy any of the new lenses which would be so easy for me.
K. |
Thank you for your comment.
You have right, in the meantime I´m thinking about to sell some of my new L-lenses because I never use it.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Really beautiful shots! I am surprised how far spring is in your area.
Speziell das Foto mit der krassen Wolkenformation ist umwerfend.
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
Contax is my love and these pictures have typical Zeiss rendering ...
Regarding that sharpening;
The thing is that when clicking on a picture it seems to be less sharp ..
I think the best thing how to show a picture is a link with [img] brackets ..
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Very nice images, Rolf, with a great set of lenses!
But I also think that they are oversharpened. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I don't see any difference in sharpening between the embedded and popup images, I only see a difference in image size, in that sometimes, but not always, the popup image is smaller. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Orio wrote: |
I don't see any difference in sharpening between the embedded and popup images, I only see a difference in image size, in that sometimes, but not always, the popup image is smaller. |
+1, no diff with popup images
I will travel 3 weeks with my HP laptop 1280x800 13" and every pics look beautiful _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Concerning the differences between embedded and popup images :
Try it for example with the last image ( that one with the castle on the top) and look at the small windows at this castle. On my screen (IMAC) there is a clear difference to see between the two images. The windows at the embedded looks indeed oversharpend, the popup not. _________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Rolf wrote: |
Concerning the differences between embedded and popup images :
Try it for example with the last image ( that one with the castle on the top) and look at the small windows at this castle. On my screen (IMAC) there is a clear difference to see between the two images. The windows at the embedded looks indeed oversharpend, the popup not. |
They look the same on my monitor. Maybe you have a better monitor which lets you see more differences. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 416 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Rolf wrote: |
Concerning the differences between embedded and popup images :
Try it for example with the last image ( that one with the castle on the top) and look at the small windows at this castle. On my screen (IMAC) there is a clear difference to see between the two images. The windows at the embedded looks indeed oversharpend, the popup not. |
They look the same on my monitor. Maybe you have a better monitor which lets you see more differences. |
For reference/curiosity, they are different on my monitor as well. Using HP2474w (24" S-IPS panel LCD).
K. _________________ kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|