| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
timo832000
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 544
Location: Germany / Cologne
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:41 pm Post subject: searching for a long telephoto lens 300 / 400mm |
 |
|
timo832000 wrote:
Currently I do the most of my animal shots with a Leica Elmarit 2.8/180 with Pentax mount conversion (leitax), it is a top lens but especially for wildlife or bird shots it's focal length is to short.
I think there are many ways to solve my problem:
1. I could buy a tele-converter e.g. a kenko 1.5 in pentax mount so I would turn my Elmarit 180 into a 4.8/270. But would the results be satisfying?
2. I could by a (not to big / heavy) 300mm lens. I got an offer for a SMC-Pentax-K 4/300. I think this lens can't reach my Elmarit but it's quality should be okay.
3. I could buy a Leica telyt 6.8/400. This lens is very old and not easy to use but all example pictures i saw from this one really looked good.
What would you do? Do you think the SMC Pentax - K 4/300 is a good performer? How about CA does it produce as much CA's as the Super Takumar does?
Thanks for your advice.
Timo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Leica 400!
I saw also.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainPenguin
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 86
Location: Stourbridge West Midlands
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CaptainPenguin wrote:
Recently got a Vivitar 300 f5.6 TX and its a belter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
timo832000
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 544
Location: Germany / Cologne
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
timo832000 wrote:
Does anyone know a good source for buying an old telyt-r 6.8/400?
Everything that appears on ebay Germany seems to be very expensive.
Greetings
Timo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
voytek
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 891
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
Tamron SP 2.8/300 is a very good lens, one from the best between 300mm
_________________
Cheers, Voytek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/top_lenses/long+tele/
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 842
Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
| timo832000 wrote: |
Does anyone know a good source for buying an old telyt-r 6.8/400?
|
Keh.com: http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/ProductList.aspx?Mode=searchproducts&item=10&ActivateTOC2=false&ID=&BC=LR&BCC=1&CC=6&CCC=2&BCL=&GBC=&GCC=&KW=
_________________
Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
voytek
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 891
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
Not a good time to go with Tamron to ZOO, so squirrel only, they are not enough polite to sit and wait.
I had to delete photos, they were pretty ugly, maybe conversion to B/W looks better
_________________
Cheers, Voytek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jibbonpoint
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 14
Location: Sydney Aust. not far from Jibbonpoint
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
jibbonpoint wrote:
These are some shots with a 400 Soligur 6.3. All shot at 11. They were taken very early in my ownership of the K10D & I hadn't gotten to the instructions on sensor cleaning. 
It was a very windy day but plenty of light. Tripod used, obviously.
The price I paid was about $US100 but I've seen them cheaper on e-bay.
I'll let others more knowledgable than me comment but I can take some more shots if anyone is interested further.
The second shot was at a considerable distance while the bouy was about 300 metres or so, from memory. It's a T-Mount.
_________________
Pentax K10D + Kit lens. Tamrons 70-210 19AH, 70-210 46A, 80-210 103A, Tokina SD 70-210,SP 2x tele: Pentax Super Takumar 50 1.4, 135 3.5, F 50 1.7. :Ricoh 35-70 Macro:Soligur 400 6.3: Tamron 500 55BB. Helios 44M-4 58mm 1:2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
I really think that the Leica is the better choice. It's usefull from the maximun aperture without any lost of contrast nor definition.
IT'S LEICA, please, no more words.
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jibbonpoint
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 14
Location: Sydney Aust. not far from Jibbonpoint
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jibbonpoint wrote:
Perhaps just a few more, estudlion.
This is a crop from my above post. Remember that this is a very considerable distance away.
I think that I might start using this a bit more.
_________________
Pentax K10D + Kit lens. Tamrons 70-210 19AH, 70-210 46A, 80-210 103A, Tokina SD 70-210,SP 2x tele: Pentax Super Takumar 50 1.4, 135 3.5, F 50 1.7. :Ricoh 35-70 Macro:Soligur 400 6.3: Tamron 500 55BB. Helios 44M-4 58mm 1:2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Hi Jibbonpoint,
Is this Soligor 400/6.3 the type with an 0<-.->C marking on the aperture ring ?
If not, could you post a picture of the lens ?
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jibbonpoint
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 14
Location: Sydney Aust. not far from Jibbonpoint
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jibbonpoint wrote:
It's a pre-set, luisalegria. I will certainly post a 'photo later in the morning. It's quite early here & I'm getting yelled at for making a noise. 
_________________
Pentax K10D + Kit lens. Tamrons 70-210 19AH, 70-210 46A, 80-210 103A, Tokina SD 70-210,SP 2x tele: Pentax Super Takumar 50 1.4, 135 3.5, F 50 1.7. :Ricoh 35-70 Macro:Soligur 400 6.3: Tamron 500 55BB. Helios 44M-4 58mm 1:2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| voytek wrote: |
Not a good time to go with Tamron to ZOO, so squirrel only, they are not enough polite to sit and wait.
I had to delete photos, they were pretty ugly, maybe conversion to B/W looks better
|
How lovely!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
| jibbonpoint wrote: |
Perhaps just a few more, estudlion.
This is a crop from my above post. Remember that this is a very considerable distance away.
I think that I might start using this a bit more.
|
Of course, all the words that you want, Jibbonpoint.
And you show us that your soligor is a very good lens, endeed.
But LEICA is, well, is LEICA. I think that perhaps is better than soligor.
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 1098
Location: Jakarta
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
| estudleon wrote: |
Of course, all the words that you want, Jibbonpoint.
And you show us that your soligor is a very good lens, endeed.
But LEICA is, well, is LEICA. I think that perhaps is better than soligor.
Rino. |
The Leica will not be much better than jibbonpoint's Soligor, both being achromatic doublets -- that is a lens that comprises only two elements grouped together. All the old Leica Telyt super-telephoto lenses, like the Novoflex Noflexar lenses, were achromatic doublets. Because doublets are not good at fast apertures, these lenses had quite limited maximum apertures. They were quite sharp, but only in the center of the field, the corners being soft. This is not a big drawback, because when using a telephoto the main subject is usually located in the center of the frame and the corners are out of focus. Furthermore, when used on a crop format camera, only the center of the 24x36 frame is imaged, and the soft corners get cropped.
From an usage point of view though, I would recommend the Novoflex follow focus lenses. Optically, they are just as good as the Leica Telyt lenses, but the Pigriff quick focus contraption is easier to operate and more reliable in my experience.
Cheers!
Abbazz
_________________
Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/
Last edited by Abbazz on Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:54 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
The Soligor may not be a simple doublet.
I have several of these cheap 400mm's of different makes, like Spiratone.
They are usually 4-element lenses, with two elements in front and two way in the back.
I have a simple doublet, a Piesker 400/5.5
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jibbonpoint
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 14
Location: Sydney Aust. not far from Jibbonpoint
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
jibbonpoint wrote:
Pictures of Soligor 400 - 6.3
If there's further interest, let me know how I can check if doublet/triplet.
_________________
Pentax K10D + Kit lens. Tamrons 70-210 19AH, 70-210 46A, 80-210 103A, Tokina SD 70-210,SP 2x tele: Pentax Super Takumar 50 1.4, 135 3.5, F 50 1.7. :Ricoh 35-70 Macro:Soligur 400 6.3: Tamron 500 55BB. Helios 44M-4 58mm 1:2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 1098
Location: Jakarta
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
| luisalegria wrote: |
The Soligor may not be a simple doublet.
I have several of these cheap 400mm's of different makes, like Spiratone.
They are usually 4-element lenses, with two elements in front and two way in the back.
I have a simple doublet, a Piesker 400/5.5 |
Thanks for putting it straight, Luis. I have this lens in its Spiratone incarnation. It's not bad for a 400mm and quite light as well. The very long minimum focus distance is the real bummer.
Cheers!
Abbazz
_________________
Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6602
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Hi Jibbonpoint,
Hot over there ain't it ?
Thats a Tokina - Tokyo Koki made lens, also sold by nearly everyone back in the 1960's. You will find them under dozens of brands, including big camera makers like Petri, Mamiya and Yashica as well as no-name store brands. This line was ubiquitous.
I don't have one (yet), but I have its little brothers, 300mm and smaller. I didn't know these were also sold under the Soligor brand, but I'm not too surprised.
The smaller ones are quite good, so its nice to know this one isn't a dud, for when I get one. I think its a 4-element job also.
Hi Abazz,
That minimum focus is my only problem with the 300mm of this line. I guess the 400mm also has something like 30ft/10m minimum.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jibbonpoint
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 14
Location: Sydney Aust. not far from Jibbonpoint
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
jibbonpoint wrote:
Your not wriong about the heat,luisalegria. I've never known so many days to exceed 40deg in a row. We're about to cop it again later in the week but today a balmy 27deg presently.
Anyway, the Lens depicted weighs in at just under 900gms & thanks for the information.
See ya
Graeme
_________________
Pentax K10D + Kit lens. Tamrons 70-210 19AH, 70-210 46A, 80-210 103A, Tokina SD 70-210,SP 2x tele: Pentax Super Takumar 50 1.4, 135 3.5, F 50 1.7. :Ricoh 35-70 Macro:Soligur 400 6.3: Tamron 500 55BB. Helios 44M-4 58mm 1:2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dickb
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 821
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dickb wrote:
| Abbazz wrote: |
All the old Leica Telyt super-telephoto lenses, like the Novoflex Noflexar lenses, were achromatic doublets.
Abbazz |
FYI, the Noflexar-T 400/5.6 is a triplet.
| Abbazz wrote: |
Because doublets are not good at fast apertures, these lenses had quite limited maximum apertures.
Abbazz |
The older version of the Leitz Telyt, used with the Televit focus system, is a 560mm f/5.6. Fairly fast for a 560mm I'd say. It doesn't have quite the optical reputation of the 560/6.8 though.
| Abbazz wrote: |
They were quite sharp, but only in the center of the field, the corners being soft. This is not a big drawback, because when using a telephoto the main subject is usually located in the center of the frame and the corners are out of focus. Furthermore, when used on a crop format camera, only the center of the 24x36 frame is imaged, and the soft corners get cropped.
Abbazz |
These lenses have a large image circle, some people even use them on 6*6 medium format systems. So even 24*36 gets rid of most of the softer corners.
| Abbazz wrote: |
From an usage point of view though, I would recommend the Novoflex follow focus lenses. Optically, they are just as good as the Leica Telyt lenses, but the Pigriff quick focus contraption is easier to operate and more reliable in my experience.
Cheers!
Abbazz |
I've never used the Leitz Telyt with a fixed R mount version, but I've got the Novoflex follow focus system and I've tested the Leitz Televit system. Both require some getting used to, but the Novoflex is far more user friendly in my view. And I've got both Leitz Telyt and Noflexar-T heads to go with this system, so I'm quite happy. I actually bought another set (Leitz 560/6.8 + Novoflex PiGriff) to get some more included accesories (PiStock, EF mount). Even for me, two 560/6.8s is a bit excessive, so I'll probably sell one again.
Cheers,
Dick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
timo832000
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
Posts: 544
Location: Germany / Cologne
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
timo832000 wrote:
Thanks for your advice. I personaly expect the Leica lenses to be better than the Soligor.
I will try to get a Leica Telyt-R 6.8/400 but i dislike the follow focus system so i have to find a telyt with usual manual focus.
Does anyone of you have a Telyt-R 6.8/400 for sale?
Greetings from Germany
Timo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I have a Novoflex 40cm f5.6 that is doublet lens, produce excellent results.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/novoflex/novoflex_40cm_f5_6/
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
| timo832000 wrote: |
Thanks for your advice. I personaly expect the Leica lenses to be better than the Soligor.
I will try to get a Leica Telyt-R 6.8/400 but i dislike the follow focus system so i have to find a telyt with usual manual focus.
Does anyone of you have a Telyt-R 6.8/400 for sale?
Greetings from Germany
Timo |
Hi Timo!!
In my humble opinion, your election is of the best ones.
Good luck
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
