View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Which Leica lens are we talking about? And which Leica mount? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1443 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
Olivier wrote: |
I just bought a Soligor 400mm f6.3 and it's not the same as those shown in this topic. So, i'm wondering which is it and wether you know it.
This is a m42 mount wich can be quickly unmounted by a lever O-L
Here it is :
Any comments are welcome. |
I have just acquired one of these lenses, too. I've been led to believe that it's made by Tokina, during the late-1960s to mid-1970s.
If I am wrong, I am sure I will be corrected in due time.
Mine is also a T4/TX mount with a M42 mount end, f/6.3-f/22, with tripod collar.
Looks identical to yours, Olivier, except that mine might be cosmetically less perfect.
Hopefully, Luis will be kind enough to identify these lenses for us. _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Yep, Soligor version of Tokina Automatic 400/6.3, in T4 mount. I have this lens. Bill (casualcollector) thought this lens was a bit uncommon, but it seems not !
Mine is sadly disappointing, its not as sharp as many cheap 300-400mm lenses of the period. There is no good reason why it should be, as this is a very simple lens. Perhaps there is some misalignment.
How are yours ? _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1443 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Yep, Soligor version of Tokina Automatic 400/6.3, in T4 mount. I have this lens. Bill (casualcollector) thought this lens was a bit uncommon, but it seems not !
Mine is sadly disappointing, its not as sharp as many cheap 300-400mm lenses of the period. There is no good reason why it should be, as this is a very simple lens. Perhaps there is some misalignment.
How are yours ? |
I have yet to get mine out for some shots, due to absolutely despicable weather, only very recently gone warmer.
I will attempt to bring it out this coming weekend, weather permitting.
Build quality is really excellent; I'm hoping it will perform optically as well.
My copy is near-mint in condition; nothing at all to be found on the inner optics
except the typical near-microscopic specks of dust.
Rear-outer element needs some cleaning, while the front-outer element
is just about as clean as it can get. I've done no cleaning yet on my copy,
though the spots on the rear element need to be taken care of.
Many thanks for the ID, Luis. _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5084 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
my_photography wrote: |
Wow, the photos of the bird by Soligor 400mm f6.3 is nice. The sunlight really make the difference. Is it very difficult to focus with the lens? |
Yep, sunlight makes the difference.
I find it's easy to focus with it.
I have a chipped adapter ring with AF control. But with my EOS 40D, i also have a good viewfinder with a large bright view, 95% coverage and 0.95x magnification. It helps and i use the AF control just to get in range and then adjust with what i see in the viewfinder.
The Soligor 400mm's focus ring is soft and you don't have to rotate it too much to make the focus. Just a regret, the minimum focus is about 6-7 meters. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5084 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:58 pm Post subject: some pics with soligor 400 |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Hello.
I'm back with some samples of the Soligor 400mm f:6.3
It's quite soft wide open and then quite sharp just opened at f8 !
I's fun to play with, even if you need a tripod.
Closed 1 stop at f8 :
The same pic cropped at 100% :
_________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Hi Olivier,
You are getting much better results than I am with this lens. You have a good copy. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5084 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Hi Olivier,
You are getting much better results than I am with this lens. You have a good copy. |
Sorry for yours, Luis.
It's even sharper than what we see on these resized jpeg pics, especially on the last one. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Music & Photography
Joined: 11 Dec 2008 Posts: 35 Location: Rhein-Main Area, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:57 pm Post subject: Novoflex 5,6/400 |
|
|
Music & Photography wrote:
...here are some teasers of my favourite Novoflex T-Noflexar 5,6/400....moon from a tripod rest freehand.....
Nikon D90 (M-mode) - Novoflex T-Noflexar 5,6/400 - ISO 400
Nikon D90 (M-mode) - Novoflex T-Noflexar 5,6/400 - ISO 200
_________________ Digital
Canon 400D/G3 - Nikon D90/D2x
Fujifilm F47fd
Analog
Canon Eos 500, Rollei 6x6,
Contax G1/G2, Kodak Retina Ia
Manual Lenses
Mamiya 1,4/55, Helios 2,0/58, Vivitar 2,8/90, Pentacon 2,8/100, Takumar 2,5/135, CZJ 2,8/200,
Novoflex 3,8/200, Meyer 4,0/300, Enna 4,5/400, T-Noflexar 5,6/400, Sigma 8,0/600 (mirror)
1,5er Extender Novoflex, Kenko, 1,4er Sigma |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wildlightphoto
Joined: 06 Sep 2008 Posts: 66 Location: Sacramento USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wildlightphoto wrote:
FWIW I've used the Leica 400mm f/5.6 with Televit, Leica 400mm f/6.8, Novoflex 400mm f/5.6, Novoflex 400mm f/5.6 T-Noflexar and numerous other long lenses (wildlife is my specialty).
Of these lenses my favorite for both optical quality and handling is the Leica f/6.8. It's sharp at full aperture, produces pleasing bokeh, shows very little flare, the color saturation is excellent, and it's lightweight and easy to use all day without fatigue.
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/400r68.html
My second choice would be the T-Noflexar. At f/8 it's about as sharp as the f/6.8 Telyt, bokeh is equally good, color saturation and flare are not quite up to the Leica lens' standard. It's also much heavier and bulkier, doesn't balance as well on a tripod or monopod, and hand-held, it's shoulder stock isn't as good as the Leica shoulder stock. One advantage it has if you get it with the PIGRIF-C mount or the PIGRIF-B with extension bellows is the excellent close focus limit.
The Leica lens for the Televit isn't as sharp, has weaker color saturation, more flare and the Televit is big and bulky. Its price today reflects collectors' interest more than users.
The non-T Novoflex would be my last choice of these four. Before Photoshop I never got good sharpness or color saturation from mine and it has the balance problems, weight, and bulk of the T-Noflexar.
The 400mm Soligor photos posted in this thread are soft. _________________ Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5084 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Beautiful pics Douglas.
If i understand well, the first one is shot with the Leica, isn't it ?
I agree with you about the soligor 400mm above. They look soft.
On my computer, they are sharper. So, i tried to improve the treatment for resizing by making it directly from DPP.
Here is one with such treatment :
Still some loss of sharpness when i compare to my original photo.
How do you proceed and with which tools ? _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
It seems a local contrast issue with the cat picture, mostly to do with the lighting. Thats a backlit subject in shadow. This can certainly be improved in PP.
That 100% crop seems like it gets to or close to the sensor performance, which is about as much as one can expect of a lens on a DSLR. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
wildlightphoto wrote: |
FWIW I've used the Leica 400mm f/5.6 with Televit, Leica 400mm f/6.8, Novoflex 400mm f/5.6, Novoflex 400mm f/5.6 T-Noflexar and numerous other long lenses (wildlife is my specialty).
Of these lenses my favorite for both optical quality and handling is the Leica f/6.8. It's sharp at full aperture, produces pleasing bokeh, shows very little flare, the color saturation is excellent, and it's lightweight and easy to use all day without fatigue.
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/400r68.html
My second choice would be the T-Noflexar. At f/8 it's about as sharp as the f/6.8 Telyt, bokeh is equally good, color saturation and flare are not quite up to the Leica lens' standard. It's also much heavier and bulkier, doesn't balance as well on a tripod or monopod, and hand-held, it's shoulder stock isn't as good as the Leica shoulder stock. One advantage it has if you get it with the PIGRIF-C mount or the PIGRIF-B with extension bellows is the excellent close focus limit.
The Leica lens for the Televit isn't as sharp, has weaker color saturation, more flare and the Televit is big and bulky. Its price today reflects collectors' interest more than users.
The non-T Novoflex would be my last choice of these four. Before Photoshop I never got good sharpness or color saturation from mine and it has the balance problems, weight, and bulk of the T-Noflexar.
The 400mm Soligor photos posted in this thread are soft. |
Of course, LEICA IS LEICA.
Only zeiss can be pair.
Canon, Soligor, Pentax, Tokina, Minolta, Konica, Meyer, all come behind.
It's a good thing to recognize that also exists, in some cases, a difference in the price ( justified )
But independently of all the questions outsider of the photographic thing, LEICA IS LEICA (THE BEST).
And your wanderfull pics says that. (And that you are a very good photographer too). _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wildlightphoto
Joined: 06 Sep 2008 Posts: 66 Location: Sacramento USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
wildlightphoto wrote:
Olivier wrote: |
Beautiful pics Douglas.
If i understand well, the first one is shot with the Leica, isn't it ?...
... How do you proceed and with which tools ? |
The picture of the Yellow-billed Magpie was made with the Novoflex T-Noflexar using the Leica DMR digital back.
I use the camera in RAW mode and convert to a 16-bit TIFF using Imacon FlexColor software, then convert to 8-bit and re-size for the web in Photoshop with a little bit of sharpening on the L channel. _________________ Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5084 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
wildlightphoto wrote: |
The picture of the Yellow-billed Magpie was made with the Novoflex T-Noflexar using the Leica DMR digital back.
I use the camera in RAW mode and convert to a 16-bit TIFF using Imacon FlexColor software, then convert to 8-bit and re-size for the web in Photoshop with a little bit of sharpening on the L channel. |
Wow !
Thanks a lot for this treatment e-learning.
Be sure that I shall give it a try.
Best regards.
Olivier _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Rusty wrote: |
Hi Timo
Ihave a more recent soligor 400 mm but i think the optical construction would be the same and who made it (Luis will know ? )
I find it very sharp and absolute value for money (they normally come cheap)
|
Old post back from the dead alert!!!
I just picked one of these up in beautiful condition (t-mount). I will now stop collecting the big Soligors as I have:
35/2.8
135/3.5
180/3.5
200/3.5
250/4.5
300/5.6
350/5.6
400/6.3
450/8
75-260/4.5
100-200/5.6
I also had a 200/4.5 pre-set but it was crap so I sold it on _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
can you post some photos taken with it?? If they don't already exist..a new thread maybe?? _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Will start a new thread once I have received the lens and taken some decent shots, and will link back.
This is the lens I have won:
_________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I have seen a few of these but would like to know how well they go before I commit... Thanks look forward to seeing them. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
Hi Attila, I'm new to this world of photography, I've just bought a used Nikon D5300, and I would like to know if you recomend buying this lens for bird photography:
https://usedphotopro.com/novoflex-noflexar-400mm-40cm-f56-lens-utf-08-n40056-4-48488-f21d5438
any ideas or suggestions wil be apreciated
Carlos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1319 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Hi carlos welcome.
The ad you link to is for just the optical part of the novoflex. To use it you also need the two handle stock. For more info see here (and ccheck out the links):
https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/novoflex-noflexar-modular-pigriff-system-240mm-300mm-400mm-600mm-64cm.html
The price isn't unreasonable, but if you bide your time I bet you'll find the whole thing for not a lot more. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
yes, the grip and the tubes are missing ; only the aperture and glass unit is included. BUT not only are the ad pictures carefully disguising the fact, but it is a plain Noflexar, not noflexarT which is reputed to be optially superior (not only for its flatter field on a 6x6).
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
correction: its identity is learly shown in the second side picture, not disguised.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|