View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:26 pm Post subject: Konica Hexanon AR 1.4/57 @ NEX-7 |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Most of the shots at f/2 or f/2.8, some at f/1.4 or f/5.6.
All images just shot in JPG, ISO 200. PP = basic levels adjustment, some reshapening after resizing and the frame, of course.
1
HexNex02 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
2
HexNex03 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
3
HexNex04 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
3 (100% crop, no sharpening!!)
digger_crop by LucisPictor, on Flickr
4
HexNex05 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
4 (100% crop, no sharpening!!)
digger_crop_mud by LucisPictor, on Flickr
5
HexNex06 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
5 (100% crop, no sharpening!!)
deco_crop by LucisPictor, on Flickr
6
HexNex07 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
7
HexNex08 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
7 (100% crop, no sharpening!!)
bike_crop by LucisPictor, on Flickr
8 (just cropped from #7!)
HexNex09 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
9
HexNex11 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
10
HexNex10 by LucisPictor, on Flickr
11 (100% crop, no sharpening!!)
drops_crop by LucisPictor, on Flickr
If you use an even better lens and stop it down a little, you don't need a close-up lens any more!
And boy, I am so happy to have a new and fast computer now. Those JPGs are about 5 MB not to mention the RAW-files! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Great to see that NEX-7 exercise outdoors!
How do you find the sharpness of the lens at f1.4. See my thread here, a cousin of your lens.
http://forum.mflenses.com/konica-hexanon-50mm-f1-4-goes-to-the-park-t45801.html
50/14 supposedly better than 57/14. But I don't see that so far. My OMZ 50/1.4 MC is way better at f1.4.
I did not shoot anything smaller as if I wanted good performance at anything smaller, I could choose any lens in my collection.
Last edited by stingOM on Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bob955i
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
I like #1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Yes, that's what they say. I cannot compare, since I do not own the 1.4/50. I also think that my Zuiko 1.4/50 might be a little sharper. The Hexanon 1.4/57 is probably on par with my Nikkor-S.C 1.4/50.
But when I buy such an "old" lens like the 1.4/57, I do not aim at perfect sharpness, rather at a special character.
This 1.4/57 shows considerable CA wide open but sharpnes is not really an issue (as you can see in the 100% crops). _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Yeah I know what you mean. Thanks Carsten! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Very impressive, Carsten. That Hexanon renders very well saturated colors and the NEX-7 does an excellent job of recording them. Neglecting the CA, of course, which can be removed in PP.
So, have you tried it out at high ISOs yet? I'm curious how it performs at high ISOs with such a high megapixel count. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dragom
Joined: 01 Nov 2008 Posts: 177 Location: Porto - Portugal
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dragom wrote:
Great! Decoration photo is fantastic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
So, have you tried it out at high ISOs yet? I'm curious how it performs at high ISOs with such a high megapixel count. |
http://forum.mflenses.com/yes-yes-7-times-yes-t45740.html#1194427
http://forum.mflenses.com/yes-yes-7-times-yes-t45740,start,15.html#1194472 _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Wow! That ISO 6400 shot has about the same level of noise that I get with my Canon XS (1000D) at ISO 400. My camera's high ISO performance is so poor, I rarely take it off its ISO 100 setting. Another reason why I'm feeling the NEX temptation. Honestly, the NEX-7 is pretty much exactly the camera I was hoping Sony would come out with -- except its APS-C instead of FF. Oh well, can't have everything, I guess. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
-- except its APS-C instead of FF. Oh well, can't have everything, I guess. |
Honestly, I am pretty happy that is it APS-C for two reasons:
1. Had it been developed as FF, I would not have been able to afford it.
2. With such a short register distance, a FF sensor would have caused serious trouble with corner performance! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16663 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Looks pretty good to me Carsten! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Thanks. Next will be some shots with a "better" lens. Perhaps the Summicron 2/50... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Damn good! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Here is one from tonight. Taken "free hand" with the Konica Hexanon 1.8/40 (Pancake), JPEG, ISO1600, 1/15sec:
... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de
Last edited by LucisPictor on Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
cooltouch wrote: |
-- except its APS-C instead of FF. Oh well, can't have everything, I guess. |
Honestly, I am pretty happy that is it APS-C for two reasons:
1. Had it been developed as FF, I would not have been able to afford it.
2. With such a short register distance, a FF sensor would have caused serious trouble with corner performance! |
Yeah, I can unfortunately agree with number 1, but I'm trying to understand number 2. The Nex allows one to place the lens at the registration distance it was designed to be used at. So why would there be a problem with corner performance, unless the lens already had a problem with it to begin with? _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
... but I'm trying to understand number 2. The Nex allows one to place the lens at the registration distance it was designed to be used at. So why would there be a problem with corner performance, unless the lens already had a problem with it to begin with? |
The bigger the sensor, the flatter the angle in which the light shines on the surface.
The flatter the angle, the more it deteriorates image quality.
If the register distance is rather long, this effect is not as visible as with a shorter one - and the NEX has a very shot register distance. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
That means, I think, that lenses like 35mm Jupiter for RF would not be succesfully applicable. But a 35mm or 28mm Rokkor can hardly be seen like that. Sensor - lens distance is not that short!
Nice pictures and lovely portrait anyhow. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. Hrm . . . all the more reason for me to continue shooting slides with my old 35mm cameras. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 2155 Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
I think it does a great job. Seems like a really nice camera. _________________ Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Minolfan wrote: |
That means, I think, that lenses like 35mm Jupiter for RF would not be succesfully applicable. But a 35mm or 28mm Rokkor can hardly be seen like that. Sensor - lens distance is not that short!
|
That's perfectly right!
Some NEX-7 users have reported about a colour cast in the corners when using wide angle RF lenses (below 24mm). I cannot tell if that is right, because I do not one of those. But on Jan 4 I'm going to meet a friend who owns (and brings) a Zeiss 2.8/21 ZM.
With SLR wide angle lenses such as the CZJ Flek 4/20 this colour cast does not exist. (OK, I still have to really test it and try to provoke it, but I have not seen it so far.) That'S becaue the adapter adjusts the register distance to that of the lens. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Lovely set Carsten.
Are we reaching the point with these digital cameras where the IQ is a diminishing issue and the character becomes all?
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
patrickh wrote: |
Lovely set Carsten.
Are we reaching the point with these digital cameras where the IQ is a diminishing issue and the character becomes all?
patrickh |
I think so, Patrick. Thers is not much difference in IQ if I shoot with my 40D, 5D, NEX-3, NEX-7 or even the Sigma DP1s.
Nowadays, it's rather the handling and "feel" of a camera that distinguishes cameras. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de
Last edited by LucisPictor on Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
patrickh wrote: |
Lovely set Carsten.
Are we reaching the point with these digital cameras where the IQ is a diminishing issue and the character becomes all?
patrickh |
I think so, Patrick. Thers is not much difference in IQ if I shoot with my 40D, 5D, NEX-3, NEX-7 or even the Sigma DP1s.
Nowadays, it's rather the handling and "feel" of a camera that distinguishes cameras. |
much agreed! I bought a NEX5N not looking for better IQ than that of my Pentax K-x but obviously because of the difference of shooting experience with the small and light body, the manual focus aids, LCD and EVF.. _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Excellent results, Carsten, love the smooth bokeh in these, the colors. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
I love the first one the best. Autumnal brown colours and you can almost feel the texture of the leaves |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|