| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 1130
Location: Slovakia
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:49 pm Post subject: Fresh pics... Fujica and some glasses |
 |
|
spleenone wrote:
Fujica ST801
Ilford XP2
Processed and scanned in lab... Was test of new body and lenses as well.
C&C welcome
Super-Tak 200/4 @f4 1/2000
Pentacon 29/2.8 @11 1/1000
SMC Tak 50/1.4 @4 1/2000
SMC Tak 50/1.4 @5.6 1/125
SMC Tak 50/1.4 @1.4 1/2000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Excellent results! My faves are 1 and 3, but all are great shots. I really
like Ilford XP2, need to try another roll. Here's a pic of my cat with
XP2, Exakta 500 camera:
2.8/50 Tessar with short extension tube, Epson 4490 scan which doesn't
compare to your lab's scans
I like this film better than Kodak's BW400CN.
Hope to see more of your work, congrats! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 1130
Location: Slovakia
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
thanks =)
and nice capture... I like to shot cats... but I wasn't suceed with film yet ...only with digital... and also I didnn't try Kodak ...or Fuji C-41 bw film...
I tried XP2 and liked it so much (read about good refs) so I use it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Posts: 4514
Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
nice shots all. i like the tonal range of the ilford; almost stark.
_________________
Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Yes, nice indeed.
I just think that in the first shot the contrast is a bit too low and in the second one a tad too high. 3 and 5 are fine.
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Seems like an excellent contrast for being a chromogenic film !
(i.e. a colour film without colours)
Did you adjust contrast in PP ?
My tentatives with chromogenic film (about 15 years ago) were always a letdown. Sleepy negatives, bland contrast.
Maybe they have changed the film formula in the meantime?
I love the last two images. Seem perfect to my taste. The benches make a perfect motif and I love contrasty portraits in B&W.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 2578
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Fantastic results ! I love the 1st shot.
Cheers
Tobias
_________________
Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6943
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Nice series. I quite like the high contrast of #2. Very crisp!
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 1130
Location: Slovakia
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
Thank you all. Appreciate it.
| Orio wrote: |
Did you adjust contrast in PP ?
Maybe they have changed the film formula in the meantime?
I love the last two images. Seem perfect to my taste. The benches make a perfect motif and I love contrasty portraits in B&W. |
No PP. Only! conv. to grayscale from XP2 sepia tone which sometimes look like greenish or blueish after scanning. I suppose that Takumar makes own part. Maybe exposition but I don't want to overrate self. Yes I love benches. Many times I catch up myself when I shoot them. Good static objects.
Portraiture: was an experiment. I made some other pics.
SMC-Tak 50/1.4 @f2.8
SMC-Tak 50/1.4 @f1.4 (favourite from roll) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 1130
Location: Slovakia
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
| LucisPictor wrote: |
Yes, nice indeed.
I just think that in the first shot the contrast is a bit too low and in the second one a tad too high. 3 and 5 are fine. |
...and about this... so I'm not expert but one third from roll looks uncontrasty because of some freese issues probably. Negative look bit darker than other part. I walk with camera many hours in not very cosy surroundings. Instance:
same Tak 50 @5.6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Really like the first two shots in the second batch. The last one is too low
in contrast, almost looks like flare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 1130
Location: Slovakia
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
| Katastrofo wrote: |
Really like the first two shots in the second batch. The last one is too low
in contrast, almost looks like flare. |
Thanks...
...yes, the last one was example of frozen film what I suspect. How I signify above first third of film looks like that. Unpleasant. Somebody have opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009
Posts: 930
Location: Taiwan
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
| Katastrofo wrote: |
Really like the first two shots in the second batch. The last one is too low
in contrast, almost looks like flare. |
Agree. Excluding this one, I love whoile SMC-Tak series. Excellent contrast and composition. Mike
_________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
