 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pancolart


Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1980 Location: Slovenija
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Helios-40-2 of the same quality materials if produced today would have price of at least 750 EUR. Minimum. _________________ P a n c o l a r t . P h o t o . G a l l e r y http://juredolzan.deviantart.com
---------------------------
Vintage lenses age like wine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calvin83


Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 1794 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pancolart wrote: | | Helios-40-2 of the same quality materials if produced today would have price of at least 750 EUR. Minimum. |
I think the production cost will be much expensive than the old date. Let's see if the final price is attractive to us.  _________________ Camera and Tripod: Sony NEX-5N+18-55 OSS, Benro C2691TB1+PS-N5B QR plate
M42:Biotar 2/58, Flektogon 2.4/35, Sigma XQ 4/300, MC Rubinar 4.5/300, Aragon 2.8/100, Vivitar 1.9/35, Wollensak 2.8/50, Quinar 3.5/100 and much more...
Exakta: Quinaron 2.8/35, Tele-Quinar 2.8/135
Enlargers: GreatWall 3.5/90(build in helicoid), Meopta 4.5/135, Ross 4/9cm, Elgeet 4.5/90, Meyer 4,5/105, Travegar 105mm F3.5 and some TTH enlargers
Others: Tokina AT-X 2.5/90 C/Y, Yashica ML 1.4/50, Jupiter 8 red p 2/50 LTM, Kilfitt 5.6/300 M39, Hexar 3.5/75, Xenon 1.9/50 DKL, Quinon 1.9/50 DKL, Heligon 1.9/50 DKL, Eurygon 4/35 DKL, Helios 33, Helios 44 m39, Sonnar T 1.5/50 and 2/85 RF, Xenotar 2.8/80 m39x.75
Waiting for CLA: Mitsuki 2.8/24, Oreston 1.8/50, CZJ 3.5/135, Meyer 4.5/35
Too many new lens to be mentioned.
My Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Laurentiu Cristofor

Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 444 Location: WA, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sirrith

Joined: 17 Sep 2010 Posts: 212 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pancolart wrote: | | Helios-40-2 of the same quality materials if produced today would have price of at least 750 EUR. Minimum. |
How do you know this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pancolart


Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1980 Location: Slovenija
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sirrith wrote: | | Pancolart wrote: | | Helios-40-2 of the same quality materials if produced today would have price of at least 750 EUR. Minimum. |
How do you know this? |
It's an estimate. Imagine Samyang with thicker, solid materials and whole different production process. _________________ P a n c o l a r t . P h o t o . G a l l e r y http://juredolzan.deviantart.com
---------------------------
Vintage lenses age like wine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rawhead


Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1499 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm. Weren't the Helios-40-2s going for like $100 back in the early 90s? I find it hard to believe that would now cost 750€ to manufacture. _________________ EOS 5D Mk II, Sony NEX-6, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pancolart


Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1980 Location: Slovenija
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rawhead wrote: | | Hmmm. Weren't the Helios-40-2s going for like $100 back in the early 90s? I find it hard to believe that would now cost 750€ to manufacture. |
Probably average monthly wage was also $100 at the time. Factory today wouldn't be a part of Soviet conglomerate, exchanging materials, sharing resources,
partly working for military purposes, getting it's revenue from state no matter the real production costs. _________________ P a n c o l a r t . P h o t o . G a l l e r y http://juredolzan.deviantart.com
---------------------------
Vintage lenses age like wine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Metalluga

Joined: 21 Feb 2012 Posts: 13 Location: Russian, Moskow
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pancolart wrote: | | rawhead wrote: | | Hmmm. Weren't the Helios-40-2s going for like $100 back in the early 90s? I find it hard to believe that would now cost 750€ to manufacture. |
Probably average monthly wage was also $100 at the time. Factory today wouldn't be a part of Soviet conglomerate, exchanging materials, sharing resources,
partly working for military purposes, getting it's revenue from state no matter the real production costs. |
The main specialization of the plant is the same: The military and space optics. Following the statement by President of Russia V.V. Putin, that it is necessary to develop a civil optics in Russia. The plant has received funds and financing items. Just because of this, there was the marketing department photos)
And, of course, the marketing department could not help but notice the popularity of Helios 40-2. because equipment stored in the hangar of the plant, it was not difficult to resume production )))
Because in Helios 40-2 not used Fluorite and UD Lenses, its cost is low. _________________ Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Lens:
Zenitar MC 16 mm f/ 2.8 Fish-Eye
Olympus OM-System Zuiko MC Auto-W 24 mm f/ 2.8
Canon EF 24-70 mm f/ 2.8 L USM
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.7 C/Y
Helios-44М-7 58 mm f/ 2.0 МС
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/ 2.8 L USM
Tokina AT-X MACRO 90 mm f/ 2.5
Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestor 135 mm f/ 2.8
Nikon Nikkor 300 mm f/ 4.5 ED IF Ai
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arctures

Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 213 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am going to get one copy of 40-2 as soon as I get some detailed info or tests. I am agree with Metalluga and I am sure they could provide excellent quality lenses for reasonable price. I am not going to visit Moscow in the next 2-3 weeks but I wish visiting that shop so much Hope to see some shots at least. Also I believe they really could make a new lens series based on different designes already developed in USSR.
BTW. They do have a basic international section on their website:
http://www.zenit-foto.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=426&Itemid=143
Banner says "Foreign trade" so I believe it is very likely they will ship abroad.
PPS. Looking on their services I fund the following section:
....
On demand optical elements production.
Herein OJSC KMZ a new technological equipment produced by «Optotech» (Germany) has been implemented. This equipment is for precision spherical, aspherical, cylindrical, planar type and prizmatic optical elements.
....
They are also surely could manufacture an apochromatic optics. So this is just wonderful. _________________ Canon 5DMKII, NEX-5n, Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Hexanon 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0,
Voigtländer APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Jupiter 21M 200/4, Helios-44-2 58/2.0,
Mir-24M 35/2.0, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5, Tamron 19AH 70-210/3.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iangreenhalgh1


Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 9315
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
New 16mm Zenitar 16mms are 199USD here:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/FishEye-MC-Zenitar-f-2-8-16mm-Minolta-AF-Sony-Alpha-New-/150556751240?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item230de1b588#ht_4650wt_1163 _________________ 'The question I would really consider (especially if an amateur and on a budget) is whether or not anyone (including yourself, of course) can tell the difference in any situation for which you will use the lens...and if they can, why are they burying their noses in your prints hard enough to tell the difference instead of responding to the prints emotionally and thinking about what they might mean?' - 2F/2F on apug.org
Digital: Sony NEX-3, Samsung NX100, Canon EOS 450d
35mm SLR: Konica FT-1, Konica FC-1, Konica Autoreflex T, Carena SRH760, Exakta RTL1000, Canon EOS 10qd
35mm VF: Olympus Stylus, Konica C35, Konica A4, Konica MG, Konica MT-9, Ricoh FF-9, Ricoh AF-80
35mm RF: Zorki 6, Kiev II, Kiev IV, Contax IIIa, CZJ Werra III,
Medium format: Franka Rolfix, Mess Ikonta 524/16, Voigtlander Bessa with Skopar 3.5/105, Voigtlander Bessa with Voigtar 3.5/105, Kiev 6C, Century Graphic 23, Ensign Selfix 820, Kershaw 450
MF lenses: Schneider Angulon 6.5/68, Componon-S 5.6/100, C-Claron 4.5/135, Xenar 3.5/105, Mamiya C 2.8/45, Mamiya 2.8/80, CZJ Flektogon 4/50, Biometar 2.8/80, Zodiac 3.5/30, Tominon 4.5/135, Pullin Pulnar 2.8/100
Large Format: Ernemann HEAG Series VII version II 9x12 with Kodak Anastigmat 6.3/170
Konica Hexanons 4/21, 2.8/24, 3.5/28, 2.8/35, 1.8/40, 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 1.8/50, 3.2/135, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 4.5/300, 3.5-4.5/35-70, 4-4.6/28-135, 3.5/35-70, UC 3.5/45-100, 4/70-150, 4/65-135, UC 4/80-200. Hexars 3.5/28, 3.5/135, Konishiroku 2.8/35
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.8/35, Skoparex 3.4/35, Tessar 2.8/50, Sonnar 1.5/50, Biotar 2/58, Pancolar 1.8/50, Cardinar 4/100, Zeiss-Opton Biogon 2.8/35
Meyer/Pentacons 2.8/28, Primagon 4.5/35, Trioplan 2.9/50, 1.8/50, 2.4/50, Primotar 3.5/50, Primotar 3.5/135
Topcon RE Auto Topcors 1.8/58, 3.5/135, 5.6/200
Russians: OKC1-18-1 2.8/18, OKC1-28-1 2.8/28, Jupiter-12 2.8/35, Jupiter-8 2/50, Industar-50 3.5/50, Industar-26M 2.8/50, Industar-22 3.5/50, Zenitar M2S 2/50, Helios-44-2, Jupiter-9 2/85, Jupiter-11 4/135, Tair-3C 4.5/300
Tokina 3.5/17, Nikon Auto Nikkor-N 2.8/24, Nikon Micro-Nikkor-P 3.5/55, Ross Xpress 3.5/4in, Ross Xpress 4/5in, Ross Xpress 4.5/8.5in, Wollensak APO-Raptar 10/541
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Metalluga

Joined: 21 Feb 2012 Posts: 13 Location: Russian, Moskow
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is not Minolta AF, This is M42 mount with adapter Minolta.
МС Зенитар (Zenitar) - M 2.8/16 - M42 mount
МС Зенитар (Zenitar) - K 2.8/16 - Pentax K mount
МС Зенитар (Zenitar) - H 2.8/16 - Nikon F mount
МС Зенитар (Zenitar) - C 2.8/16 - Canon EF mount
Very good price. In the shop of the plant Price 170$ but not free shipped.
PS: The new Zenitar 2.8/16 packaging design (from September 2012):
 _________________ Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Lens:
Zenitar MC 16 mm f/ 2.8 Fish-Eye
Olympus OM-System Zuiko MC Auto-W 24 mm f/ 2.8
Canon EF 24-70 mm f/ 2.8 L USM
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.7 C/Y
Helios-44М-7 58 mm f/ 2.0 МС
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/ 2.8 L USM
Tokina AT-X MACRO 90 mm f/ 2.5
Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestor 135 mm f/ 2.8
Nikon Nikkor 300 mm f/ 4.5 ED IF Ai
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ForenSeil


Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 1954 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pancolart wrote: | | Sirrith wrote: | | Pancolart wrote: | | Helios-40-2 of the same quality materials if produced today would have price of at least 750 EUR. Minimum. |
How do you know this? |
It's an estimate. Imagine Samyang with thicker, solid materials and whole different production process. |
I think the biggest price factor of production is the optical glas and the hours of work.
Samyang is using high-end glas, while the Russian production still uses the good old formulars.
Hope there will be a lot shops selling these lenses without much extra charge soon _________________ Cameras in active use: IR/UV modified NEX-5N+EVF, NEX-C3, Pentax Q, Minolta XG9, Moskva 5 6x6 Rangefinder
Lenses in active use:
MF
Samyang 8/2.8 E-Mount, Docter-Optics Olympus 100x 1.25 finite macro lens, Tevidon 16/1.8, Tominon 17/4 (10x Macro), CZJ Tevidon 25/1.4, Novoflex Macro-Noflexar 35/3.5, Minolta MD 50/1.4, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Samyang 85/1.4, Rodagon 105/5.6, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Novoflex 400/5.6, Celestron 500mm F3.6, Novoflex 600/8
AF:
Sigma 19mm F2.8 E-Mount, Sony SEL50F18
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RnR
Joined: 11 Jul 2012 Posts: 22 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hope I didn't break any etiquette by reposting some of the material
Can anyone tell me why they are focusing on SLR mounts, and not mounts more suitable for the mirrorless revolution? I would have thought churning out old skool Russian lenses for M39 would be a winner given the popularity of Nex and M43 systems. _________________ Cheers, Hasse |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fermy


Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1505
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think their lens selection is very smart.
First they are doing the lenses that KMZ already manufactured in the past, so that they have all the documentation and know how. Secondly, it would be stupid to focus on lenses that are cheaply available on second hand market in large quantities. For example, they wouldn't be able to offer Jupiter-8 at the price that I would be interested to buy it. Jupiter-12 that can be used on mirrorless would be interesting, but that requires modifications to the existing design.
That limits their choices to Teles and UWA and here their best designs are SLR lenses, with possible exception of Jupiter-9. Not to mention that SLR lenses can be used both on mirrorless and DSLRs, while RF lenses are only for mirrorless. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Metalluga

Joined: 21 Feb 2012 Posts: 13 Location: Russian, Moskow
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ForenSeil wrote: | | Pancolart wrote: | | Sirrith wrote: | | Pancolart wrote: | | Helios-40-2 of the same quality materials if produced today would have price of at least 750 EUR. Minimum. |
How do you know this? |
It's an estimate. Imagine Samyang with thicker, solid materials and whole different production process. |
I think the biggest price factor of production is the optical glas and the hours of work.
Samyang is using high-end glas, while the Russian production still uses the good old formulars.
Hope there will be a lot shops selling these lenses without much extra charge soon |
In Russia traditionally high margins. Sometimes prices in different stores may differ by 2-2.5 times ... _________________ Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Lens:
Zenitar MC 16 mm f/ 2.8 Fish-Eye
Olympus OM-System Zuiko MC Auto-W 24 mm f/ 2.8
Canon EF 24-70 mm f/ 2.8 L USM
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50 mm f/ 1.7 C/Y
Helios-44М-7 58 mm f/ 2.0 МС
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/ 2.8 L USM
Tokina AT-X MACRO 90 mm f/ 2.5
Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestor 135 mm f/ 2.8
Nikon Nikkor 300 mm f/ 4.5 ED IF Ai
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|