MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
DiskFreeVault safely moves Mac apps and data to external storage.
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

Halina 35x - worst design flaw in a 35mm camera ever?
Post new topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:08 pm
Post subject: Halina 35x - worst design flaw in a 35mm camera ever?
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:08 pm
Post subject: Halina 35x - worst design flaw in a 35mm camera ever?
Reply


Just finished shooting a test roll in this camera. Then the camera really finished the roll.

Apparently the advance sprockets won't disengage for rewinding if there is any tension on the film. Like say the tension you get when you reach the end of a roll. Or the tension you get when you try to rewind a roll.

Predictable results ensued.

Next time I guess I'll just rewind when the counter reaches 0 regardless of whether there is another exposure or two on the roll.


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:31 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:31 pm
Post subject:
Reply
A terminal quirk indeed. My medalist 1 is still locked up from just trying to load a roll of film. Engineering at it's worst. LOL


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:24 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:24 pm
Post subject:
Reply
I did start to shoot one roll with this camera and I did give up Wink perhaps just throw out camera with film all together, one of my worst experience.


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:28 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:28 pm
Post subject:
Reply
On the other hand, it looks very nice in my cupboard! Laughing


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:30 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:30 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Attila wrote:
I did start to shoot one roll with this camera and I did give up Wink perhaps just throw out camera with film all together, one of my worst experience.


I already took the time to take apart and clean the lens - so I've got to get at least one roll out of it. Laughing

Kind of funny, the center element of the lens is uncoated... cheapskates.


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:17 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:17 pm
Post subject:
Reply
I think that referring to it as a "design flaw" gives far too much credit to Halina, and assumes they even spent any time at all at the design stage Laughing

Please, just put it on a shelf and look at it from time to time, and use valuable film in something much, much better. Like a Kodak Instamatic Laughing


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:55 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:55 pm
Post subject:
Reply
The whole "Halina" name is a design flaw in itself, much like the "Miranda" brand. It's wrong to give cameras girl names. As a result, both do not exist anymore Laughing

Think about it, would Canon still exist if they called their cameras "Priscilla"?


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:00 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:00 pm
Post subject:
Reply
But at least Miranda was nice. Wink

Actually I've seen some pretty good pix come out of these 35x cameras: http://www.flickr.com/photos/loose_grip_99/4557756937/in/photostream/

Although most of these cameras seem to have aged pretty poorly.

Last edited by Mos6502 on Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:24 pm; edited 1 time in total


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:18 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:18 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Spotmatic wrote:
On the other hand, it looks very nice in my cupboard! Laughing


Proper usage Smile perhaps this will be next camera of my bird, as replacement of her Minolta SLR.


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:33 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:33 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Interesting thread on APUG "Most disappointing cameras?"......Don't think anyone has mentioned Halina35x yet Laughing


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:52 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:52 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Excalibur wrote:
Interesting thread on APUG "Most disappointing cameras?"......Don't think anyone has mentioned Halina35x yet Laughing


Nobody was same silly than me to try it out Laughing Laughing


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:03 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:03 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Attila wrote:
Excalibur wrote:
Interesting thread on APUG "Most disappointing cameras?"......Don't think anyone has mentioned Halina35x yet Laughing


Nobody was same silly than me to try it out Laughing Laughing


Laughing


Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:04 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:04 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Mos6502 wrote:
Actually I've seen some pretty good pix come out of these 35x cameras: http://www.flickr.com/photos/loose_grip_99/4557756937/in/photostream/


But the maker of the picture tells it costed him two years to learn using it properly! Laughing Laughing


Post
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:05 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:05 am
Post subject:
Reply
I've been a vintage camera hunter for many years and there are certain cameras that are just guaranteed to be nonfunctional when found.
Examples: any Bolsey or most any Kowa 35mm

On the other hand: Argus cameras almost always work even with rusty shutter blades. Go figure.


Post
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:18 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:18 pm
Post subject:
Reply
The problem with the Bolsey is usually the Alphax shutter... which unfortunately was used on lots and lots of old American cameras. Usually a pretty simple fix with a flush of naptha, but I do have one that's stuck tight. I try to avoid cameras with this shutter now.

The argus C3 shutter fires anyway because of the ridiculous spring tension it uses haha, I don't think anything can kill it short of getting dropped in mud.


Post
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:58 am
Post subject: Re: Halina 35x - worst design flaw in a 35mm camera ever?
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:58 am
Post subject: Re: Halina 35x - worst design flaw in a 35mm camera ever?
Reply
Mos6502 wrote:

Apparently the advance sprockets won't disengage for rewinding if there is any tension on the film.


Are you sure?

I had a problem with my Kiev rewind: the sprocket did disengage but the taking spool didn't? What was the problem? Asked R. Pinchback and he said it shouldn't even do that, but there is a spring that lets the taking spool slide. The spring system was just stuck and started working with a little bit of force (not the skywalker style ..)


Post
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:04 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:04 pm
Post subject:
Reply
I'm pretty sure. Whether it was like that originally or not I do not know. But I checked to make sure the rewind worked as soon as I got the camera - by pressing the rewind button and spinning the sprockets backwards. Seemed free enough to me at the time.

Then with film, the rewind button wouldn't budge at all.

After I pulled the film out, I tried again. Pushing on the sprockets even gently made it near impossible to push the rewind button in.

In any event I did manage to get the second roll rewound.


Post
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:49 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:49 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Probably wear and tear - but hardly a design flaw if the majority of 35Xs worked perfectly well. I don't recall any rewinding problems at all.


Post
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:39 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:39 pm
Post subject:
Reply


Post
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 11:36 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 11:36 pm
Post subject:
Reply
I had one in the 70's. The film has to be wound a full frame and the shutter cocked before you could rewind the film. My Agimatic has the same problem.


Post
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 12:44 am
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2015 12:44 am
Post subject:
Reply
Laughing so you know it well, cool!


Post
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:19 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Post
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:19 pm
Post subject:
Reply
Attila wrote:
Laughing so you know it well, cool!


I had some good photos from it. It was a nice little camera, pocketable but heavy!
Post new topic Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1