| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:05 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
D1N0 wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| Oldhand wrote: |
| calvin83 wrote: |
| The Komura 135mm 1:3.5 is a 5 element lens.. |
Yes, I think that one is five elements too.
There is also a three element version. I have it in LTM
Tom |
I don't know the LTM version but the SLR version should have 5 elements. I think they put the wrong chart here.
 |
That's it I want my Money back Komura!
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
| calvin83 wrote: |
| Oldhand wrote: |
| calvin83 wrote: |
| The Komura 135mm 1:3.5 is a 5 element lens.. |
Yes, I think that one is five elements too.
There is also a three element version. I have it in LTM
Tom |
I don't know the LTM version but the SLR version should have 5 elements. I think they put the wrong chart here.
|
That's it I want my Money back Komura! |
Here is the LTM version that I have.
I am sure it is a three element lens - and very good I might add.
Interestingly, it is a fully manual - ie not a pre-set lens.
What looks like two rings for set and rotate aperture at the front, are - in fact - one ring only.
The aperture diaphragm has 16 blades.
Tom
#1
#2
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2022 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
My 135/3.5 performs just about the same as the 2.8 version, so I guess a similar lens design. It is a bit sharper wide open i'd guess and a bit more contrasty (but my 2.8 is pretty dirty in side and has fungus)
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2022 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Super-Komura 200mm 1:3.5
 Super-Komura 200mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Super-Komura 200mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Super Sankor movie projection lens 2.5 inch 1:1.9
 Super Sankor 2.5 inch 1:1.9 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Super Sankor 2.5 inch 1:1.9 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Super Sankor 2.5 inch 1:1.9 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Came in at over a KG. But that was mainly the sleeve. The silver part is just the hood. Black part is the lens, also with inherent hood. So the lens itself is pretty small and light.
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phalbert
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 381
Location: Namibia
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2022 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phalbert wrote:
[quote="D1N0"]Super-Komura 200mm 1:3.5
Super-Komura 200mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Super-Komura 200mm 1:3.5 by The lens profile, on Flickr
I like the 200 f3, 5 a lot. But what mount is that?
_________________
🙋 My wishlist: Titan or Idaho 135/1,8 Nikon Df Nikkor 105/1,8 35/1,4 85/1,4
My dream lenses: Zuiko 180/2 Prototype Zuiko 85/1,4
Zeiss CY: 55/1,2 85/1,2
Astro Berlin 250/2 Canon EF 50/1,0 85/1,2
Nikkor 105/1,4 28/1,4
My stolen stuff: Zuiko 24/2 #106874; Zuiko 35-80/2,8 #102180; Zuiko 35/2 #119168; Zuiko 90/2 macro #102858; Zuiko x1,4 converter #102019; Tamron 17/3,5 #400567; Tamron 400/4 #80407; Soligor 135/2 #17506600 Sigma 28/1,8 #1001124 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| Phalbert wrote: |
I like the 200 f3, 5 a lot. But what mount is that? |
It came without a mount. I will put the uni-adapter to m42 on it. An adaptall-like mount adapter for super-komura lenses (the non super ones have a screw adapter like T-mount).
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 660
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2022 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| Oldhand wrote: |
| calvin83 wrote: |
| The Komura 135mm 1:3.5 is a 5 element lens.. |
Tom |
I think they put the wrong chart here.
|
The early SLR and Rangefinder 135/3.5 lens seems to be a sonnar type. Of the copies I have, the two rangefinder versions are able to swap the forward optical block between them, but not with the SLR copies. I think optically they are the same or very similar. Komura seemed to mix it up alot with the external appearance of the early lenses.
#1
#2
#3
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 660
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2022 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
#1
#2
#3
I just received the left hand lens, a Peerotar 135/3.5 identified as a Fujita lens by the 'FT' serial perfix, and got out a couple of other lenses to compare. The middle lens is a Miranda badged lens said to also be a Fujita made lens. The right hand lens is another said to be made by Fujita, although it is clearly different to the other two, just in terms of front and rear lens diameters. The center and left hand lens seem fairly similar, but the Miranda lens has amber coating, while the Peerotar is blue. The also have different aperture blades, the ones on the Peerotar are almost totally straight.
I've been trying to find out who made the right hand lens, the consensus seems to be Fujita, and I thought another possibility to be Komura, but the lens doesn't seem to be similar to anything else I've seen from either maker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 5043
Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2022 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
| Oldhand wrote: |
Here is the LTM version that I have.
I am sure it is a three element lens - and very good I might add.
Interestingly, it is a fully manual - ie not a pre-set lens.
What looks like two rings for set and rotate aperture at the front, are - in fact - one ring only.
|
of course it is 
why would you manufacture a preset LTM?
_________________
MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| kansalliskala wrote: |
| Oldhand wrote: |
Here is the LTM version that I have.
I am sure it is a three element lens - and very good I might add.
Interestingly, it is a fully manual - ie not a pre-set lens.
What looks like two rings for set and rotate aperture at the front, are - in fact - one ring only.
|
of course it is
why would you manufacture a preset LTM? |
Haha - yes of course, it is just that it resembles a two ring aperture control.
I worded my description poorly
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018
Posts: 660
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2022 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
#1
#2
I received this Soligor Elitar 135mm F/4.5 lens originally for Argus C2&3 cameras recently and finally got around to cleaning and testing it. It's a 4 element design, with a front doublet, then 2 single elements right at the back of the lens. Part of the rangefinder coupling is missing so it unfortunately can not be used on a C3 without more work.
It has the most background swirl of any 135mm lens I've tested. These are at full aperture, at the 'normal' 10 foot M.F.D of the lens. It's still noticeable swirly at F/5.6, and even F/8.
#3
#4
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11026
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
@Alun Thomas Okay I'm dizzy! 
My latest lens:
Took a risk and bought sight unseen (no photos) from KEH web site an "UGLY" rated Tamron SP 1:3.5 17mm 51B with Adaptall-2 NI mount & caps, for a price about half the ebay rate.
Surprise! It's actually a 151B in excellent optical and physical condition, except minor wear on the aperture ring, and some of the stenciled lettering has rubbed off -- the model number, the filter diameter, a tiny bit of the P in SP and some of the silver painted lettering on the caps.
I might have been a little happier winning last week's auction for a pristine copy including the hood, but would have paid over twice the amount!
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4033
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2022 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Canon FL 3.5/28mm and FL 3.5/200mm - from a guy working at a charity shop. The lenses were to be thrown away, and the guy saved them for me. The 28mm looks very nice but is dirty, the 200mm is fogged and needs cleaning.
Yashica ML 2.8/55mm Macro - not arrived yet! I'll have to pick it up in Southern Switzerland. Of course I'm curious to see whether it is really better (=sharper) than my Minolta AF 2.8/50mm ...
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3208
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
Canon FL 3.5/28mm and FL 3.5/200mm - from a guy working at a charity shop. The lenses were to be thrown away, and the guy saved them for me. The 28mm looks very nice but is dirty, the 200mm is fogged and needs cleaning.
Yashica ML 2.8/55mm Macro - not arrived yet! I'll have to pick it up in Southern Switzerland. Of course I'm curious to see whether it is really better (=sharper) than my Minolta AF 2.8/50mm ...
S |
Congratulations. The Yashica is excellent IMO.
_________________
For Sale:
Minolta MD 24mm f/2.8
Steinheil Auto D Tele Quinar 135mm f/2.8 (Exa)
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
Steinheil Cassarit 50mm f/2.8 M39 (Paxette)
I'm always interested in trading lenses! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
Canon FL 3.5/28mm and FL 3.5/200mm - from a guy working at a charity shop. The lenses were to be thrown away, and the guy saved them for me. The 28mm looks very nice but is dirty, the 200mm is fogged and needs cleaning.
Yashica ML 2.8/55mm Macro - not arrived yet! I'll have to pick it up in Southern Switzerland. Of course I'm curious to see whether it is really better (=sharper) than my Minolta AF 2.8/50mm ...
S |
Both of the Canons are very good.
Here are some images with the 3.5/28
#1
#2
#3
#4
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bluedxca93
Joined: 19 May 2021
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bluedxca93 wrote:
Yashinon ml 28mm
I hope its as good as i can read in the internet.
Number is like that A1239XXX.
Hope it arrives next week. It has the quadratic patterned plasting ring and appears to be black. Seems to be the second version with the first lens design if im not mistaken.- Not arrived yet.
Hope its sharper than my vivitar 35mm in the edges.
_________________
Canon eos 2000d
Yashinon DX .135 f2.8
Yashica Yashinon DX 50 f1.7
Yashica Yashinon ML 28 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2022 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Evening delivery Mamiya-Sekor C 300mm 1:5.6
 Mamiya-Sekor C 300mm 1:5.6 by The lens profile, on Flickr
 Mamiya-Sekor C 300mm 1:5.6 by The lens profile, on Flickr
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4033
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
Evening delivery Mamiya-Sekor C 300mm 1:5.6
|
That's the cheapest 300mm APO lens I'm aware of ... not fast, but very very good 
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
| D1N0 wrote: |
Evening delivery Mamiya-Sekor C 300mm 1:5.6
|
That's the cheapest 300mm APO lens I'm aware of ... not fast, but very very good |
Especially when it was only 1800 Yen (€12,50) Even after shipping and buying an adapter I can use for other lenses as well It's cheap. A 150/4 and 210/4 are also incoming. That's the lowest hanging Mamiya-Sekor Fruits covered.
Including shipping and tax €35,69
Adapter €43,66 (Ali free shipping)
Total €79,35.
This is still pretty well balanced on my K-1. A 300/4 wouldn't be.
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11026
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Super Takumar 1:4 / 150 -- early model I with early 5/5 optics (smaller rear element): https://takumarguide.weebly.com/1--4--150-374-43740.html
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 1:4 / 100 -- for parts, half price with "focus problem" only closer than 8ft okay. Front element group was cock-eyed on seat; simple to fix. Works fine now.
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7572
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
My 2nd copy of this lens. I sold the first one many years ago.
_________________
The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2536
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
Super Takumar 1:4 / 150 -- early model I with early 5/5 optics (smaller rear element): https://takumarguide.weebly.com/1--4--150-374-43740.html
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 1:4 / 100 -- for parts, half price with "focus problem" only closer than 8ft okay. Front element group was cock-eyed on seat; simple to fix. Works fine now. |
I'm tempted to get one as well to compare it to the second improved version... Will it ever end.
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11026
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2022 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
| visualopsins wrote: |
Super Takumar 1:4 / 150 -- early model I with early 5/5 optics (smaller rear element): https://takumarguide.weebly.com/1--4--150-374-43740.html
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 1:4 / 100 -- for parts, half price with "focus problem" only closer than 8ft okay. Front element group was cock-eyed on seat; simple to fix. Works fine now. |
I'm tempted to get one as well to compare it to the second improved version... Will it ever end. |
Personally, yes -- probably without 1:3.5/15
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 882
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
Canon FL 3.5/28mm and FL 3.5/200mm - from a guy working at a charity shop. The lenses were to be thrown away, and the guy saved them for me. The 28mm looks very nice but is dirty, the 200mm is fogged and needs cleaning.
Yashica ML 2.8/55mm Macro - not arrived yet! I'll have to pick it up in Southern Switzerland. Of course I'm curious to see whether it is really better (=sharper) than my Minolta AF 2.8/50mm ...
S |
Congratulations.
I did not like the 35 2,5 on full frame and would be interested in your findings regarding the 28. The 35 has corners that never get really sharp.
I do not own the 200 3,5, that is a beast, but I do enjoy the 200 4,5 that is really good. The reputation of the 3,5 is very nice so you should have high hopes. Keep us posted.
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
leto
Joined: 03 Apr 2021
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2022 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
leto wrote:
Just arrived yesterday. If somebody know anything more about the lens, i would be grateful to hear.
_________________
pentax: 15,50, 500, 1000mm
takumar: 135mm, 200mm, 300mm, 400mm, 600mm f4
xenar: 135mm f4, 200mm f4,8
kilfitt: 600mm f5.6
voigtlander: zoomar 36-82 f2.8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
