View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:00 am Post subject: [C&C] Saxophone Quartet - various SMCs |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
I did a 2 hours photo-session with some musician colleagues last weekend.
They asked for B&W photographs for their CD booklet and web-comercials.
It was a lot of fun to do, I learned a lot. Really difficult to control light with 4 persons.
Equipment:
K20D & many MF and AF lenses
2 x 540 FGZ wireless
Cristics very welcome, because I did this for the first time ...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Tobias, I am sure the quartet is happy with these! What is the group
called? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
timo832000
Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Posts: 544 Location: Germany / Cologne
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
timo832000 wrote:
Very good Tobias!
Isn`t it the Grand Hotel Zell Am See you used for the background?
Timo _________________ I love Leica ! But I need Pentax |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Lighting seems good to me in general.
I am doubtful about the "sepia" tinging, but I'll comment one by one as this is probably the kind of feedback that can be useful for you:
#1
is very good, one of the best. I only don't like that the wood strip at the bottom interrupts.
With an afterthought, it would have probably been better to photograph them individually, or two at a time, then compose the takes in photoshop so that the background looks uniform.
#2
Pose is excellent, one of the best, I love that all four of them look at the camera, the angle is perfect, but I don't like this sepia treatment. I would keep it B&W and increase the contrast.
#3
I don't like that the foreground guy looks away from the camera. He's the nearest to the camera (and the one in best focus) so he really should look into it - by looking away, it detracts energy of communication.
I am doubtful about the vignetting also.
#4
Location is lovely, but again the woman in the foreground should look into the camera. Also, while the three guys look very comfortable, she feels a bit rigid in the pose.
#5
again I see a problem with the gazes, they are a group, so they should all look into the same direction, to communicate unity. Instead each of them look in a different direction, this creates the feeling that the group lacks unity
#6
excellent pose, but again the same problem, while the three members from the left look in the camera, the rightmost guy looks away, this does not feel right to me
#7
here I think that the background is too busy, you should gaussian-blur it until the four people become the more obvious subject
#8
again great pose, love the stairway idea, but again the topmost guy's gaze goes in a direction that makes it feel separated from the others. Also, he should have been better in frontal pose, he looks a bit distorted
#9
another great pose and location, again the three characters at left are perfect, but again the guy at the top looks away and feels extraniated from the group - a feeling which is also enhanced by the separated position.
#10
excellent
I would not use dark vignette on top right corner - it makes a heavy feeling - try blurring a bit instead if you are disturbed by busy branches
#11
excellent
I would push contrast and give up sepia
#12
great pose again, but - guess what?- I don't like that the same guy still looks away from the camera
#13
beatles-style
again, I have a problem with rightmost guy looking away
In my opinion: they are a group - they should look in the same direction
this is a strong symbolism
if you like the "away gaze", then all of them should look away from the camera
if three of them look into the camera, then the fourth one should do also
#14
It would have been better if the woman's legs were behind the wall -OR- you should cut the photo higher, until the empty of her trousers disappears. Cut as it is now, the legs gain too much prominence in my opinion - which could have been good but only if she wore a skirt...
#15
the face expressions are not the best they can give here, in my opinion.
If I had to make a choice, here what I would choose (including the changes that I might suggest in the comment):
1 - 2 - 10 - 11
hope this helps
Orio _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goombles
Joined: 08 Apr 2010 Posts: 136 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
goombles wrote:
I agree with Orio's comments. The biggest gripe for me is that one/two people may not be looking into the lens when the others are. Sometimes it looks like they're looking your way, but slightly off the lenses axis. Aside from this I think you've done a great job. _________________
Cameras: Canon 7D, Olympus OM-2n, Spotmatic SPII
M42: Sonnar 135/3.5, Flektogon 35/2.4, SMC Takumar 50/1.4, SMC Takumar 55/1.8, SMC Takumar 35/3.5
Tamron: SP 90/2.5 Macro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Thank you all for commenting!
Especially Orio ! Your detailed information about each photograph helps amazingly further.
I was thinking about toning aspects as well a lot. Nearly all of them have a little toning, sometimes not quite noticeable at first glance. I gave each photograph a different toning, just as a nouance and I found it interesting how it affects the character of the photograph. The sepia toning is maybe too hard.
I think now I will make prints without and with toning and compare them next to each other, so I may get a better overview.
Very true about the persons who didn't look right in the camera, it gives a strage feel indeed. I haven't be aware about it at all.
I'll have to look up each photograph ... maybe I can exchange some heads
Many thanks again !
@Timo
amazing that you recognized the Grand Hotel of Zell! Have you spent holidays there ?
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FernandoB12
Joined: 26 Apr 2009 Posts: 231 Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FernandoB12 wrote:
I like all, #2 and #10 are the best.. _________________ Camera: Nikon D80 Canon 20D Pentax Spotmatic
Manual Lens: Nikkor 24mm f/2.8; Nikkor Ai 50mm f/1.4; Nikkor 50mm f/2.0; Nikkor Micro AI 55mm f/3.5; Nikkor H 85mm f/1.8; Nikkor P.C 105mm f/2.5; Nikkor Q 135mm f/2.8; Nikkor P 180mm f/2.8; Nikon Series E 75~150mm f/3.5;
SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4; SMC Takumar 55mm f/1.8; Super Takumar 85mm f/1.9; Takumar S-M-C 120mm f/2.8; Takumar S-M-C 200mm f/4; Tele Takumar 300mm f/6.3
Vivitar Series 1 Macro 105mm 2.5
Helios M44-4 58mm f/2; Soligor 350mm f/5.6; Soligor 135mm f/2.8;
AF Lens: AF-S Nikkor 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED; AF Nikkor 70-210mm f/4-5.6; |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
tobbsman wrote: |
I'll have to look up each photograph ... maybe I can exchange some heads |
Perhaps it could be easier (and more natural looking as well) to just replace the inside of the eyes, or, if you don't have suitable photos for replacement, to try "shifting" the eyeballs.
I think it will be worth it, there are many very good photos that are only limited by this aspect. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pich900
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 1745 Location: The Netherlands/Zwolle
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
pich900 wrote:
I'm also agree with the comments from Orio...to make it simple and to not repeat what already said Orio, for all pictures, I would like to see a little bit more contrast.....
Anyway, it's for sure a great job, especialy for a first time session and within only 2 hours ......If I must only keep one or two in this serie, I will keep the first one, great compo and perfect B&W rendering...and for a CD booklet, I will definitly take the # 11, without the "sepia" effect but with the same rendering as #1...... _________________ All my lenses are for sale, nikkor, Angenieux, Zeiss etc.....
Regards,
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------
Nikon D700 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3245 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
Great composition in the first one.
What lighting did you use? _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Thanks pitch and Himself !
@Himself
I think it was only spotlights from the concert room, can't remember exacly.
@Orio
Exchanging heads/eyes worked perfect, what a difference ! I'll show some results later ...
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 7:12 pm Post subject: Re: [C&C] Saxophone Quartet - various SMCs |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
tobbsman wrote: |
I did a 2 hours photo-session with some musician colleagues last weekend.
They asked for B&W photographs for their CD booklet and web-comercials.
It was a lot of fun to do, I learned a lot. Really difficult to control light with 4 persons.
Equipment:
K20D & many MF and AF lenses
2 x 540 FGZ wireless
Cristics very welcome, because I did this for the first time ...
1
|
Great picture, but what a strange way to hold a bari sax. I would have opted for a more natural pose there. _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Yes, true.
The guy who played the barriton sax didn't use a belt, so he had to lean it on his leg. Quite heavy such an instrument
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
tobbsman wrote: |
Yes, true.
The guy who played the barriton sax didn't use a belt, so he had to lean it on his leg. Quite heavy such an instrument |
LOL! I know
I see the reason ... it only looks funny (but probably only to a fellow bari sax player) _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
#14 for me _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|