View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:51 pm Post subject: nonsense |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
This was shot today at a nice autumn/winter walk. I was just looking through my shots from today on the laptop and discovered this one which
made me think: why the hack did I made this photograph ?
If you had once the same situation you're warmly welcome to post your nonsense-shots here in the thread ...
S.M.C. Takumar 85/1.8 @ f2
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Snow already - we just got our first of the season at 1200m. Actually quite like it
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1922 Location: Slovenija
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
wow...
I really like the "isolation" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Liquid manure transporter converted to a mobile water container and resting place for the crows. Didn´t know why I took this pic.
AF shot with ef 4/300
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I like it for the snow it looks like icing sugar just dusted over the ground instead of the usual total whiteness? and the focal point on the cart is interesting.
Love yours too Rolf.I would not call these "nonsense" photos. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
More than the "why" (only you can reply), I am struck by another apparent nonsense: the foreground and background appear to be (more or less) focused, while the middle ground appears blurred. This can not happen with a normal lens (nor probably with any lens). So I am puzzled now. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Orio wrote: |
More than the "why" (only you can reply), I am struck by another apparent nonsense: the foreground and background appear to be (more or less) focused, while the middle ground appears blurred. This can not happen with a normal lens (nor probably with any lens). So I am puzzled now. |
+1 something wrong with this tak or pp _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Here's my contribution, I hate to think this is a manure transporter converted into a Barbecue Trailer
bbq trailer by Nesster, on Flickr _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Now another subtle psycho-analytical pattern surfaces: why all people who contribute their nonsense pictures here post images of containers? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Nice to see that this turned into a slurry-container thread. I like yours very much too, Rolf. And Nesster, I was just thinking how delicious will taste the barbecue chicken if this container was once full of liquid manure
Quote: |
This can not happen with a normal lens (nor probably with any lens) |
Orio, it can because Tak 85/1.8 isn't just a normal lens
Seriously, this was developed from Raw and just some minor Unsharp Mask was applied.
With shooting I had the focus ring about 2-3 mm away from infinity. lens was @ f2.
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
tobbsman wrote: |
Seriously, this was developed from Raw and just some minor Unsharp Mask was applied.
With shooting I had the focus ring about 2-3 mm away from infinity. lens was @ f2. |
Then how could this happen? Going from plane to plane this is what I see:
- foreground is sharpest (container is where obviously the focus is)
- leftmost middle ground trees are sharp (ok)
- middle ground right house is strongly blurred (but it's not that far away from the leftmost trees)
- lefthand middle ground houses are sharper than the right house, which is closer than them (how could that be?)
- right side of the hill (behind the right house) is strongly blurred
- left side of the hill, behind the leftmost houses, is visibly sharper than the right side of hill and right house (how could that be?)
- second hill (with large fir trees) is visibly sharper than the first hill (how could that be?)
Seriously, there is a big focus mess going on with your picture. I am unable to explain the reason. If you did not post-produce,
the only possible explaination that I can find is that your lens has a serious decentering problem on the right of visual field.
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Yes, really true. Very massy all the sharp and oof areas. I neither can't see a regularity in the strange effect. Only that everything gets more blured towards the upper right corner.
Yesterday I did nearly all shots on f2, so will have a look at the other samples and analyze if the focus-mass-effect appears there too. I'll post them lateron.
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
all those pics in this thread doesn't make sense to me
here is one of mine, I hope it will make sense for you
flektogon 20:4 on 5DII
_________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Haha, great flektogonisation you made there !
Is it flektonized with tripod ? (I am just wondering because I don't see it next to your feet; should have been a small apperture I guess)
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
Just to show y'all something about myself: I like all of these shots, and understand completely why I would have made them, if not y'all ... _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
tobbs wrote: |
Is it flektonized with tripod ? |
no tripod, it was f8 - 1/50s - 400 iso _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
poilu wrote: |
tobbs wrote: |
Is it flektonized with tripod ? |
no tripod, it was f8 - 1/50s - 400 iso |
Mediterranean light, Tobias. When you are near to the sea, it seems to shine from everywhere. You need to add at least 1 f/stop to the sunny 16 rule
Tripod is almost unknown there _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
poilu wrote: |
all those pics in this thread doesn't make sense to me
here is one of mine, I hope it will make sense for you
flektogon 20:4 on 5DII
|
I don't worry much about making "photographic sense". To quote David Byrne, "Stop Making Sense". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|