| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:08 pm Post subject: My worst lens. |
 |
|
estudleon wrote:
I can remember as the worst lens that I had, the voigtlander 1080 mm an ugly monster formed by :
Any voigtlander SRL camera with
135/4 super dinarex
40,5 mm to 27 mm adapter
8 x 30 zeiss
(8 x 135 mm = 1080 mm).
Ugly circular image of 12 mm of radio.
You could did a 400 mm in this form too. (normal 50 mm plus adapter plus 8 x 30)
Think that in contaflex (only the 400 mm -50 mm plus 8 x 30-) whole 24 x 36 mm. negative were setting.
And yours?
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 4045
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
This is unfair: I can make any lens absolute crap by putting a pair of binoculars or a bad filter in front of it. 
My own bad lens? I don't know any yet. Maybe the cheap Walimex 500/8 I tried once. It was utter crap, but it wasn't my lens so I am not really in the position to complain about it.
_________________
Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I did drop only one lens int paper trash , that was a revuenon zoom, super crap...
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
greg
Joined: 21 Mar 2009
Posts: 683
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
greg wrote:
Phoenix 100-400mm F4.5-6.7 Telephoto
Real junque
It's an AF I know, but I'm just getting into MF.
Last edited by greg on Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
| Spotmatic wrote: |
This is unfair: I can make any lens absolute crap by putting a pair of binoculars or a bad filter in front of it.
My own bad lens? I don't know any yet. Maybe the cheap Walimex 500/8 I tried once. It was utter crap, but it wasn't my lens so I am not really in the position to complain about it. |
Yes, of course.
But the monocular 8 x 30 were published by Zeiss and voigtlander (at that moment both the same, think) like the form that their cams could have a 400 and/or 1080 mm lens with a zeiss attachment.
It was an "official" combination, not my idea. For that reason I consider this "combo" like one lens.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 2495
Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I think all of my really poor performing lenses had loosy or twisted lens element. I was quite disappointed by performance of many retrofocal lenses under 30mm.
_________________
(almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Soligor 3.5/35-140 (My worst lens ever! With a distance!), Tamron Twin-Tele 5.5/225 (in the twin set-up), Revuenon-Special 2.8/35 (I had two copies and both were equally bad) and Auto Reflecta 1.7/55 (I have never seen such a bad "50" before and afterwards, perhaps there was something wrong with this lens).
Another really crap lens was a Tokina AF 28-80.
The thing is, I normally like Soligor and Tokina lenses and I have seen excellent versions but also these two terrible ones - abyssmal!
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de
Last edited by LucisPictor on Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 4045
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Oh yes, I thought about MF lenses only and of course then it's hard to name bad lenses
But my worst lens undoubtedly was the Tamron 28-200 AF lens. It was just too soft to be useful on an APS-C camera.
_________________
Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
My worst lens?
Probably the Sigma 10-20 autofocus: worst corner image quality that I ever met. Muddy up to f/11
The lens was very useful on APS-C however. Only way to really shoot wide. But forget about geometry. 
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Samyang 100-500mm lens. Could not get a sharp photo at all. No matter the setting or distance. Every photo was like you had smeared Vaseline on the front element.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Toeteraar
Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 163
Location: Dronten Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Toeteraar wrote:
Two lenses are sharing the end of my list.
My first 135 was a Makinon with a strange close-focussing mechanism. The quality of the Makinon seemed more like a no-focussing mechanism, i have not achieved one really sharp shot with it. At last it was replaced by a Takumar 2.8/105mm that is still in my collection.
The other worst lens was a Pentor 28mm that performed not quite as one would expect even from a cheap wideangle. It seemed not to perform at all, but at the time it was the only wideangle i could afford. I finally got rid of it exchanging it for a Tokina 28mm(it got some € 3 off the price of the Tokina)
To make sure that it was no incidental lack of quality i tried a few Pentor 28's at the camerafair in Houten recently and they were all as crappy as the one i had.
_________________
DSLR: EOS30D,EOS350D,K-M Dynax 5D, Sony Alfa500, Olympus E-330, Pentax K20D
LensesLoads of lenses, except that particular one
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 2050
Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
Yes!!!
The Tammy 28-200 a truly 'soft' lens, and one that extended like an elephant's trunk, from quite reasonable to plain embarrassing - Pentax badged this lens too, and I had both versions, they scored 1.7 on the photo.de reviews scale - and almost the lowest MTF ever recorded!!!!
So.. unless you know a better candidate? lol
Doug.
PS - Oddly the Tammy LD/IF 70-300mm AF is an unsung hero in the value / performance stakes, so we all know they could do better!
| Spotmatic wrote: |
Oh yes, I thought about MF lenses only and of course then it's hard to name bad lenses
But my worst lens undoubtedly was the Tamron 28-200 AF lens. It was just too soft to be useful on an APS-C camera. |
_________________
Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 2530
Location: Thach Alabama
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
| nemesis101 wrote: |
Yes!!!
The Tammy 28-200 a truly 'soft' lens, and one that extended like an elephant's trunk, from quite reasonable to plain embarrassing - Pentax badged this lens too, and I had both versions, they scored 1.7 on the photo.de reviews scale - and almost the lowest MTF ever recorded!!!!
So.. unless you know a better candidate? lol
Doug.
PS - Oddly the Tammy LD/IF 70-300mm AF is an unsung hero in the value / performance stakes, so we all know they could do better!
| Spotmatic wrote: |
Oh yes, I thought about MF lenses only and of course then it's hard to name bad lenses
But my worst lens undoubtedly was the Tamron 28-200 AF lens. It was just too soft to be useful on an APS-C camera. |
|
I had a Tamron LD 70-300 and it was a great performer. Wonderful closeups and long distance. I agree with your assessment 100%.
_________________
Big Dawg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
My worst lens?
Probably the Sigma 10-20 autofocus: worst corner image quality that I ever met. Muddy up to f/11
The lens was very useful on APS-C however. Only way to really shoot wide. But forget about geometry. |
I did use it one times if I remember as well for my eyes was okay 
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
| Attila wrote: |
| Orio wrote: |
My worst lens?
Probably the Sigma 10-20 autofocus: worst corner image quality that I ever met. Muddy up to f/11
The lens was very useful on APS-C however. Only way to really shoot wide. But forget about geometry. |
I did use it one times if I remember as well for my eyes was okay |
Yes, it was an OK lens for the purpose.
Fact is, I never bought really bad lenses. I always avoided them. So there are surely worst lenses than the Sigma, but I never used them.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
voytek
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 891
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
Focal 2.8/135 - between other lenses when I purchased "camera & lenses bag", Focal 4/200 T2 received as gift, Tokina AF 2.8-4.6/28-70 - my first purchase after receiving Pentax K10D body
_________________
Cheers, Voytek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mike Deep
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 323
Location: Upstate New York
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Deep wrote:
The worst lens I've ever used was some Underground-branded 80-200 f4.5 in OM mount. It was soft at all apertures, soft at all focal lengths, and couldn't even reach infinity focus properly. I tore it apart one day as a learning experience and kept the front element to use as a diopter.
Another one I should probably mention is the Canon EF 70-210 f4 push-pull. Pretty awful wide open, soft and rife with ugly CA in OOF areas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Some remarks to the Tamron 28-200:
There are many different versions of this lens, so please do not put them all into one drawer!
I had the chance to compare an AF 28-200 and an MF 28-200.
The Tamron 3.8-5.6/28-200 Asph. LF (IF) as the MF-lens and the Tamron 3.8-5.6/28-200 AF Asph. XR (IF) as the AF-lens.
None of these lenses is soft. The newer AF-Tamron is a little sharper but the "older" MF-Tamron is not much behind it! As far as personality is concerned, I would prefer the "older" MF-version, the AF-Tamron can be sterile sometimes. To be honest, I guess that these are some of the best "Superzoom" lenses you can find!
Actually, I really like both 28-200 since either one is better than my even newer (and much more expensive) Tamron 28-300 ever was! Although that one was a "digitally optimized" version.
The only "problem" I had was the 28mm wide end which equals about 42mm on a Nikon/Fuji crop cam (with which I used them). A lens that offer a zoom range from 42 to 300 is not really useful for me, nor for my dad who owns the AF-version. (He will replace it with an 18-200 soon for short one-lens trips.)
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cpn
Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cpn wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
Probably the Sigma 10-20 autofocus: worst corner image quality that I ever met. Muddy up to f/11
The lens was very useful on APS-C however. Only way to really shoot wide. But forget about geometry. |
That is so true! 
It is my worst lens as well, I never use it under f/11 where it is still quite weak on the corners - the only good thing being the 10mm really...if Nikon only made more of the 13/5.6 back then for us manual-on-dx-users
_________________
Nikon D40 + 20/4 Ai - 24/2.8 N - 28/2.8 Ais - 35/2 Ai - 50/1.4 Ais - 50/1.8 Ais - 50/1.8 E - 50/2 Ai - 55/3.5 P.C - 105/2.5 Ais - 135/2.8 Q.C - 180/2.8 Ais - 50-300/4.5 Ai |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10472
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
my worst lens is the nikkor 55:3.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shad309
Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 453
Location: Illinois, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shad309 wrote:
I don't think I have one now. I have gotten rid of the lenses I didn't like. The worst lens I ever had I think was a Tamron 28-200mm AF lens.
_________________
Canon 400D & 350D
Lenses- German, Japanese, & Russian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
| poilu wrote: |
| my worst lens is the nikkor 55:3.5 |
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| poilu wrote: |
| my worst lens is the nikkor 55:3.5 |
Seems you never took any bad ones if this was worst.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007
Posts: 2190
Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
My mamiya/sekor 1.4/50mm. It was too good. So desirable in fact my ex-gf stole it!
~Marc |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 1525
Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
My worst lens is the POS kit lens that came with my EOS Kiss-F. Such a POS that I don't even know what it is. Some generic 18-50. OIS is nice and AF is fast (but that's probably the Canon body, not the lens), but that's about it. I'm so unimpressed with it that I don't even consider it part of my lens arsenal. Good thing I'm getting rid of it soon, along with the Kiss-F, as part of my 5D fund
_________________
Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
