| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 3614
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:14 pm Post subject: Canon FD 50 f1.2 - set 2 |
 |
|
trifox wrote:
It's me again with my boring stuff  ....
Just showing more shots wide open -- post-process LightRoom and Photoshop..
Some vignetting visible at f1.2 ...
#1 - f1.2
#2 - f1.2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7 - f1.2
#8 - f1.2
#9 - f1.2
_________________
Flickr.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 8551
Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Delightful portraits. Very nice lens
patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 2108
Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Yes, very nice portraits.
_________________
Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 2578
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
 congrats trifox, greats shos again.
The Cat-shot is outstanding
Cheers
Tobias
_________________
Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10472
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
great samples, shocking quality wide open! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 3614
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
thanks for all replies and comments..
@ poilu - yes, the lens is very good even wide open -- borders blurred but around the center is all fine.
@ tobias -- quite lucky shot -- very rare situation I must say ..
thanks again ..
tf
_________________
Flickr.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
raay04
Joined: 08 Dec 2012
Posts: 340
Location: India
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
raay04 wrote:
Which version of the lens is this?? old breach lock mount or FDn mount??
_________________
Cameras-Point and shoot- Powershot A590IS Mirroless-SONY NEX-3
Lenses
M42 Mount
Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Super-Takumar 50/1.4 ,SMC Takumar 50/1.4 ,MC Helios 44M7-58/2,MC Helios 77M-4 50/1.8,Helios 44-2(valdai), Zenitar-M 50/1.7 Pentacon 50/1.8, MC Jupiter-37AM 135/3.5, Industar 50-2 50/3.5
Nikon F mount
Vivitar close focus 28/2.8(Komine) Keleinar 5N 100/2.8
LTM
Jupiter 8 50/2
KIEV
Jupiter8M ( element donor lens )
Minolta SR(MD)
MD 35/1.8, MD 35-70/3.5 macro, MD 50/1.4 ,Vivitar Auto macro 55/2.8,
Canon FD
FDn50/1.4
Minolta AF
Vivitar (cosina) 100/3.5 macro
Minolta AF 35-70/4
Enlarger
EL NIKKOR 50/2.8
Adaptall
Tamron 24/2.5 , Tamron sp 90/2.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I believe if it is the 50mm f/1.2, then it is nFD. The breechlock was a 55mm lens. Canon produced this lens in both L and non-L versions, just as they produced the 55mm breechlock in both Aspherical and plain (non-Aspherical) versions.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
raay04
Joined: 08 Dec 2012
Posts: 340
Location: India
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
raay04 wrote:
| cooltouch wrote: |
| I believe if it is the 50mm f/1.2, then it is nFD. The breechlock was a 55mm lens. Canon produced this lens in both L and non-L versions, just as they produced the 55mm breechlock in both Aspherical and plain (non-Aspherical) versions. |
Thanks ,thats what i wanted to know!! Iam eyeing a FDn 50/1.2 but i can also get a 55/1.2 at same price ,both are non L !!! can you advice which one to get???
_________________
Cameras-Point and shoot- Powershot A590IS Mirroless-SONY NEX-3
Lenses
M42 Mount
Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Super-Takumar 50/1.4 ,SMC Takumar 50/1.4 ,MC Helios 44M7-58/2,MC Helios 77M-4 50/1.8,Helios 44-2(valdai), Zenitar-M 50/1.7 Pentacon 50/1.8, MC Jupiter-37AM 135/3.5, Industar 50-2 50/3.5
Nikon F mount
Vivitar close focus 28/2.8(Komine) Keleinar 5N 100/2.8
LTM
Jupiter 8 50/2
KIEV
Jupiter8M ( element donor lens )
Minolta SR(MD)
MD 35/1.8, MD 35-70/3.5 macro, MD 50/1.4 ,Vivitar Auto macro 55/2.8,
Canon FD
FDn50/1.4
Minolta AF
Vivitar (cosina) 100/3.5 macro
Minolta AF 35-70/4
Enlarger
EL NIKKOR 50/2.8
Adaptall
Tamron 24/2.5 , Tamron sp 90/2.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I don't know how I could miss this thread of Trifox - #7 is beautiful !!
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 1077
Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
| I don't know how I could miss this thread of Trifox - #7 is beautiful !! |
+1
I love the cat shot (#3). Focusing such a photo is a challenge.
_________________
Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
| raay04 wrote: |
| cooltouch wrote: |
| I believe if it is the 50mm f/1.2, then it is nFD. The breechlock was a 55mm lens. Canon produced this lens in both L and non-L versions, just as they produced the 55mm breechlock in both Aspherical and plain (non-Aspherical) versions. |
Thanks ,thats what i wanted to know!! Iam eyeing a FDn 50/1.2 but i can also get a 55/1.2 at same price ,both are non L !!! can you advice which one to get??? |
They are different optical formulae, but I can't speak as to which is better. For sure, the 50/1.2 is the more modern formula and it has the more recent coatings formula. But the 55/1.2 is much more massive and a stouter build, for sure.
I would be most interested in seeing a side-by-side comparison of the 50/1.2 vs. the 55/1.2, just as I would be most interested in seeing a side-by-side comparison of the 50/1.2L vs. the 55/1.2 Aspherical.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2155
Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
They are very nice. Most impressive.
_________________
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010
Posts: 345
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
Superb quality!
_________________
Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
beomagi
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 46
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
beomagi wrote:
| cooltouch wrote: |
| They are different optical formulae, but I can't speak as to which is better. For sure, the 50/1.2 is the more modern formula and it has the more recent coatings formula. But the 55/1.2 is much more massive and a stouter build, for sure. |
Wish I knew as well. I've been scouring for "normal" F1.2s for a while. I have the 55mm F1.2 and love it, but i'm an addict.
My understanding is the 50mm lens is sharper, but 55mm gives a nicer Bokeh. Cannot confirm if true, just impression I've picked up from various forums.
BTW, I wouldn't worry about the coatings on FD 55s, they're very well controlled, especially if it's SSC formula. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
