View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rpo83
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 276 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:58 am Post subject: S-M-C Tak 50/1.4.....Sell or Keep ?????? |
|
|
rpo83 wrote:
I'm after some advice on whether to keep my 50/1.4.
I am having focus issues on my Sigma, i think the registration distance may be wrong for the SD14.
As i am totally blown away with the sharpness of the Vario 35-70 f4 ROM and the Elmarit 60 I am questioning the need for a 50 and so i am thinking of selling it
I know the idea is only to buy, and i have definately caught LBA disease, (i have bought 14 lenses in the last 3 months) but maybe it is time to let one of them go.....
Do you think i'm making a mistake selling this lens? If i decide to want another, will it be easy to replace?
What are they worth, it has the caps as shown but no case.
It is immaculate, check out the pics.
I've got to stop taking pics of my lenses, i hadn't noticed the yellowing until now!!!
_________________ Cheers
Steve
Sigma SD10, Sigma SD14, Sigma SD14R, Sigma DP1s
Leica Lenses
Elmarit R 1:2.8/16mm, Elmarit R 1:2.8/28mm, Macro Elmarit R 1:2.8/60mm, Macro Elmar R 1:4/100 Bellows, APO Telyt R 1:3.4/180mm, Telyt R 1 :4/250mm, Vario Elmar R 1:4/35-70mm ROM, Vario Elmar R 1:4.5/75-200 Novoflex... Noflexar 1:38/200mm
M42... Carl Zeiss... Pancolar 1:1.8/80, Asahi Pentax... Super Takumar 1:3.5/35mm, S-M-C Takumar 1:1.4/50mm, Jupiter... 1:2/85mm, Pentacon... 1:2.8/135mm MC,
My Flickr Page
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpo83/
High Res gallery on dpreview, click original
http://www.dpreview.com/Galleries/7079430607/photos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2578 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
I have the P-K version of this lens and I would never ever sell it. It's one of my favourites under my collection. It's capable to render razorsharp images and special creamy bokeh!
Cheers
Tobias _________________ Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
They seem to be selling well on OZeBay $100+,but there is a glut at the moment...everyone is putting them up for auction.Not necessary the 50/1.4.but a lot of pentax small lenses. Is it the top of the market...hmmmm _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CarbonR
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 Posts: 1969 Location: Clermont-Ferrand, France
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
CarbonR wrote:
I suggest not to sell, not to keep, but simply give it to me _________________ Cameras : Canon 5D, Pentax K100D, Pentax 6x7, Spotmatic
Lenses : 15mm to 1000mm (24x36)
My websites : [FR & ENG]Takumar - the eyes of the Spotmatic : info about all Takumar lenses // Kogaku - My photo site
I am selling : Takumar lenses and rare Pentax bodies, pm me if you're interested in something [MFLenses feed-back]
Information on Takumar lenses with samples :
Wide angle : Takumar 15/3.5 15mm, Takumar 17/4 17mm, Takumar 18/11 18mm, Takumar 20/4.5 20mm, Takumar 24/3.5 24mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V1 28mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V2 28mm, Takumar 35/2 V1 35mm, Takumar 35/2 V2 35mm, Takumar 35/2.3 35mm, Takumar 35/3.5 35mm, Takumar 35/4 35mm
Standard : Takumar 50/1.4 V1 50mm, Takumar 50/1.4 V2 50mm, Takumar 50/3.5 50mm, Takumar 50/4 50mm, Takumar 55/2 55/1.8 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V1 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V2 55mm, Takumar 58/2 58mm, Takumar 58/2.4 58mm
Short tele : Takumar 83/1.9 83mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85/1.9 85mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85mm, Takumar 100/2 100mm, Takumar 100/3.5 100mm, Takumar 100/4 100mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V1 105mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V2 105mm, Takumar 120/2.8 120mm
Telephoto : Takumar 135/2.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/2.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 150/4 V1 150mm, Takumar 150/4 V2 150mm
Long tele : Takumar 200/3.5 200mm, Takumar 200/4 200mm, Takumar 200/5.6 200mm, Takumar 300/4 V1 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V2 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V3 300mm, Takumar 300/6.3 300mm, Takumar 400/5.6 400mm, Takumar 500/4.5 500mm, Takumar 500/5 500mm, Takumar 1000/8 V1 1000mm, Takumar 1000/8 V2 1000mm
Zoom : Zoom-Takumar 45~125/4 , Zoom-Takumar 70~150/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 85~210/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 135~600/6.7
Achromatic : Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85/4.5 , Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 300/5.6 300mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Don't do it. I have sold many lenses, but I still regret selling the lenses of which I didn't have another copy. Save yourself the hassle and keep it... There will be one moment in the future that you wish that you had a lens with a much shorter DOF.
Remember: there's more to a picture than just sharpness. Your other lenses may be sharper (although I find the Tak really sharp), but being sharp is not the #1 reason for the existence of the 50mm f/1.4 S-M-C Takumar. Believe me: you will learn to appreciate the merits of the Takumar. _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
Dont know on which Cam you do use the SMC Takumar..
If you use it on a crop, keep it in your pocket. If you use or plan to upgrade to a FF Body, sell this nice lens.
I like some of the Pentax Lenses, mostly the 2.8/105 and the 1.9/85mm i did own and used for Portraits on my EOS 5D.
The wider ones from Pentax arent my favorites.. I did sell all of them.
But if you like to play around with the "swirly" bokeh, keep the Pentax.
Greetz
Hinnerker _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
hinnerker wrote: |
But if you like to play around with the "swirly" bokeh, keep the Pentax.
|
Swirly bokeh on the SMC 50/1.4? I haven't seen that before. _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
hinnerker wrote: |
But if you like to play around with the "swirly" bokeh, keep the Pentax.
|
Swirly bokeh on the SMC 50/1.4? I haven't seen that before. |
Hi,
this is a cross image-post from a german forum, where Urmelchen (his nickname) showed a sample of the Super Takumar 1.4/50mm Bokeh..
(thanks Urmelchen!)
Maybe not the SMC Version? But i think thats "swirly" enough.
And in the highlight you will find the so called "catseye"-effect
Greetz
Hinnerker _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
But if you want to play around with these bokeh-effects, the Elmarit 60 and the Summilux can do it in the same way for you..
The Summilux:
Your Makro Elmarit:
So there is not really need to keep this Takumar under this aspects..
Greetz
Hinnerker _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
hinnerker wrote: |
But if you like to play around with the "swirly" bokeh, keep the Pentax.
|
Swirly bokeh on the SMC 50/1.4? I haven't seen that before. |
I would not qualify the bokeh of the Trak 1.4/50 as swirly either, much more so as quiet and smooth.
1 st sample wide open ( consider this is ISO 800 ), other samples stopped down various f stops, last one again wide open or close to wide open
_________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
You are right with the bokeh in your images, but non of your shots are taken at f1.4 on a 5D Fullframe with highlights around. All your samples are taken in shadow situations and in addition on a crop cam.
Try a 1.4 shot in nearfield (not close up) with some reflecting surfaces like leaves or so what in the oof area/background..
So than you can see the behavior of the lens in this bokeh situation.
But maybe iam wrong and the behavior of the Super Takumar and the SMC Takumar are different. In only know the Super Tak, i did own only for a very short time.
Greetz
Hinnerker _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasan
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
hasan wrote:
Hello Steve,
your copy seems to be in a very good shape. There are ways to get rid of the yellowing. Look here: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/458769-post5.html
Me personally, I wouldn't sell it.
I can't often enough link to this: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-02-11-24.shtml _________________ Pentax Z20 |Pentax K100D |SMC K35/3.5 |SMC K50/1.4 |SMC A50/1.4
|SMC K135/2.5 |SMC DA18-55 |SMC FA80-320 |AR 135/2.8(Chinon) |AR 55/1.4(M42)
|Sigma MF 90/2.8 |Sigma 28-80/3.5-5.6 |Exakta 24/2.8 |Vivitar 2x Macro Focusing TC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
hinnerker wrote: |
You are right with the bokeh in your images, but non of your shots are taken at f1.4 on a 5D Fullframe with highlights around. All your samples are taken in shadow situations and in addition on a crop cam.
Try a 1.4 shot in nearfield (not close up) with some reflecting surfaces like leaves or so what in the oof area/background..
So than you can see the behavior of the lens in this bokeh situation....
Greetz
Hinnerker |
I do not have a FF, but you are right, even on APS-C it does get swirly in the situations you describe
and to make the situation about the various 1.4/50 made by Pentax more confusing here a bit of swirly on the Pentax M 1.4/50:
greetings,
Andreas _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Hey, that girl has six fingers! _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
Hey, that girl has six fingers! |
and to the OP...I'd never sell it!
concerning it's bokeh, a quote from the luminous landscape article about this lens linked above by member Hasan, quote:
'All these lenses are classic Planar designs, as are more or less every fast 50mm except for the Leica M lens, which is an idiosyncratic design unique to Leica; but where most makers have economized by making the surfaces between the fourth and fifth elements flat, Pentax has always stuck with the original design and used cemented spherical surfaces there. Aside from being more expensive to manufacture, this results in a lens that is slightly less sharp at infinity in the plane of focus, but that has better off-axis aberration correction and thus, better bokeh or blur' _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections
Last edited by kuuan on Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:22 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
Keep it. This is one of my two faves 50mm in M42.
_________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rpo83
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 276 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rpo83 wrote:
Well, this seems a hot topic. Thanks for all the input guys.
Would anyone have an idea why the focus is way off, what i see in the viewfinder has no bearing on the image, and if i set the lens up using hyperfocal guidelines, it is also way out
It has a light shield, that potentially can damage the IR filter on the Sigma SD14, i dont want to modify the lens by cutting this light sheild, so i am assuming the issue is that i cant get the rear element where it should be to work with my camera... does this make sense?
At this point in time i want to keep exploring the foveon sensor, but i would love a full frame DSLR down the track...
I understand the yellowing is not cause for concern, it just needs some UV exposure. I have looked at past sales on eBay and the prices vary wildly What does the brains trust believe it is worth?? _________________ Cheers
Steve
Sigma SD10, Sigma SD14, Sigma SD14R, Sigma DP1s
Leica Lenses
Elmarit R 1:2.8/16mm, Elmarit R 1:2.8/28mm, Macro Elmarit R 1:2.8/60mm, Macro Elmar R 1:4/100 Bellows, APO Telyt R 1:3.4/180mm, Telyt R 1 :4/250mm, Vario Elmar R 1:4/35-70mm ROM, Vario Elmar R 1:4.5/75-200 Novoflex... Noflexar 1:38/200mm
M42... Carl Zeiss... Pancolar 1:1.8/80, Asahi Pentax... Super Takumar 1:3.5/35mm, S-M-C Takumar 1:1.4/50mm, Jupiter... 1:2/85mm, Pentacon... 1:2.8/135mm MC,
My Flickr Page
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpo83/
High Res gallery on dpreview, click original
http://www.dpreview.com/Galleries/7079430607/photos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mflex-on
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mflex-on wrote:
I have to get one! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Not sell the very good lenses. And the S-M-C is a very good ones.
I never beleave the high optical quality of it till I try the lens. WOW. Very sharp. Not very contrast but enough (Pancolar MC 1,8/50 has more contrast)
But the IQ is great to me. It's in the Leica M level (it reminds me the summilux 1,4/50 1966 version that I had time ago). No cast, not warm, neutral tones. Has the resolution power and contrast that I like. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Sell it if you don't use it. Mflex-on needs one!
But I keep mine, for sure. In use the yellowing disappears, and a bit yellow on digital is easy enough to correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
egidio
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 222 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
egidio wrote:
great lens, its a keeper. If its yellow just put it on a sunlight for couple of days or(and) under UV lamp for few nigts. _________________ I use: Flektogon 2.8/20, Flektogon 2.8/35, planar 50mm/1.4, Takumar 1.4/50mm, Takumar 1.9/85, MIR 24H, Mir1v, Industar-50-2, Helios-44-2, Pentacon 2.8/135, cyclop 85 1.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
egidio wrote: |
great lens, its a keeper. If its yellow just put it on a sunlight for couple of days or(and) under UV lamp for few nigts. |
It doesnt work. You can read this fairytale - hint all over the world..
the truth is, it doesnt work. Me and some others did follow this hints some years ago with the CZJ 1.8/50mm "Zebra" Pancolars and some other lenses, which have got Thorium element in the glas. None of the hints works. For me, thats a big fairytale. Everyone read this fairytale, tells to the neighboor.. but it did not work in reallity.
The only way which works, shot your image with the lens and correct the yellowness in Photoshop or other programs.
Greetz
Hinnerker _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mflex-on
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mflex-on wrote:
For me the sun did a good job. I tried to de-yellow my Pancolar. It took not only days but weeks in the sun. "Yellow" moved to "yellowish tone". It’s ok now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Perhaps the Takumars de-yellow faster than the Pancolars. I know from direct experience sunlight works with the Takumars.
I wouldn't sell this fine lens unless either I needed the money or had no space where to keep it, and hadn't used it for years. But the wonderful thing about our hobby is that different people will see different things and value different things... and with any older equipment any manufacturing tolerances have been magnified by the life experience of a given lens. Some have gone to war and experienced pestilence, while others have grown temperamental and frustrated having led a coddled but lonely life. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rpo83
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Posts: 276 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rpo83 wrote:
I am going to try and find the time this weekend to figure out what is happening with the focus. I have a feeling that the problem may have been one of my adapters.
I don't need to sell it, i have space, but i suppose i was trying to get you guys to justify me selling the lens, bad choice on my behalf, it seems we all suffer from chronic LBA
I should have known better...... _________________ Cheers
Steve
Sigma SD10, Sigma SD14, Sigma SD14R, Sigma DP1s
Leica Lenses
Elmarit R 1:2.8/16mm, Elmarit R 1:2.8/28mm, Macro Elmarit R 1:2.8/60mm, Macro Elmar R 1:4/100 Bellows, APO Telyt R 1:3.4/180mm, Telyt R 1 :4/250mm, Vario Elmar R 1:4/35-70mm ROM, Vario Elmar R 1:4.5/75-200 Novoflex... Noflexar 1:38/200mm
M42... Carl Zeiss... Pancolar 1:1.8/80, Asahi Pentax... Super Takumar 1:3.5/35mm, S-M-C Takumar 1:1.4/50mm, Jupiter... 1:2/85mm, Pentacon... 1:2.8/135mm MC,
My Flickr Page
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rpo83/
High Res gallery on dpreview, click original
http://www.dpreview.com/Galleries/7079430607/photos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|