| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:57 am Post subject: Koni Rapid Omega 100, 6x7 truck shots |
 |
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Got the film from Wallies and did a few scans:
blue mack
teardrop
Portra 400VC film |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2155
Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
They look great Bill. Very nice work.
I'd like to own that Mack they made into a pickup.
_________________
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Thanks, Ron, I had 5 of these worked up but it occurred to me that I'm
not all that into trucks!  These two were the most interesting, and not
by much, either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 8551
Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
I see #1 has New York plates - just imagine driving that down 5th Avenue in Manhattan! 
patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Some of those trucks really have nice design!
Great image quality as always, Bill - what was the camera-lens?
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Orio, these were with the Super-Omegon 3.5/90 lens. The 58mm wide
would have been nice, still looking for one. KRO 100=Koni Rapid Omega 100, 6x7. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
This camera makes images so clear that they could have been output by my 5DMkII, I am stunned.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Awesome image quality  Congrats! Like a good folder 
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 3614
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
katastrofo -- these images are superb!
It seems to be that the RAPID OMEGA is one of the best in its league ..
and generally unbeatable by digital cameras ...
tf
_________________
Flickr.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Whoever changed the thread title, thanks, in the interest of clarity I should have spelled it out.
Thanks for your comments, guys. I'm very pleased with this cam and if
you can get past how much it weighs (I can) it seems to deliver the goods.
The lenses, all four in the line seem to be great performers. I've seen images
made with all of them that makes me believe they took great
care in uniform quality. The lenses are easily affordable with the 58mm
wide being the most expensive.
Thanks again.
Bill
Last edited by Katastrofo on Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Here's a couple more from the truck show, the shots on the Portra 160
are just too damaged to work with:
Had a lighting problem in some of these, late afternoon was less than
ideal if the truck is pointed in the wrong direction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2155
Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
Hard to believe Bill. Film always has a, well, film look. These don't have that look at all. Fantastic results.
_________________
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
What really amazes me is this is a *400* ISO film. Yeah I can make out a
little grain in the shadow areas, but this is the best 400 print film I've ever
seen. The 800 Portra is purdy good, too. Have a roll of that in 35 I'll be
trying with one of my Konica T4s.
Thanks for your comments, Ron. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2155
Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
Bill, I have used a lot of kodak gold and fuji superia in the last couple of years. What would you recommend I give a try?
_________________
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Ron, for color print film, it's Portra all the way for shots you care about.
Kodak Gold 100 and 200 is still not bad, but the colors and close-grain
of Portra just can't be beat, this side of slide. I would sing the praises of
Ektar, but have had too much problem with color shift with that film where
I don't with Portra. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
| Katastrofo wrote: |
Orio, thanks for changing the thread title, in the interest of clarity I should
have spelled it out. |
I did not change the title Bill.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
| Katastrofo wrote: |
Orio, thanks for changing the thread title, in the interest of clarity I should
have spelled it out. |
I did not change the title Bill. |
My mistake, I did an edit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 1855
Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Awesome set of images. I think that camera is the sharpest 120 shots I have seen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2155
Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
| Katastrofo wrote: |
Ron, for color print film, it's Portra all the way for shots you care about.
Kodak Gold 100 and 200 is still not bad, but the colors and close-grain
of Portra just can't be beat, this side of slide. I would sing the praises of
Ektar, but have had too much problem with color shift with that film where
I don't with Portra. |
Are you talking about the porta VC?
_________________
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Graham, thanks, this camera hasn't let me down from the first roll onward. Recommended. Now, the place where I sent some rolls thru
Walmart have let me down....
Ron, yes, Portra 160 and 400VC, 160 and 400NC films. The 800 is good,
too, I've seen enough from others to recommend it, but still haven't tried
it. The 800 does very well in low light situations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Katastrofo
Greats three pics!!!
The lens is a winner and the konica cam too.
Perhaps the best negative digitalized pics that I saw (among them, sure).
Congratrulations!! Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Rino, thanks, I've found this camera/lens to be quite a surprise.
Orio, I have trouble believing this is the equal in output to your Canon MKII, especially after seeing your mindboggling images, but I'm happy
with the scans (all done at home with the Epson 4490). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tobbsman
Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 2578
Location: Austria
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobbsman wrote:
Crystal clear images ... looks digital for my taste - I mean I would not see immideately that those are scans.
Nr.1 and the yellow truck down in the thread are my favourites.
Cheers
Tobias
_________________
Camera Pentax K10D, K20D, Super A
SMC K28 3.5, SMC K24 2.8, SMC K28/2, SMC K50/1.4,SMC A50/1.7, SMC M28/3.5, SMC A 50/1.7, SMC K135 2.5, SMC A50 1.2
SMC A35-105 3.5, SMC A70-210 4, SMC A20 2.8, SMC M28 2.8,K28/3.5 SMC A28 2.8, SMC A100 2.8 Macro, CZJ Flektogon 20 2.8 (MC), 35 2.4 (MC),S.M.C Takumar 85mm 1.8, Helios 44M-4, A.Schacht Travenar 90/2.8, C.Zeiss J. Sonnar 180/2.8
Check out my: 2012 New "Advanced Guide to Panorama Stiching" !
Check out my "Beginner's Guide to Panorama Stiching !
Visit my Asahi and Zeiss MF lens samples database ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Appreciate your comments, Tobbs, thanks.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
