Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Crazy Foveon...
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2009 8:14 pm    Post subject: Crazy Foveon... Reply with quote

... and my beloved Auto Takumar 35/2.3

Window shot, 30s exposure, f/11, ISO100:

(open in new window for full resolution)



No PS edits Smile


PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2009 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this is jaw dropping just great Shocked
nice skills you have i envy you Wink Cool
GREAT CAPTURE !!!


PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2009 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ufff ... maybe this is the best night exposures I've seen here ...

Very surreal looking scenery. There is no "life" in this shot, no cars, no people ... but the sky looks so lively. That makes it really surreal ...

congrats,
Cheers
Tobias


PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Was the sky really so "Fuchsia pink", or was it a colour shift due to the long exposure time?


PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 6:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Where is the noise? Shocked

Quality is like a slide film Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is it Sigma SD14 ?


PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 8:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you for the nice comments Smile

yalcin: Yes.

Orio: It's a result of several factors: Overexposure (I have two sets - first one which is a bit underexposed /4-12s/, but closer to optimum and second one, which is overexposed /25-30s/, but has a bit better composition. Now I see 12-20s should be optimal. I have no experience with taking these night exposures, so this one was kind of first try...). The second factor is change of the sky color - at beginning it was a bit warmer and later it got cooler, but not as much as on the picture. And the last factor (but with smaller influence) is white balance.

This one is the least exposured (25s) of the second set - still quite agreesive, but slight difference is visible:



PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2009 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow! That's pretty awesome!