View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 2:21 am Post subject: This is getting difficult |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
The new Panasonic Micro 4/3 price came out today: Press release below.
http://tinyurl.com/cddnx2
The problem is that a good used 5D is cheaper. Don’t know about you but I’m having a hard time deciding which one to get. I know that the only way to get a wide angle shot on the Panasonic is to use a Cine lens or a rangefinder lens. Not a bad way to go but expensive!
Jules |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
A micro 4/3 camera that costs more than a used 5D. Tough choice. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
If you have excellent reflex lenses. The 5d sounds the way.
The DR of that M 4/3 system can not match.
Of course that opinion comes from comparing the 5D to the original 4/3 system.
I think we can assume the same.
Again just an opinion. Lens conversion is another big knock. _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jieffe
Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Posts: 754 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jieffe wrote:
Knowing you, you must also take into account the possibility to easily remove the hot mirror |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
In fact, when the 5D Mark II will become ridiculously cheap , one can think of buying one of them and remove the mirror completely, and use it only with liveview instant E.V.I.L. ! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5044 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
I would remove the electronics totally and fit them with a flexible bellows and 5 inch monitor to make a modern small view camera. _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Orio wrote: |
....remove the mirror completely, and use it only with liveview instant E.V.I.L. ! |
I don't get you. Why do you want to remove the mirror? So that you can mount all lenses? _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
my_photography wrote: |
Orio wrote: |
....remove the mirror completely, and use it only with liveview instant E.V.I.L. ! |
I don't get you. Why do you want to remove the mirror? So that you can mount all lenses? |
Precisely!. Without a mirror, you could mount also rangefinder lenses on a 5DMkII !
Think about it... mount all those great rangefinder lenses on a 5DMkII... Leica-M... Zeiss ZM... LeicaM39... Voigtlaender... Contax lenses... Contax G lenses!
doesn't is sound fantastic?
Someone's got to realize this project ! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Precisely!. Without a mirror, you could mount also rangefinder lenses on a 5DMkII !
Think about it... mount all those great rangefinder lenses on a 5DMkII... Leica-M... Zeiss ZM... LeicaM39... Voigtlaender... Contax lenses... Contax G lenses!
doesn't is sound fantastic?
Someone's got to realize this project ! |
Wow, pure E.V.I.L
Let's see who will be the first Adam or Eve here. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Perhaps a less painful way can be to make a first tentative with an APS-C camera.
the 1000D I think has liveview and should be around 500 Euros.
So still crazy, but a bit less crazy
But more important is to find someone willing to make the adapters that are necessary:
- Leica M bayonet to EOS
- Leica M39 thread to EOS
- Contax/Kiev bayonet to EOS _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Orio wrote: |
my_photography wrote: |
Orio wrote: |
....remove the mirror completely, and use it only with liveview instant E.V.I.L. ! |
I don't get you. Why do you want to remove the mirror? So that you can mount all lenses? |
Precisely!. Without a mirror, you could mount also rangefinder lenses on a 5DMkII !
Think about it... mount all those great rangefinder lenses on a 5DMkII... Leica-M... Zeiss ZM... LeicaM39... Voigtlaender... Contax lenses... Contax G lenses!
doesn't is sound fantastic?
Someone's got to realize this project ! |
Ask Alex (HK300). I believe he has a friend who is busy modifying a 5D.
The best way would be to remove the mirror completely, and move the sensor forward. A few cm's, just to be usable with rangefinder lenses. For normal reflex lenses, you'll only need to add an extension tube. And presto _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
If you have excellent reflex lenses. The 5d sounds the way.
The DR of that M 4/3 system can not match.
Of course that opinion comes from comparing the 5D to the original 4/3 system.
I think we can assume the same.
Again just an opinion. Lens conversion is another big knock. |
Yes that's is what I'm thinking also, The FF bodies are so good with 35mm reflex lenses, I have a lot of them, the IQ if the FF bodies is obviously better than the APC sensors so I probably will go with the 5D or the 5D MkII.
Thanks
Jules |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
Jieffe wrote: |
Knowing you, you must also take into account the possibility to easily remove the hot mirror |
HA HA! Well . . actually not as my Hot mirror has been removed from the 40D and it's fine (for now). I'm going for a great visible light camera so the FF bodies are really where I think I'll go.
Jules |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OregonJim
Joined: 21 Apr 2009 Posts: 14 Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
OregonJim wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
The best way would be to remove the mirror completely, and move the sensor forward. A few cm's, just to be usable with rangefinder lenses. For normal reflex lenses, you'll only need to add an extension tube. And presto |
Why move the sensor forward? Wouldn't it be easier to engineer a mount adapter that allows the lens to be recessed into the body by the same amount? That is, if you're removing the mirror anyway... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
OregonJim wrote: |
Spotmatic wrote: |
The best way would be to remove the mirror completely, and move the sensor forward. A few cm's, just to be usable with rangefinder lenses. For normal reflex lenses, you'll only need to add an extension tube. And presto |
Why move the sensor forward? Wouldn't it be easier to engineer a mount adapter that allows the lens to be recessed into the body by the same amount? That is, if you're removing the mirror anyway... |
That sounds logical indeed, but on some/most lenses, the focus and/or diaphragm ring will be (partly) inaccessible, making your solution awkward. _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OregonJim
Joined: 21 Apr 2009 Posts: 14 Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OregonJim wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
OregonJim wrote: |
Spotmatic wrote: |
The best way would be to remove the mirror completely, and move the sensor forward. A few cm's, just to be usable with rangefinder lenses. For normal reflex lenses, you'll only need to add an extension tube. And presto |
Why move the sensor forward? Wouldn't it be easier to engineer a mount adapter that allows the lens to be recessed into the body by the same amount? That is, if you're removing the mirror anyway... |
That sounds logical indeed, but on some/most lenses, the focus and/or diaphragm ring will be (partly) inaccessible, making your solution awkward. |
Somehow I missed the fact that you were talking about rangefinder lenses - in that case, yes, it would be awkward (if not unusable). An additional glass element in the adapter would make it workable, but that kinda defeats the purpose. Oh well... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|