View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dave_t
Joined: 16 Sep 2008 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:22 pm Post subject: 135mm temporary replacement |
|
|
dave_t wrote:
first post, looks like a great forum!
Unfortunately, I come with bad news. The other day, my wonderful and loved CZJ 135/3.5 literally fell apart in my hands while I was focusing to infinity. Don't know what happened, but it's in for repairs, which will take a month. Unfortunately, I don't have anything in the 135mm range to take its place.
I'm wondering if somebody could maybe give me some suggestions as to what I could use to fill the void. I'm looking for sharpness more than anything (will also be used with a 2x teleconverter). I've considered just buying another CZJ, but I'm not sure how much I would want to have 2 once this one is repaired, but it's what I may end up doing anyways.
I'm looking for lenses in the M42 mount, thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Séamuis
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 157 Location: here & now
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Séamuis wrote:
the S-M-C (Super-Multi-Coated)Takumar 135mm 3.5 is very sharp and actually pretty easy to find like places such as ebay and can be had for about 60 USD. maybe a bit more if it has the original case and lens hood. I have this lens (I paid 100 USD for lens, case and hood) and its quite sharp even wide open, sharp as a tack stopped down. excellent Pentax build quality and butter smooth focus throw. they weren't loved as much as the 2.8's but always kept so they are plentiful in nearly mint condition. that's my suggestion. here is some examples by the lens (not mine) in the MFL forum gallery: http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/takumar/smc_takumar_135mm_f3_5/
what camera will you be using it on? _________________ Fish-Eye -- Fish-Eye-Takumar 1:11/18
WideAngle -- Super-Takumar 1:3.5/28, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3/35, Auto-Takumar 1:3.5/35, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/35
Normal -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:1.8/55, Super-Takumar 1:1.8/55, S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/55, SMC Takumar 1:1.8/55, Auto-Takumar 1:2/55
TeleType -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/85, S-M-C Takumar 1:2.8/105, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/135, Tele-Takumar 1:6.3/300
Zoom -- Super Takumar-Zoom 1:4.5/70~150
Macro -- Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, S-M-C Macro-Takumar 1:4/100, Bellows-Takumar 1:4/100
Medium Format -- S-M-C Takumar 6X7 1:2.8/90 LS
----------------------------------------
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dave_t
Joined: 16 Sep 2008 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dave_t wrote:
I will be using it on a Canon 30d as well as a Praktica L. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: Re: 135mm temporary replacement |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
dave_t wrote: |
first post, looks like a great forum!
Unfortunately, I come with bad news. The other day, my wonderful and loved CZJ 135/3.5 literally fell apart in my hands while I was focusing to infinity. Don't know what happened, but it's in for repairs, which will take a month. Unfortunately, I don't have anything in the 135mm range to take its place.
I'm wondering if somebody could maybe give me some suggestions as to what I could use to fill the void. I'm looking for sharpness more than anything (will also be used with a 2x teleconverter). I've considered just buying another CZJ, but I'm not sure how much I would want to have 2 once this one is repaired, but it's what I may end up doing anyways.
I'm looking for lenses in the M42 mount, thanks! |
Hi Dave,
Welcome to the crew. Sorry about the Jena.
I would suggest basically any Takumar 135. Amazingly sharp, lots of them around and not too expensive. I use it on my 30D also.
Jules |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
If you decide on the Pentax Takumar, go for the Super Multi Coated (S-M-C) version if you can find it, otherwise the older Super Takumar is as good. I have both and they are both equally Tak sharp. The only difference I can tell is in the coating and better resistance to flare, if you shoot direct to lightsource. Otherwise both are sweet little sharp and buttery smooth operation lens. The S-M-C tend to be a little more expensive comparatively. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
HI, DAVE
I think that you can buy a CZJ 135/3,5 but zebra version. It's cheap and you can't find other lens much similar to yours MC CZJ.
Somebody posted here saying that the zebra version is sharpest than the MC. May be, why not? You can know this with little money.
Good luck. Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
csaba369
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 172 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
csaba369 wrote:
My all time favourite lens is the zebra sonnar. Here is some pics with it:
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&m=1&p=2&a=69&af=0&b=df&ka=69&ki=1313#df
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&m=1&p=2&a=69&af=0&b=df&ka=69&ki=1315#df
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&m=1&p=2&a=69&af=9&b=df&ka=69&ki=1443#df _________________ A lot of MF lenses, Panasonic G1, EOS 300V, Zorki 4, Kiev 4, Pentacon Six etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
csaba369
Did you compare the zebra with the MC? Have pics?
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
csaba369
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 172 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
csaba369 wrote:
zebra (click on pictures):
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&m=1&p=2&a=53&af=0&b=df&ka=53&ki=1168#df
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&m=1&p=2&a=64&b=df&ka=64&ki=1203#df
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&ka=64&ki=1203&kf=3&a=64&b=df&m=1&p=2#df
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&m=1&p=2&a=53&af=9&b=df&ka=53&ki=1172#df
MC:
http://www.369.hu/369hu.php?l=hu&m=1&p=1&a=63 most of them in this categorie.
MC has better colors, less flare Zebra is sharper and better bokeh. All picture is modified in Gimp or Lightroom, sorry no origins now. _________________ A lot of MF lenses, Panasonic G1, EOS 300V, Zorki 4, Kiev 4, Pentacon Six etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Thank you, very much!!
Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Buy another Jena, if possible zebra, I am behind Csaba's opinion. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Other ways : Jupiter-37, Tamron 2,8/135 Bbar /Adaptall. I have currently 2 Jena "S" zebra under repair ....(mechanics !) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
http://forum.mflenses.com/sigmatel-135mm-f1-8-t10703.html _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
DSG wrote: |
dave_t wrote: |
first post, looks like a great forum!
I'm looking for 135mm lenses in the M42 mount, thanks! |
Welcome aboard Dave...One slightly annoying thing is this forum has a rule that you can only post images up to 900 pixels wide but apart from that its a pretty good place to hang out.
Have you considerd the Sigma-made Sigmatel/Spiratone/Sun YS 135mm f1.8?
I picked my Sigmatel Scalematic up on ebay in YS-Minolta mount (MD) but that was useless to me so simply bought an YS-M42 adapter to instantly convert it to M42 mount...Including the postage the Sigmatel cost under £60.
Despite its fast speed its not very heavy and its well made too.
Here are some unsharpened handheld samples...
@f5.6:
And a 100% crop:
@f4:
And a 100% crop:
@f4:
And a 100% crop:
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dave_t
Joined: 16 Sep 2008 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
dave_t wrote:
Thanks for the input, unfortunately a lot of those lenses aren't immediately available where I live, and I'm looking for something to hold me over (starting this evening already!).
My options for immediate gratification are as follows (unless I decide to be more patient, or if it doesn't clear up today!):
TAIR-11A 135/2.8
Zeiss 135/2.8
LUXON MC 135mm F2.8 (??????)
Takumar SMC 135/3,5
or another copy of my sonnar... the Luxon I have never heard of before, and would appreciate some input, also wondering about the Zeiss 2.8, maybe that extra stop would be nice? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Luxon an "unknown" lens 99% chance you will get a weak lens.
2.8 Sonnar has Contax or Praktica B mount.
With Contax mount slightly better than 3.5 , with Praktica B mount slightly weaker. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dave_t
Joined: 16 Sep 2008 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
dave_t wrote:
That's right, can't believe I didn't realize that when I saw it in a picture with a B mount praktica. Probably end up going with the takumar!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Takumar is a right choice, you will like it same than Sonnar I guess. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Takumar is a right choice, you will like it same than Sonnar I guess. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Séamuis
Joined: 20 Jul 2008 Posts: 157 Location: here & now
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Séamuis wrote:
you wont be disappointed going with a Takumar. some of the finest lenses ever made. _________________ Fish-Eye -- Fish-Eye-Takumar 1:11/18
WideAngle -- Super-Takumar 1:3.5/28, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3/35, Auto-Takumar 1:3.5/35, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/35
Normal -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:1.8/55, Super-Takumar 1:1.8/55, S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/55, SMC Takumar 1:1.8/55, Auto-Takumar 1:2/55
TeleType -- S-M-C Takumar 1:1.8/85, S-M-C Takumar 1:2.8/105, Super-Takumar 1:3.5/135, Tele-Takumar 1:6.3/300
Zoom -- Super Takumar-Zoom 1:4.5/70~150
Macro -- Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, S-M-C Macro-Takumar 1:4/100, Bellows-Takumar 1:4/100
Medium Format -- S-M-C Takumar 6X7 1:2.8/90 LS
----------------------------------------
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
orly_andico
Joined: 02 Jul 2008 Posts: 253 Location: Philippines
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
orly_andico wrote:
get the tair!!!
More expensive than the tak, but its got a lot of character.
I must say the tak, while mechanically good (far better than the CZJ i have...) is a humorless lens. Sharp, yes, flare resistant, yes... But the CZJ has more character.
The CZJ and tak arent that far apart, my tak is sharper than my CZJ but the color cast from the CZJ is more pleasing. So when you get the CZJ back you may feel the tak is redundant. Or you'll be so pleased with the tak's mechanical solidity you wont use the CZJ anymore...
Better be different and get the tair i want one... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dave_t
Joined: 16 Sep 2008 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dave_t wrote:
The Tair is cheaper than the Tak where I live, but then again, the prices are all messed up here... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
dave_t wrote: |
The Tair is cheaper than the Tak where I live, but then again, the prices are all messed up here... |
where do you live Dave?
I am living on ebay _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
orly_andico
You speak very well of the Tair, but you have a takumar and a CZJ.
Dave
CZJ 3,5 zebra has a mechanism that hasn't the takumar, when you focus close the blades open to continue with the same F/.
It's a very smart system, and MC lost this.
I vote for CZJ, zebra if you want it cheaper, MC if you prefer the wanderfull colors of the last Zeiss.
Regards, Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I have all of above lenses my favorite #1 also CZJ Zebra #2 is Tair, #3 is Takumar _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|