View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 2050 Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:18 pm Post subject: Ugliest Camera Ever Sold? |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
I don't think I have ever seen a camera like this where every button and knob seems like an afterthought? Anyone else share that opinion - and what camera would you vote for?
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Huuh this is ugly ... _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bob955i
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
I suspect the "built in flash" is actually the selenium meter window.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Puplet
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Puplet wrote:
I rather like it - the camera of mad engineers! Like this one:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bob955i
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
A Jaeger Le Coultre compass camera no less. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 2155 Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
I kind of like things that look so bad that a hog wouldn't eat it. Then drag it out where people are bragging about their high dollar crap and start telling how nice it is. _________________ Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 2050 Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:19 pm Post subject: Wrist camera |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
Why does the very complex camera remind me of A Tessina? I traded one of those in the 1960's or very early '70's for a Petri SLR and we both thought the other had probably done well! _________________ Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
The cam Puplet posted is kind of cool. The Samoca is one ugly eyesore
of a camera--looks like the engineers got drunk on a 3-day weekend and
decided to build a camera on Tuesday. LOL
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Oh, I don't know. The Argus "brick" is worse (I have two of them). It is a clumsier shape.
That, or the Kodak 35 rangefinder version (the other one though is rather elegant - I have one of each). _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hacksawbob
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1293 Location: LANCS UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
hacksawbob wrote:
That Argus takes the buiscuit, The other two although a nightmare to use I dont mind them so much I am a sucker for chrome! The Yashica Samurai I think needs to be up there somewhere plastic crap of the highest order.
_________________ LENS LIST |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
Hmm. someone named O***n is leading. Now, who might that be!? _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
(photo at www.lpfoto.se)
Now thats a contender. Homebuilt I suppose, sold on an auction in sweden. _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
The Polaroid Land camera I used to have at work takes some beating for being the ugliest (and clumsiest) camera I ever saw. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
zewrak wrote: |
(photo at www.lpfoto.se)
Now thats a contender. Homebuilt I suppose, sold on an auction in sweden. |
No, this is not homebuild. Those are first versions of Zenit Fotosaniper. _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
Flor27 wrote: |
zewrak wrote: |
(photo at www.lpfoto.se)
Now thats a contender. Homebuilt I suppose, sold on an auction in sweden. |
No, this is not homebuild. Those are first versions of Zenit Fotosaniper. |
Scary. _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
What about this one ?
I've see one last week in Bièvres photo camera fair
Edit : about the earlier Fotosnaiper : http://www.xs4all.nl/~tomtiger/fs-2/fs-2.html _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
hehe I wonder if they would let you on a plane with that one. I cant really see any benefit to make a camera that looks like a handgun really. Rifles, ok. But a handgun? :p _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bob
Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 675 Location: Wentzville, Mo.
Expire: 2011-12-08
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob wrote:
In these days would you really carry the sniper around?? _________________ Bob
"In terms of addiction, there is nothing more powerful than men's toys."
Sammy Davis Jr. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I can see a reason to use that photo-pistol - silent firearms training.
I think though that particular one looks like it was made as a novelty.
Gun-cameras were also used for air-combat training, among other things. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nemesis101
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 2050 Location: Oregon USA
Expire: 2015-01-22
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: Photosniper et al |
|
|
nemesis101 wrote:
The Samurai was a good beautiful camera inj digital form , fit the hand so well it was scary - a triumph of form AND function!
The fotosniper should be dedicated to those folks at the department of homeland insecurity - it's old, ugly, and whilst it probably worked, there were so many better things to do! lol So, I give you The DHS Long Range anti terrorism device.. with a name like that the DHS would snap them up at thousands of bucks a time!
Come on, put yours up on e-bay and see? _________________ Lenses and cameras:
Amateurs worry about equipment
Pros worry about money,
Masters worry about light. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Nothing beats that original post - what a terrible piece of trash, it has absolutely no compensating virtues.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6557 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
patrickh wrote: |
Nothing beats that original post - what a terrible piece of trash, it has absolutely no compensating virtues.
patrickh |
Amazingly, it went for $78 Only goes to show what people will pay for trash. If I didn't know better, I'd suspect it was made in a basement by mad uncle Ernie. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop Norway
http://www.fomafoto.com/
Webshop Czech
https://fomaobchod.cz/inshop/scripts/shop.aspx?action=DoChangeLanguage&LangID=4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|