View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
eagle_ wrote: |
Hi,
just got a very similar lens, physically it seems the same, there are slight differences. Pics:
The first obvious difference is that it is a Petri bayonet mount... I'm thinking of altering a M42-EOS adapter to fit this in my camera. Any ohter ideas?
It's a Hanimex, and there's a not so obvious difference: the scale in meters and feet is switched! Do you think that this is also a Komine made lens? |
Welcome eagle. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Hi Eagle,
Nice looking lens !
The good news is that that s a T-mount, I'm almost certain. You should be able to just unscrew that and put in a T-mount for your DSLR.
I don't know if its a Komine, it could be. I am not sure about the size of the objective vs the lens barrel, yours seems to flare out to a larger size than mine, but I'll have to check that.
There were several other makers of 180/3.5 presets like this. Vivitar sold one from an unknown maker (I have that) but its rather different. Others were Kyoei (I have one) and Tamron (I have that too). Both are also different.
Tokina had one, which seems to be quite rare as I've never seen it. Yours may be one, Hanimex did sell the common Tokinas (as well as a lot of others). Cosina also had one, never seen that either. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eagle_
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eagle_ wrote:
sichko wrote: |
Welcome eagle. |
Thanks! Why aren't my photos showing?
As for the mount, i'll try to remove it. Maybe i'm lucky...
This lens takes 62mm filters. I can size it and post it's measures. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
horvlas
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 202 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
horvlas wrote:
WOW. What a sharpness! It's sharper than takumar! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eagle_
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
eagle_ wrote:
Luis, You were right! It is an adapter, the lens has a screw mount that i can't identify (it's not M42), maybe it's T-mount has you said. I'll measure it and find an adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Hi Eagle,
T-thread is 42mm but the thread pitch is .75mm instead of 1mm with regular M42. And of course the back-focus without an adapter is much longer than with M42.
You should be able to measure it, the outside diameter of the male thread should be 42mm (or close to it).
I am certain this is a t-mount. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eagle_
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
eagle_ wrote:
Hi,
i measured it today and it's about 46mm. I didn't take pics yet. Is this any known mount? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Are you measuring the thread on the lens ? That should be 42mm or very close.
Or are you measuring the inner ring of the T-mount ? That can be left on if the T-mount is removed improperly, and it could be 46mm, although there is no standard for that, T-mount makers make their inner ring design as they like.
The T-mount comes in two parts - the inner ring with 42x.75 female thread and the knurled outer ring with the lens-mount. They are held together with three set-screws. But the way to remove the T-mount is just to unscrew the whole thing from the lens. The set-screws are just there to adjust the T-mount so the lens alignment is correct - the top is on the top. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eagle_
Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eagle_ wrote:
Hi,
i'm not sure i understood.
I saw that it has an inner "adapter" - a 42x0,75 male ring that was completelly attached. I unscrewed it a bit, it looked like this:
And here it is off the lens:
So the lens itself has a 42x0,75 female thread. This means that the T-mount->EOS adapter has a male thread?
Can you show some pictures of yours and the adapter you use? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
You have an odd one ! Thats not a T-mount if the outside male thread is 46mm.
The outside male thread on the lens should be 42mmx0.75
I suspect you have a dedicated lens mount then, and things won't be so simple. You may be able to adapt a T-mount to fit by removing the inner ring and fitting it on with the set-screws (I do that a lot).
There may be issues with back focus, as the adapter distance won't be standard. The lens will either overshoot or come short of infinity. And it won't be as strong and stable a mount.
I will take pictures of a typical T-mount lens and adapter and post them. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
This is a typical T-mount lens (Lentar 135/3.5 preset) and a standard T-mount -
The lens has 42mmx.75 Male thread and the mount has a female threaded inner ring, held on the mount by three setscrews. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tkbslc
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Posts: 194 Location: Utah, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:44 am Post subject: Just picked up one of these, too! |
|
|
tkbslc wrote:
Sorry to revive an old thread, but I just found one of theses lenses too. I found a poorly worded auction offering this 180mm f3.5 along with a Soligor 200mm f3.5 as well. Got them both for the starting price of 99 cents (+$16 shipping!) Unfortunately I do not have an SLR with me for a few days to test it out, but it looks very promising from the samples in this thread. My biggest surprise was the FIFTEEN aperture blades. I also like the smooth continuous preset aperture motion. It is like I have infinite aperture stops.
Sorry for the bad pics, but as I said, I don't have my SLR with me today.
Look at all those blades!
The Soligor 200 3.5 seems pretty ordinary and looks brand new.
Edit: ODD my pictures work in a preview, but not in the final post
?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6557 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:04 am Post subject: Re: Just picked up one of these, too! |
|
|
Farside wrote:
tkbslc wrote: |
Sorry to revive an old thread, but I just found one of theses lenses too. I found a poorly worded auction offering this 180mm f3.5 along with a Soligor 200mm f3.5 as well. Got them both for the starting price of 99 cents (+$16 shipping!) Unfortunately I do not have an SLR with me for a few days to test it out, but it looks very promising from the samples in this thread. My biggest surprise was the FIFTEEN aperture blades. I also like the smooth continuous preset aperture motion. It is like I have infinite aperture stops.
Sorry for the bad pics, but as I said, I don't have my SLR with me today.
Look at all those blades!
The Soligor 200 3.5 seems pretty ordinary and looks brand new.
Edit: ODD my pictures work in a preview, but not in the final post
?? |
It's an anti-spam measure - first time posters can't post pics. You'll be ok now. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop Norway
http://www.fomafoto.com/
Webshop Czech
https://fomaobchod.cz/inshop/scripts/shop.aspx?action=DoChangeLanguage&LangID=4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aykman
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:18 am Post subject: I have to correct some informations here!!! |
|
|
Aykman wrote:
this message is outdated and deleted!
Last edited by Aykman on Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tkbslc
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Posts: 194 Location: Utah, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:35 pm Post subject: Re: I have to correct some informations here!!! |
|
|
tkbslc wrote:
Aykman wrote: |
Hi,
I dont know it looks not like komine because I had two 200mm from Komine with Vivitar and Panagor label....they looked different.
|
Sorry if my post was confusing. Both pictures are of the 180mm Soligor. My 200mm looks like a plain jane Tokina or Tamron, so I did not post images of it. I thought the 180mm was interesting because of all the aperture blades. It seems like all the other mega-blade lenses have a cult following (Tair, "bokeh-monster" pentacon 135, etc. ) and I had never heard of this one before. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Hi tkbslc,
I am guessing its a Komine because I have seen a Kominar (house trademark of Komine brand, actual company was Nittoh Kogaku, still in existence) that was very very similar in design details. Many makers products were sold under the Soligor brand, even the early Tamron line.
"Soligor" was in the beginning a brand name used by Allied Impex Co., a US photo products distributor in New York, founded by a group of German Jewish refugees. I believe they began their company in the 1940's. In the 1950's they became large-scale importers of Japanese made lenses, and they purchased the Japanese Miranda camera company. By the 1960's Allied Impex, using the Soligor brand, was the biggest international distributor of Japanese lenses. Vivitar (a brand of Ponder&Best, another photo distributior) followed them into the lens business later, and took their market.
Allied Impex went bankrupt in the late 1970's, and the Soligor brand seems to have been picked up by their European branch in Germany, which reorganized themselves under the Soligor name.
This Soligor lens is from the 1960's, from an earlier generation than the Vivitar and Panagor-branded auto lenses you are referring to, which are from 5-15 years later. The design is typical of 1960's presets. They are all rip-offs of old German designs of course. Sometimes they are excellent rip-offs though, like this one. There are Komine lenses even in the 1970's that were excellent in all respects. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
see my Tele-Kominar 135mm f3.5 for comparison:
_________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisBee
Joined: 30 Jan 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisBee wrote:
Hi there
Sorry for again warming up this threat.
I took over an old Leica III and a couple of corresponding lenses, including a "dissimilar" Soligor 180 mm 1:3.5. And of course, I am now curious about the quality of this Soligor. Comparing with the pictures from kuuan, my Soligor looks very similar, see
(the lens is shown with its mount to the Leica camera [I dont know whats wrong but when publishing, I can't see my two pictures]). And that would be good news, following the discussion.
kuuan wrote: |
just received the Soligor 180mm f3.5
note: this is not the Komine of the OP luisalegria!
I wonder who made this one, it's serial number is M 193404
...
|
However, there are two little differences: It looks like the scale on kuuan's pictures goes like "2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0", while mine is "2.3 2.5 3", and so on. And the serial number of my Soligor is 86420968, while the one from kuuan start with an M. I've somewhere read that the first two numbers of the serial number are a hint to the manifacturer of the Soligor lens...
Would you assume my Soligor is of the same quality than the Soligor from kuuan? And does anyone in the meantime has an idea who the manifacturer could be?
Many thanks in advance for your reply.
Best regards
Chris
(from Switzerland)
PS: I know that mounting a 180 lens to an old Leica is not of everyone's flavor, but that's another story
Last edited by ChrisBee on Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:40 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
ChrisBee wrote: |
Hi there
Sorry for again warming up this threat.
I took over an old Leica III and a couple of corresponding lenses, including a "dissimilar" Soligor 180 mm 1:3.5. And of course, I am now curious about the quality of this Soligor. Comparing with the pictures from kuuan, my Soligor looks very similar, see
picture 1
picture 2
(the lens is shown with its mount to the Leica camera). And that would be good news, following the discussion.
kuuan wrote: |
just received the Soligor 180mm f3.5
note: this is not the Komine of the OP luisalegria!
I wonder who made this one, it's serial number is M 193404
...
|
However, there are two little differences: It looks like the scale on kuuan's pictures goes like "2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0", while mine is "2.3 2.5 3", and so on. And the serial number of my Soligor is 86420968, while the one from kuuan start with an M. I've somewhere read that the first two numbers of the serial number are a hint to the manifacturer of the Soligor lens...
Would you assume my Soligor is of the same quality than the Soligor from kuuan? And does anyone in the meantime has an idea who the manifacturer could be?
Many thanks in advance for your reply.
Best regards
Chris
(from Switzerland)
PS: I know that mounting a 180 lens to an old Leica is not of everyone's flavor, but that's another story
picture 1
picture 2 |
_________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
ChrisBee wrote: |
Hi there
Sorry for again warming up this threat.
I took over an old Leica III and a couple of corresponding lenses, including a "dissimilar" Soligor 180 mm 1:3.5. And of course, I am now curious about the quality of this Soligor. Comparing with the pictures from kuuan, my Soligor looks very similar, see
(the lens is shown with its mount to the Leica camera [I dont know whats wrong but when publishing, I can't see my two pictures]). And that would be good news, following the discussion.
kuuan wrote: |
just received the Soligor 180mm f3.5
note: this is not the Komine of the OP luisalegria!
I wonder who made this one, it's serial number is M 193404
...
|
However, there are two little differences: It looks like the scale on kuuan's pictures goes like "2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0", while mine is "2.3 2.5 3", and so on. And the serial number of my Soligor is 86420968, while the one from kuuan start with an M. I've somewhere read that the first two numbers of the serial number are a hint to the manifacturer of the Soligor lens...
Would you assume my Soligor is of the same quality than the Soligor from kuuan? And does anyone in the meantime has an idea who the manifacturer could be?
Many thanks in advance for your reply.
Best regards
Chris
(from Switzerland)
PS: I know that mounting a 180 lens to an old Leica is not of everyone's flavor, but that's another story |
Hi Chris,
welcome to the forum.
Your pictures not showing up / not being clickable is an anti spam measure hitting a first time poster. estudleon made them viewable in his response, I believe next time posting this problem will be gone.
from what I see it does look very similar to mine, the focus ring of mine got a sliver line. I would assume that it is the same lens optically, as to what the differences you make out 'could' mean I do not have any idea.
best try it out and show us! and on 35mm film , my samples are APS-C _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisBee
Joined: 30 Jan 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisBee wrote:
kuuan wrote: |
...
Hi Chris,
welcome to the forum.
Your pictures not showing up / not being clickable is an anti spam measure hitting a first time poster. estudleon made them viewable in his response, I believe next time posting this problem will be gone.
from what I see it does look very similar to mine, the focus ring of mine got a sliver line. I would assume that it is the same lens optically, as to what the differences you make out 'could' mean I do not have any idea.
best try it out and show us! and on 35mm film , my samples are APS-C |
Hi Andreas
many thanks for your reply, and for your explanation regarding the non visibility of my pictures - makes sense.
I think I'll really give it a try and take some test pictures to find out about the quality ...
Best regards
Chris |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerbermiester
Joined: 27 Nov 2011 Posts: 4 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:01 pm Post subject: Just ad my 2 cents on ID |
|
|
Gerbermiester wrote:
Hello all,
I just picked up a Hanimex 180mm f3.5 Serial number serial no. H50905. It displays all the properties of the other Hanimex lenses displayed on the site.
I'd just like to ad that when I purchased this lens, it came with an Exacta KE mount adapter. This adapter had a plastic rear cap which reads 'Tokyo Kogaku Japan'. So, there you have it. Unless this lens somehow managed to end up with a Japanese made KE mount cap from another lens, it looks like it was made in the Tokyo Kogaku plant.
As an added note, I adapted the Hanimex lens to Pentax K mount. It was a destructive process mind you. After playing around with it hand held onto an old Pentax MG body I discovered that, pressed up right onto the body of the camera, the lens would focus past infinity. Minimum focus distance was ~4 meters. Awesome, eh? I then proceeded to commit MF lens heresy by JB welding the lens to the outside of a M42-Pentax K adapter. The result: a functional K mount Hanimex 180mm f3.5 lens that will focus to infinity... albeit one that will forever be Pentax K mount.
I'll post pics by this time next week. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 750 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
Tokyo Kogaku was the maker of Topcon brand cameras. Their "serious" cameras used a modified version of the Kine Exakta mount. Topcon rear caps will fit Exakta mount lenses. Can't tell without a photo but your lens was most likely made by Tokina or Nittoh (Komine). _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerbermiester
Joined: 27 Nov 2011 Posts: 4 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:33 am Post subject: Komura? Topcon? Uniadptor???? |
|
|
Gerbermiester wrote:
Hmmm, Komura came up with something called a unidapter way back when which I believe was similar in concept to T mount. I've read that there was a threaded ring that could be adapted to fit other camera mounts. This might be barking up the wrong tree, but the adaptable 46mm diameter threaded rear mount on my hanimex 180mm f3.5 has made me curious.
It would make sense for this lens to be a Topcon, being that it came with a KE adapter and was made (probably) by Tokyo Kogaku. But Komura also produced lenses in KE mount and are a known 'rebrander'.
Does anyone know the rear diameter of a unidaptor mount would be? I've done some googling, but come up dry. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerbermiester
Joined: 27 Nov 2011 Posts: 4 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:25 am Post subject: Pics as Promised |
|
|
Gerbermiester wrote:
As promised, here are the pics of the Hanimex 180mm f3.5 Lens.
You can see that I've JB welded a pentax K mount to the rear end of this lens.
As I stated before, it will reach infinity, and a little past.
After taking this lens out for a shoot, I'm really impressed with the sharpness at f3.5. The lens does suffer from a little bit of Red CA, but nothing PP can't fix. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|