View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11062 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
kds315* wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
Klaus, nice lens!
But I think Visualopsins beat all of us |
ONLY full ownership counts |
Agreed. Or as a Chinese citizen I own a tiny share of this 500 meters radio telescope soon to be finished, if these can be called a lens. At the moment, an American's 300 meters one is still the world's number one.
[pic] |
Sorry. I only "show off", as suggested by subject line. I didn't know there is a competition or contest here. Afaik, competition rules are usually specified before beginning....
Why is everything about competition? What happened to spirit of sharing? Wow did I ever make a mistake to think this is about sharing? _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Deep
Joined: 25 Oct 2008 Posts: 323 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Deep wrote:
I gotta say, this is fascinating discovering this world of impressively-specced Chinese lenses. I think in the West--especially America--we're quick to associate Chinese manufacturing with loose tolerances and poor quality, because that's what we've chosen to import. _________________ Rocket Launch Photography
Olympus: 24/2.8 MC, 28/3.5, 28/2.8 MC, 35/2.8, 50/3.5, 50/1.8 MC, 50/1.4 MC, 35-70/3.6, 75-150/4
Nikon: C 24/2.8, AI-S 28/2.8, K 35/2, K 35/2.8, F 55/3.5, C 55/1.2, AI 85/2, 105/2.5 (5/3), 105/2.5 (5/4), F 135/2.8, F 200/4, No. 5T
Pentax: 28/3.5, 35/3.5, 50/1.4 (8/6), 50/1.4 (7/6), M 50/1.4, SMC 55/1.8, 105/2.8, SMC 135/3.5, 150/4
Tamron: SP 17/3.5 151B, 28/2.5, 135/2.8 T-135, SP 300/2.8 60B, SP 35-80/2.8-3.8 01A, 80-210/3.8-4 103A, SP 1.4x TC 140F, SP 2x TC 01F
Vivitar: 24/2 (Kino), 28/2 (Kino), 50/1.4 (Cosina), S1 90/2.5 (Tokina), S1 28-80/2.8-3.5 (Kino), 70-150/3.8 (Kino), S1 70-210/3.5 (Kino), 2x Macro TC
Etc: Yashica 3.5cm/2.8, Fujinon 50/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.4, Tomioka Yashinon 55/1.2, Mamiya/Sekor 55/1.7, Sigma 90/2.8
That's a lot of 50s. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I would love to find one of those rare old beauties. The missile tracking platforms usually had an array of optics on them. I have a surplus 500mm f/5.6 that, near as I've been able to determine, was used by the US Navy in a tracking capacity. It's a Century Precision Optics Tele Athenar II, which was also available for civilian purchase, but the civilian model is painted in a crinkle black finish, whereas mine is painted in white enamel, plus it had some stenciled lettering on its side, which I managed to remove using acetone. At any rate, this lens is a mil-spec version and, because of this, I've always assumed that its optical performance was superior.
I bought it at a swap meet for $30 about 25 years ago. The purchase included an anvil flight case, but no caps or tripod mount. I lived in Southern California back then, so I decided to pay Century a visit, since they were located in North Hollywood. Glad I did. I bought a tripod mount and a slip-on front cap for it. Unfortunately, the folks I showed the lens to were not able to tell me anything about its history. Some time later, I had the occasion to meet a gentleman who was the former president of CPO, and I asked him about the lens. His description was brief, but to the point. He described it as a "well-corrected achromatic doublet" -- and that's what it is. Its optic is a cemented doublet, plus the tube has an optical flat at the front and the rear.
I've google for pics on the subject of missile tracking, and found a few photos of machines that had optics that looked a lot like mine.
Note the long lens on the bottom of this array:
And the lens built into the side of this array, probably used as a finder scope for that giant mirror:
If you've seen any of my photos of the moon posted here, chances are they were taken with this CPO 500. An oldie, but still a great lens. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
danfromm
Joined: 04 Sep 2011 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
danfromm wrote:
CZJ Goerz Dagor 45/9, anyone? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Many thanks Michael for a very interesting story. I think I bought my missile tracking lens about 10 years ago from a guy who was an insider of the missle industry. IIRC, I paid 1,000 yuan RMB, and I think it was a great deal. A Canon FD 1.4/50 cost 800+yuan then. But I never saw another one for sale since then. Some foreign lenses of similar design were offered though. I am impressed of its performance as I can read some letters and numbers of 1cm size on a window frame about 300 meters away! I think some company should make such lenses useable with a proper tripod and some gears for wild life photographers, but I doubt if the price for new lenses could be so cheap. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
kievuser wrote: |
kds315* wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
Klaus, nice lens!
But I think Visualopsins beat all of us |
ONLY full ownership counts |
Agreed. Or as a Chinese citizen I own a tiny share of this 500 meters radio telescope soon to be finished, if these can be called a lens. At the moment, an American's 300 meters one is still the world's number one.
[pic] |
Sorry. I only "show off", as suggested by subject line. I didn't know there is a competition or contest here. Afaik, competition rules are usually specified before beginning....
Why is everything about competition? What happened to spirit of sharing? Wow did I ever make a mistake to think this is about sharing? |
I started this thread in the spirit of sharing as I think those obscure Chinese products are almost unknown to the people not living in those years, and in China.
I can not speak for Klaus, But I think he was just teasing and I was certainly not serious. Pls don't take offense. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Mike Deep wrote: |
I gotta say, this is fascinating discovering this world of impressively-specced Chinese lenses. I think in the West--especially America--we're quick to associate Chinese manufacturing with loose tolerances and poor quality, because that's what we've chosen to import. |
Thanks for the kind words and interest in those old Chinese lenses. Unfortunately most of these state-owned factories were sold to private people, many were previous plant managers of the factory, and then they stopped making these products and produced something they thought lucrative. Then they let those old engineers and wokers go home with minimum compensation. IMO, they were thiefs! You most probably imported poor quality products from those new thief capitalists. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
I found an image of the filters specially made for the military mirror lens. They seem to be of very high quality.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A large format 21cm F4.5 lens made by Beijing Nr.608 factory. It is a five elements three group design that is quite rare among Chinese large format lenses. It is a specially made lens for portrait with a wide open resolving power of no less than 250 lp/mm but low contrast, and stopped down to F11 or smaller, it becoms a high contrast lens suitable for landscapes. The lens is heavy with many brass parts, and they were made in late 1970's.It covers 130mmx180mm negtive. The metal parts finish is of Leica lens like. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A fine reduction lens (精缩) 1/5x e line 50mm F2 made in 1979 in Fujian province. I have no information for other specifications. I think it could be reversed mounted for macro pictures.The coating also has a blue colour, and lens elements could be of special material.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
I just stumbled across a thread for that Seagull 500mm F5 mirror lens with some information and images shot with this lens. It says that about 1000 such lenses were made, and the current selling price is about RMB 1,000 only.
http://www.soupis.com/thread-138620-1-2.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11062 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
visualopsins wrote: |
kievuser wrote: |
kds315* wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
Klaus, nice lens!
But I think Visualopsins beat all of us |
ONLY full ownership counts |
Agreed. Or as a Chinese citizen I own a tiny share of this 500 meters radio telescope soon to be finished, if these can be called a lens. At the moment, an American's 300 meters one is still the world's number one.
[pic] |
Sorry. I only "show off", as suggested by subject line. I didn't know there is a competition or contest here. Afaik, competition rules are usually specified before beginning....
Why is everything about competition? What happened to spirit of sharing? Wow did I ever make a mistake to think this is about sharing? |
I started this thread in the spirit of sharing as I think those obscure Chinese products are almost unknown to the people not living in those years, and in China.
I can not speak for Klaus, But I think he was just teasing and I was certainly not serious. Pls don't take offense. |
No offense taken!
Thank you for the great thread!
Thanks to everybody for sharing the seldom seen together in one place!!!
My Hubble post was silly.
Of course Klaus gets award "Rarest in Show".
However, the lenses made by China and Russia and Japan and Germany cannot be compared in any useful way, really. Need more awards!
Radio telescope 'lens' antenna arrays can also be used to project focused waves of energy, such as microwaves. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Here is a rarely seen 2x teleconverter for Great Wall 120 SLR with a focusing thread so that some m39 mount enlarging lenses could be used on that camera. Otherwise, you can only use the 90/3.5 normal lens sold with the camera.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Another high quality reduction lens for chip making. It is not mine. It was made in 1969 in Shanghai so it has a (cultural) revolutionary brand name of "Red Flag", and with Mao's quote on the instruction paper. It has a resolving power of 400lp/mm in central area. I saw a set of two packed in a nice wooden case offered at last camera fair in Beijing for a very high price. The price was a bit too high,so I let it go.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Now a less exotic Chinese lens, but still sought after among Pearl River lenses. I don't collect those, but I heard this 105/2.5 lens was awarded some prize and now demanded RMB 1,000+ to a collector. So I decided to keep an example for my collection. It is said that those Zhujiang lenses were copies of Nikon ones.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
I am not sure if these C mount 16mm format zoom lenses are copies of something. This Dalian made zoom lens was eletric motor operated, but I removed those motors. It could be mounted on the Red Flag S-16mm spring driven movie camera. I checked the image with a high quality microscope eyepiece, and the image is crisp. The mechanical parts left room for improvement though.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Here is a site for old Chinese lenses and cameras. I saw some are rare prototypes. Many images are lost.
http://www.chinesecamera.org/lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
Astro-Berlin 640mm f/4.5 C, the only one built (and probably the last lens produced before Astro Gesellschaft m.b.H closed down):
Astro-Berlin APO-Telastan C 600mm f/5.6, I only know of another surviving one; have no clue how many were produced but I'd recon a low two-digit figure (max.):
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TeemÅ
Joined: 07 Apr 2016 Posts: 586 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
TeemÅ wrote:
SVP have you tried astrophotography with those? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
TeemÅ wrote: |
SVP have you tried astrophotography with those? |
No, not with the particular ones. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TeemÅ
Joined: 07 Apr 2016 Posts: 586 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
TeemÅ wrote:
SVP wrote: |
TeemÅ wrote: |
SVP have you tried astrophotography with those? |
No, not with the particular ones. |
Ah, they should get close to the Moon at least. Would be nice to see the APO performance. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
I saw one of these a few years ago with the same design in a store, but IIRC, it was a bigger brother of yours. It was about 2 meter long. Ialso saw a Nikon 6mm fisheye at the same place. I could have bought that Nikon fisheye for a good price compared to what these cost today. Rare lenses could be an investment like rare precision cameras.
Thanks for sharing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
I will post some links for some exotic Chinese lenses in use. Here is a lens removed from a J-7 fighter plane. I will keep an eye for this. It seems like a very sharp lens.
http://www.soupis.com/thread-138667-1-1.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
An image of a Great Wall brand lens by Nr,608 factory, a zoom 18-180mm F3.2 for 35mm movie camera. It is so rare that even the image is rarely seen. It cost 50,000 yuan RMB when new. A Leica M3, or a Contax IIA was only 2-3000 yuan then. I have never seen this one in person.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A rarely seen 58mm F2 lens from my collection. It is different from those Biotar copy 58mm F2 normal lenses. It has 10 aperture blades instead of 6, and it has a M45 screw mount. It was made for a special movie camera that take a frame at long intervals. The lens was made in 1974.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|