View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2016 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
You may have seen this uncommon camera and lens on flea-bay already. But they are rare in this condition these days.
It is a rare early version of Shanghai 58-2 rangefinder camera made in late 1950's. The lens is not as sharp as an Industar-50.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5044 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2016 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
I don't have any very rare lenses but this lens/body combination is unique (statistically, I figure?)
_________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RubberFlubber
Joined: 09 Oct 2015 Posts: 148 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2016 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RubberFlubber wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
Thanks for sharing. The Cooke lens looks quite old and exotic. It must be a rare one. I also have a couple of RTH Cooke lenes that I don't see very often. I will take images of them and post on this thread later.
Many people mentioned Luis. Sorry for my ignorance. Is he an authority in rare lenses? |
Thanks! As for Luis, I'm not entirely sure but I believe he's very knowledgeable about lenses in general and rare lenses. _________________ Digital camera I use: Pentax K-3, Fujifilm X-E1
Film cameras I own (and use when I can afford film, but still haven't developed any rolls): Braun Nurnberg Paxette Panto (Electromatic), Konica Autoreflex T, Canon AE-1 Program, Pentax Super Program, Minolta Hi-Matic 7s, Mamiya/Sekor 500tl, and Agfa Isolette L |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Deep
Joined: 25 Oct 2008 Posts: 323 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2016 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Deep wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
Mike Deep wrote: |
About as rare as anything in my cabinet gets. Production number depends on how many name rings you want to rope into the count.
I think Luis said this was rare? That was enough to prevent me from sacrificing it to a rocket launch.
|
Thanks Mike Deep! I have no idea how rare they are, Are they rangefinder lenses? I see there is a Zuiko 75-150/4 zoom in your lens list. I have a silver nosed early one, and I am very happy with its performance although it cost me only US$ 30. |
9,000 copies of the 55mm were produced, according to tomioka.de. Luis would have to fill us in on the other. Both are M42 lenses. _________________ Rocket Launch Photography
Olympus: 24/2.8 MC, 28/3.5, 28/2.8 MC, 35/2.8, 50/3.5, 50/1.8 MC, 50/1.4 MC, 35-70/3.6, 75-150/4
Nikon: C 24/2.8, AI-S 28/2.8, K 35/2, K 35/2.8, F 55/3.5, C 55/1.2, AI 85/2, 105/2.5 (5/3), 105/2.5 (5/4), F 135/2.8, F 200/4, No. 5T
Pentax: 28/3.5, 35/3.5, 50/1.4 (8/6), 50/1.4 (7/6), M 50/1.4, SMC 55/1.8, 105/2.8, SMC 135/3.5, 150/4
Tamron: SP 17/3.5 151B, 28/2.5, 135/2.8 T-135, SP 300/2.8 60B, SP 35-80/2.8-3.8 01A, 80-210/3.8-4 103A, SP 1.4x TC 140F, SP 2x TC 01F
Vivitar: 24/2 (Kino), 28/2 (Kino), 50/1.4 (Cosina), S1 90/2.5 (Tokina), S1 28-80/2.8-3.5 (Kino), 70-150/3.8 (Kino), S1 70-210/3.5 (Kino), 2x Macro TC
Etc: Yashica 3.5cm/2.8, Fujinon 50/1.4, Yashica ML 50/1.4, Tomioka Yashinon 55/1.2, Mamiya/Sekor 55/1.7, Sigma 90/2.8
That's a lot of 50s. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
RubberFlubber wrote: |
kievuser wrote: |
Thanks for sharing. The Cooke lens looks quite old and exotic. It must be a rare one. I also have a couple of RTH Cooke lenes that I don't see very often. I will take images of them and post on this thread later.
Many people mentioned Luis. Sorry for my ignorance. Is he an authority in rare lenses? |
Thanks! As for Luis, I'm not entirely sure but I believe he's very knowledgeable about lenses in general and rare lenses. |
Here is an image of a Rank taylor Hobson lens from my lens collection. It has many aperture blades and it can close down to F16 only. I don't think ever seen another one over the years.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I don't think I own any really rare lenses anymore. But I have owned a few that I might as well go ahead and mention. Most of these were acquisitions when I was a camera dealer.
I found a photo of this one on the net, so I'll share it here. It is a Killfit 300mm prototype with a built-in reflex housing. Mine looked just like this one. There's a lever on the other side to flip up the mirror out of the way.
For over 10 years I owned a copy of the Vivitar Professional 135mm f/1.5. Huge and very soft. It was so soft, I rarely used it. Sold it to a Japanese collector several years ago for a fraction of what they're selling for now.
I even owned one of the legendary Canon 50mm f/0.95 optics for the 7s rangefinder. Back then it was little more than a curiosity and wasn't worth much. I think I sold it for about $200.
Probably the most uncommon lens I currently own -- not really rare, but not particularly common -- is my Canon 85mm f/1.2 SSC Aspherical. What an incredible lens it is.
Another uncommon Canon I own is the FL 85-300mm f/5 2-ring zoom. This thing is the size of a bazooka. Very well built and image quality is surprisingly good.
Another lens that I currently own that I consider to be uncommon at least is a Sigma 600mm f/8 mirror in EOS mount. The lens isn't rare at all, but those in EOS mount are quite uncommon.
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anktonio
Joined: 20 Oct 2012 Posts: 219 Location: Spain
Expire: 2017-02-22
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
anktonio wrote:
Thank you all, it is a pleasure to see these lenses!
cooltouch wrote: |
I even owned one of the legendary Canon 50mm f/0.95 optics for the 7s rangefinder. Back then it was little more than a curiosity and wasn't worth much. I think I sold it for about $200.
|
I am fascinated by this impressive lens... if you open the aperture at maximum I think the camera could burn!
Happy shots! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Hi Michael,
Many thanks for sharing these fascinating images. I will check the flea-bay to see what the 0.95/50 Canon lens cost these days. Rare lenses could be a good investment IMO. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Here is a real rare one, a Chinese military missile tracking lens! I think it is a 2000mm F7 mirror lens, and it weighs about 30 kilograms. It is a very sharp lens, and I can read an article title of a newspaper a few hundred meters away! But I need a small truck to carry it. The second image was borrowed from the web. The seller told me that it was removed from a similar vechicle for tracking missiles.
Today, it seems the PLA has much better such tracking devices.
Last edited by kievuser on Sat May 14, 2016 7:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A Cooke Speed Panchro 28/2 T2.3 movie lens. Cooke movie lenes are not rare, but I don't see a 28mm one very often. It could be an uncommon lens.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sceptic
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
sceptic wrote:
Perhaps not as rare as other lenses mentioned already, byt my rarest lens nonetheless:
Kodak Recordak Micro File Ektar by scepticswe, on Flickr
The zebra-pattern mount is my adapter to convert it to M42.
The lens was used to scan newspapers to micro film during WW2:
_________________ Sony A7R and wildly varying flora of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
I like lenses with a history. Thanks for sharing. I will read the article later. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Meisei Werden 10cm f/3.5 ltm (a rebranded Tanaka Kogaku Tele-Tanar 10cm)
camera-wiki.org writes:
«The Tele-Tanar 10cm f/3.5 is mentioned as available soon in November 1955» and «The 10cm f/3.5 was probably sold in limited quantities only, and no surviving example has been observed yet.»
Here it is :
Source: http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Tanar_lenses _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no
Last edited by Nordentro on Sat May 14, 2016 8:51 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A couple of Nikon printing lenes. It seems that the 450mm F9 one is much less often seen. I don't know why?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A Chinese movie anamorphic projection lens beside a French counterpart.
It is not rare, but rarely seen outside China for sale. It was made in late 1970's.
I don't know which one is rarer bwteen the two.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Thanks Nordentro for sharing the information and image. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
I am puzzled with this rare OM Zuiko mount Chinese marco lens 50/3.5. It focus down to 0.15 meter and it has a very different construction than a Zuiko 50/3.5 macro lens with a much bigger front element.Why the user would want such a lens being custom made when he could use an original OM macro lens easily? It has no s/n, and I haven't seen another one yet over the years.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
Thanks Nordentro for sharing the information and image. |
Oh, no need for that, this is a fun thread
Missiltronics 48mm f/1.9 (rather rare lens, but I have seen a couple more online). TV-lens made by Cosmicar (pentax) and the lens covers FF and has standard m39 focal flange distance (28.8mm) and mount. Missiltronics must be the coolest brand name ever
_________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Have you seen a lens with an opaque front lens element? Here is a most mysterious Chinese lens that I have seen over the years. It looks like one of the industrial lenses for computer chip making with a reduction rate of 1/50X. But why it has such an element? For X ray or some invisible light? But it has a letter e on the front ring, so that it was made for E-line reduction use. Could it be that the original lens was transparant, but the material (could be a kind of nature one) deteriorated over the years so it became opaque? It was made in 1973. It has a m40x0.75 thread screw mount. This is the only one I have seen even among the already quite rare Chinese ultra micro lenses.
These industrial lenses has a very high resolving power of a few hundred lp/mm and minimum distortion according to the poster page.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A couple of Carl Zeiss Jena M40 screw mount lenses. I think the Triotar 85/4 is quite rare, or no? It seems much less often seen than other M40 mount lenses.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A Haiou-71 50mm F1.4 CRT lens for Seagull DFAB industrial camera. This lens has no aperture, and with limited focusing range. It is much less often seen than the 58/2 biotar copy lens that is also seen mounted on this camera. The 50/2 Great Wall 35mm movie lens made in 1976 is also quite rare. If IIRC, Nikon also has such a lens (50mm F1? CRT) that is very rare and expensive to a collector.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marek
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 903 Location: In the heart of Europe
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marek wrote:
I think this one is fairly rare too. A prewar CZJ Tele-Tessar 25cm f/6.3 in well preserved conditon. But I do know about another 3-4 copies being spread in the world. Another one will certainly have member Exaklaus.
IIRC my copy has horrible performance for some reason (no relation to the lens condition, it just performs somewhat poorly)
_________________ Angry young man !
Flickr | Juzaphoto | Ebay sales
marekfiser [at] gmail [dot] com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Size comparison of two mirror lenses, one is a Soviet MTO 1000A 1100mm F10.5 for 35mm cameras, and the previouly mentioned Chinese medium format 1000mm F6.7 . The Chinese lens weighs about 6-700 grams lighter. Both lenses perform about the same for sharpness .But the Chinese lens image has a slightly warmer tone. I don't remember ever seen a similar lens on-line for such a medium format lens. It could be of a Chinese original design.Those Zeiss or Nikon 1000mm mirror lenses are much heavier.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
Thanks Marek for your contribution! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A huge and rarely seen Chinese printing lens 900mm F11. It was made in 1988 according its s/n by Shanghai Camera factory.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|