Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Short Tele lens comparison on NEX-3 (Part 1 - Close-ups)
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 2:39 pm    Post subject: Short Tele lens comparison on NEX-3 (Part 1 - Close-ups) Reply with quote

Klaus was so nice to send me a copy of the Carl Zeiss Tevidon 2.8/70 in c-mount (Thanks, Klaus! The lens will travel back to you soon!), in order to check if it covers the APS-sensor of the NEX. So I decided to perform a little shoot-out of some nice short tele lenses.

Those were the contestants:


From the left:

* Carl Zeiss Tevidon 2.8/70 (c-mount)
* Leica Elmar 4/90 (M39LTM)
* Nikkor-H 1.8/85 (F mount)
* Schneider-Kreuznach Tele-Xenar 3.8/75 (Robot mount)
* Steinheil Culminar 2.8/85 VL (M42)

Nikkor-H 1.8/85 @ f/2.8 (stopped a little more than one stop):

I publish this comparision in the "oversized gallery" so that I can show bigger images.

I shot frames wide open and at f/5.6 (and with the Nikkor at f/2.8, because it is such a fast lens wide open).

Here are the first results (the full frame, wide open):

Carl Zeiss Tevidon 2.8/70


Leica Elmar 4/90


Nikkor-H 1.8/85

Nikkor-H 1.8/85@ f/2.8


Schneider-Kreuznach Tele-Xenar 3.8/75


Steinheil Culminar 2.8/85 VL


Well, there is not much difference, but the 100% crop show more:

Carl Zeiss Tevidon 2.8/70


Leica Elmar 4/90


Nikkor-H 1.8/85

Nikkor-H 1.8/85@ f/2.8


Schneider-Kreuznach Tele-Xenar 3.8/75


Steinheil Culminar 2.8/85 VL


The shots at f/5.6 are all very good. There is no reall point in showing them here.

Next part will be a bokeh comparison...


Last edited by LucisPictor on Tue May 24, 2011 3:04 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My sharpness ranking:

1. Schneider-Kreuznach Tele-Xenar 3.8/75
2. Carl Zeiss Tevidon 2.8/70 (very close to #1)
3. Nikkor-H 1.8/85
4. Leica Elmar 4/90
5. Steinheil Culminar 2.8/85 VL (with considerable distance!)

The Steinheil with its "glow" can be used as an effect lens, really, rather than as a sharp close up. It produces fantastic portraits!


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with the ranking of the Schneider-Kreuznach. That particular
image simply popped up as the superior overall quality of image.


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SK Tele-Xenar really stands out from others, but it can be partly due to deeper DOF.


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BRunner wrote:
SK Tele-Xenar really stands out from others, but it can be partly due to deeper DOF.


Yes, you may be right. I hadn't noticed at first. Cool


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's the Xenar for me too, I take on board the DOF comment but even so, it seems to separate the stamens (?) of the flower with much greater clarity than the rest?

Doug


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 3D quality of the Schneider Tele-Xenar is impressive. Superbe micro-contrast.