MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
DiskFreeVault safely moves Mac apps and data to external storage.
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

My Takumar collection ( from 15 to 1000mm )
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply

Spotmatic wrote:
Rolf wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
I know linkmaarts' but don't have time for it, I'm only searching on Ebay Razz


Hi,

sorry but what is "linkmaarts" ?

Rolf


I guess that's the obfuscated version of a well-known Dutch marketplace Wink


Hi,

must I understand the joke ? Embarassed

Rolf


Reply

Rolf wrote:
Spotmatic wrote:
Rolf wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
I know linkmaarts' but don't have time for it, I'm only searching on Ebay Razz


Hi,

sorry but what is "linkmaarts" ?

Rolf


I guess that's the obfuscated version of a well-known Dutch marketplace Wink


Hi,

must I understand the joke ? Embarassed

Rolf


OK, I'll just give you the correct address. What he was referring to is www.marktplaats.nl,. a well known Dutch trading site (now owned by eBay).


Reply

Spotmatic wrote:
Rolf wrote:
Spotmatic wrote:
Rolf wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
I know linkmaarts' but don't have time for it, I'm only searching on Ebay Razz


Hi,

sorry but what is "linkmaarts" ?

Rolf


I guess that's the obfuscated version of a well-known Dutch marketplace Wink


Hi,

must I understand the joke ? Embarassed

Rolf


OK, I'll just give you the correct address. What he was referring to is www.marktplaats.nl,. a well known Dutch trading site (now owned by eBay).


Thank you for the link. Now I can learn Dutch. Laughing
Goede nacht !!

Rolf


Reply

Rolf wrote:
Spotmatic wrote:
Rolf wrote:
Spotmatic wrote:
Rolf wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
I know linkmaarts' but don't have time for it, I'm only searching on Ebay Razz


Hi,

sorry but what is "linkmaarts" ?

Rolf


I guess that's the obfuscated version of a well-known Dutch marketplace Wink


Hi,

must I understand the joke ? Embarassed

Rolf


OK, I'll just give you the correct address. What he was referring to is www.marktplaats.nl,. a well known Dutch trading site (now owned by eBay).


Thank you for the link. Now I can learn Dutch. Laughing
Goede nacht !!

Rolf


Oh great - let's start a 'how big can this reply get' thread...

Whilst we are first and foremost collectors, let us not for a moment think that it's a competition to have the most kit in the world Wink

Because it's not...


Reply

I got it !



An amazing information quantity, just to give an idea :



(bad quality, I know)


Reply

Great source of information indeed. I have two of them, just in case. By the way, my first Asahiflex was bought from Fred Sherfy himself Cool


Reply

Spotmatic wrote:
Great source of information indeed. I have two of them, just in case. By the way, my first Asahiflex was bought from Fred Sherfy himself Cool


you wouldn't mind selling one of those would you?


Reply

Séamuis wrote:
Spotmatic wrote:
Great source of information indeed. I have two of them, just in case. By the way, my first Asahiflex was bought from Fred Sherfy himself Cool


you wouldn't mind selling one of those would you?


Who knows Smile But please let me find them first, as my books are now in boxes (we have moved a month ago).

In the meantime, here's a lens variation that's not described in Gerjan van Oosten's book:





As you can see this is in fact a Super-Takumar. If you compare it with the other variation on page 123 of Gerjan's book, there are the following differences:

- The lens has 1/2 stops marked as dots between the diaphragm values;
- The lines marking the depth of field are angled instead of straight;
- No "ft/m" engraved to the left of the distance scale;
- Distance markings in white/red (usually: yellow/blue).

Nothing earth-shattering though Smile


Reply

was this a very early example of this Auto(super)-Takumar? I have a copy of the much more common version, but I have never seen this one before. very neat.



Spotmatic wrote:
Séamuis wrote:
Spotmatic wrote:
Great source of information indeed. I have two of them, just in case. By the way, my first Asahiflex was bought from Fred Sherfy himself Cool


you wouldn't mind selling one of those would you?


Who knows Smile But please let me find them first, as my books are now in boxes (we have moved a month ago).

In the meantime, here's a lens variation that's not described in Gerjan van Oosten's book:





As you can see this is in fact a Super-Takumar. If you compare it with the other variation on page 123 of Gerjan's book, there are the following differences:

- The lens has 1/2 stops marked as dots between the diaphragm values;
- The lines marking the depth of field are angled instead of straight;
- No "ft/m" engraved to the left of the distance scale;
- Distance markings in white/red (usually: yellow/blue).

Nothing earth-shattering though Smile


Reply

I never saw a 55/1.8 like this Shocked

BTW, I got an other rare thing : a black Asahi Pentax K Very Happy


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
I never saw a 55/1.8 like this Shocked

BTW, I got an other rare thing : a black Asahi Pentax K Very Happy


Nice, very rare indeed! You only see these once a year or so. I've never had one of those, but I had new replacement top and bottom plates for it (for the AP too). In what condition is the paint of your K?


Reply

It will cost me approximatively 45€, with a Domiplan 50/2.8, an Hanimex flash and a Tamron X2 teleconverter. The body has not been tested, so I'm not sure it is working, and the paint is not in e very good condition ( Click here to see on Ebay ) but I could not let a black K go at this price Laughing


Reply

Looks like you could've used my replacement top and bottom plates Smile

Not a nice camera, but still a very nice find. What you've paid is nothing... Shocked


Reply

For rare pieces like this, my general mind is not to obtain a mint piece, but to obtain it, it's all. Here I have a black K, and I can pay a professionnal repairing, and still cost me a good price Very Happy And if one day I grab a mint one, I can sell this body, it's juste a matter of time and luck Razz


Reply

Quote:
For rare pieces like this, my general mind is not to obtain a mint piece, but to obtain it, it's all.


I always look for mint pieces. so I end up paying more than most people. but every once in a while I get a good deal. I got my macro-takumar (preset) for 250 USD. it is mint, and I do mean mint. all original packaging, paperwork, etc. it had never been mounted, still in its plastic wrapping. I have 5 lenses now that I purchased in this condition.


Reply

As I use my lenses (ok, some are not very used like the 18/11, 24/3.5 or 55/1.Cool, I d'ont need an absolutely mint lens. For me, it would be "useless" to buy a lens unopened in its box (unless I pay it peanuts Razz ) because my collection is also my source of lenses for photography Smile But if I can have a near new lens, at good price, I take it Razz
Now I have many lenses with very, very few using marks: (18/11, 20/4.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 85/1.8, 120/2.8, 135/2.5, 150/4 and 300/4 are really close to be new, and I have the original box of the S-M-C 135/2.5 Smile (also boxed Auto Takumar 85/1.8 but lens isn't in good condition)


Reply

Quote:
because my collection is also my source of lenses for photography


so is mine. I use all of my lenses. the macro-takumar is mounted to my MX right now.


Reply

Heresy Shocked You must use a Spotmatic Twisted Evil


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
Heresy Shocked You must use a Spotmatic Twisted Evil


it would actually be more correct to mount it to a pre-spotmatic body. the lens was released in '62 the spotmatic wasn't released till '64. I could mount it to my SV, but truth be told I prefer my MX over every body I have. and the MX just fits so well with Takumars, being so small. only downside to the MX is that its not an m42 body. Wink


Reply

Séamuis wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
Heresy Shocked You must use a Spotmatic Twisted Evil


it would actually be more correct to mount it to a pre-spotmatic body. the lens was released in '62 the spotmatic wasn't released till '64. I could mount it to my SV, but truth be told I prefer my MX over every body I have. and the MX just fits so well with Takumars, being so small. only downside to the MX is that its not an m42 body. Wink


Buy another MX and glue an adapter permanently to the bayonet. Presto: here's the M42 MX version Razz


Reply

Spotmatic wrote:
Séamuis wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
Heresy Shocked You must use a Spotmatic Twisted Evil


it would actually be more correct to mount it to a pre-spotmatic body. the lens was released in '62 the spotmatic wasn't released till '64. I could mount it to my SV, but truth be told I prefer my MX over every body I have. and the MX just fits so well with Takumars, being so small. only downside to the MX is that its not an m42 body. Wink


Buy another MX and glue an adapter permanently to the bayonet. Presto: here's the M42 MX version Razz


but I wouldn't have open-aperture metering. Sad


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
I never saw a 55/1.8 like this Shocked

BTW, I got an other rare thing : a black Asahi Pentax K Very Happy


did you get the "Zebra" 55mm f1.8 auto-tak with the black K?


Reply

No, but it is not very important for me, as I have a S-M-C 55/1.8, the zebra 55/1.8 would be only for collection Wink


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
No, but it is not very important for me, as I have a S-M-C 55/1.8, the zebra 55/1.8 would be only for collection Wink


A K without the Zebra just isn't the same. Laughing




Reply

Blue wrote:
A K without the Zebra just isn't the same. Laughing


Lovely words Wink Laughing Wink