MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
logovectorizer.com
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

My Takumar collection ( from 15 to 1000mm )
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply


More used than expected, but still a bargain Razz


Reply

Btw. did you try to compare S-M-C 85/1.8 and the older Auto 85/1.8?


Reply

Not yet. But now I have the 85/1.9, I've almost all 85mm Takumar (yes, I lack the 83/1.9 and the achromatic's), I'll compare them, I only need time Razz

Today's win : SMC Takumar 50/1.4 (with this f***ing rubberised focus ring), 57€ without shipping. But with free Super Takumar 28/3.5 and S-M-C 135/3.5 Twisted Evil


Reply

New organisation in my room :
First part, from left to right :





(my chrome SP is not pictured, it will be exchanged with my black SPII when the film will be ended)





Second part, from bottom to top :








(all pics with Super Takumar 55/1.8 @f/1.8 handheld)


Reply

Apologies again for hijacking your thread CarbonR, but the book arrived earlier this week...oh man, it's even better than I had hoped for. Don't know about others copies, but this one is a first-edition copy(then again, perhaps there was only one edition), and it's immaculate. Thank you Germany!!!


Reply

This book is the most comprehensive I have about Asahi Optical, more important for me than the Asahi Pentax Manual (Morgan Publishing) Smile


Reply

I received the SMC 50/1.4, S-M-C 135/3.5 and the Super 28/3.5 Razz

And got a mint S-M-C 120/2.8 Twisted Evil


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
I received the SMC 50/1.4, S-M-C 135/3.5 and the Super 28/3.5 Razz

And got a mint S-M-C 120/2.8 Twisted Evil


OK, now it's time for you to go on vacation without internet (so that I at least have some chance to find a few nice Taks myself).

Just kidding of course, congratulations. Now if you can find a 100mm Takumar in M42 mount for me... Wink

BTW: I finally have unearthed Gerjan van Oosten's book yesterday. It's been in a box for 3 years, and it's refreshing to re-read his book now that I have a bit more knowledge on the subject.

By the way, have you already located a 55mm (f/1.8 I believe) Auto-Takumar with on the diaphragm ring white dots between the f/stops? I should take a photo of it and post it here if you don't know what I mean. It's the Auto-Takumar with Super-Takumar diaphragm actuation.


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
Not yet. But now I have the 85/1.9, I've almost all 85mm Takumar (yes, I lack the 83/1.9 and the achromatic's), I'll compare them, I only need time Razz

Today's win : SMC Takumar 50/1.4 (with this f***ing rubberised focus ring), 57€ without shipping. But with free Super Takumar 28/3.5 and S-M-C 135/3.5 Twisted Evil


I have a second Ultra-Achromatic Takumar 85mm (of the about 20 or so known to exist...) just in case...but it is a "little bit" more than your recent 50/1.4 win.... Wink Wink


Reply

kds315* wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
Not yet. But now I have the 85/1.9, I've almost all 85mm Takumar (yes, I lack the 83/1.9 and the achromatic's), I'll compare them, I only need time Razz

Today's win : SMC Takumar 50/1.4 (with this f***ing rubberised focus ring), 57€ without shipping. But with free Super Takumar 28/3.5 and S-M-C 135/3.5 Twisted Evil


I have a second Ultra-Achromatic Takumar 85mm (of the about 20 or so known to exist...) just in case... Wink Wink


Would it actually be usable for normal photography? Or maybe you also have a nice Quartz-Takumar for me? Wink Wink


Reply

Spotmatic wrote:
kds315* wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
Not yet. But now I have the 85/1.9, I've almost all 85mm Takumar (yes, I lack the 83/1.9 and the achromatic's), I'll compare them, I only need time Razz

Today's win : SMC Takumar 50/1.4 (with this f***ing rubberised focus ring), 57€ without shipping. But with free Super Takumar 28/3.5 and S-M-C 135/3.5 Twisted Evil


I have a second Ultra-Achromatic Takumar 85mm (of the about 20 or so known to exist...) just in case... Wink Wink


Would it actually be usable for normal photography? Or maybe you also have a nice Quartz-Takumar for me? Wink Wink


It is one of the sharpest I've seen so far, esp. also that UA Tak 300mm and both are apochromatic form ultraviolet to infrared, 200-1100nm for the 85mm - show me another lens capable of that ...!!

Quartz Takumar is the older and -even- much rarer version than the UA 85mm, increadibly complicated to use because of NOT being focus corrected!! No wonder it was just sold for about a year or so and then replöaced by the much better UA 85mm.


Reply

Today'win : cased S-M-C 24/3.5, excellent condition, 78€ shipping included Twisted Evil

And the Sherfy's book on Asahiflex's and early Asahi Pentax cameras, plus the S-M-C 120/2.8 shloud arrive this week Very Happy


Reply

Got my first Asahi Kogaku lens this night, 41$ in USA Twisted Evil

So, when I'll receive all my lenses, I will have :

28 different optical formulae ! (29 lenses : 50/4 lenses have the same optical formula but one goes to lifesize, the other goes only to half lifesize)

Fish Eye Takumar 18/11 (1963-1966)
S-M-C Takumar 20/4.5 (1973-1979)
S-M-C Takumar 24/3.5 (1973-1979)
Super-Takumar 28/3.5 V1 (1965-1966)
S-M-C Takumar 28/3.5 (1971-1979)
S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 (1971-1979)
Super Takumar 35/2 V1 (1966-1968)
S-M-C Takumar 35/2 (1972-1979)
Auto-Takumar 35/2.3 (1959-1962)
Super-Takumar 50/1.4 V1 (1964-1966)
SMC Takumar 50/1.4 (1973-1975)
Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 50/3.5 V2 (1953-1954)
Macro-Takumar 50/4 (1966-1969)
S-M-C Macro Takumar 50/4 (1971-1979)
S-M-C Takumar 55/1.8 (1971-1972)
Auto-Takumar 55/2.2 (1961)
Super-Takumar 85/1.9 (1965-1971)
Auto-Takumar 85/1.8 (1960-1962)
S-M-C Takumar 85/1.8 (1973-1979)
S-M-C Takumar 105/2.8 (1971-1976)
S-M-C Takumar 120/2.8 (1973-1976)
Takumar 135/3.5 (1962)
S-M-C Takumar 135/3.5 (1971-1979)
S-M-C Takumar 135/2.5 V2 (1973-1979)
S-M-C Takumar 150/4 (1971-1979)
Takumar 200/3.5 (1962-1966)
S-M-C Takumar 200/4 (1971-1979)
Super-Takumar 300/4 (1969-1972)
Tele-Takumar 400/5.6 (1968-1971)


6x7 lenses and lenses that I sell are not mentionned here. Almost all lenses with their caps, case, near new or excellent condition, two boxed lenses, 9 différents types of front caps Twisted Evil


Reply

Very, very nice list! But what are you going to do when your list is complete? Twisted Evil

BTW, what A-K Takumar have you won? You say "V2" and to my knowledge that's the middle version with the silver lens beauty ring (the standard lens of the Asahiflex IA). I'm glad to have all three and the 58/2.4 as well Twisted Evil


Reply

The list is far to be completed, if I want at least, one lens for each optical formula Laughing But maybe.... take pictures with my lenses ? Razz

Y'oure right, according to the ultimate screwmout guide :
V1 (named Model I in the book, but V1 is shorter Razz ) : chrome plate
V2 : chrome conical
V3 : black conical

Here's the lens I won :



Reply

Hi,

here my little Takumar collection. When I look around it seems that there are a lot of lenses which I have to look for within the next months. Shocked

At the moment I believe that the prices increase every day. Yesterday at Eb.... a SMC 1.4/50 for approx. 100 €, or is this ok ?



My favorites are the f:4 and f:5.6 200mm lenses.

Rolf


Reply

Well, it's my personal belief that good Takumars will never get cheap again. At least not on eBay c.s. It's just a matter of time before people realize the superb optical and mechanical quality of the Takumars and early K-mount lenses. K-mount lenses are currently more expensive than their M-series counterparts.


Reply

With time and patience, we can found good prices, my SMC Takumar 50/1.4 cost me currently 32€ with a S-M-C 135/3.5 Razz


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
With time and patience, we can found good prices, my SMC Takumar 50/1.4 cost me currently 32€ with a S-M-C 135/3.5 Razz


So what, I got them even cheaper. But not on eBay of course Smile


Reply

I know linkmaarts' but don't have time for it, I'm only searching on Ebay Razz


Reply

Spotmatic wrote:
Well, it's my personal belief that good Takumars will never get cheap again. At least not on eBay c.s. It's just a matter of time before people realize the superb optical and mechanical quality of the Takumars and early K-mount lenses. K-mount lenses are currently more expensive than their M-series counterparts.


While the old lenses can be used in new digital bodies, prices of the good ones will be up.

Rino.


Reply

CarbonR wrote:
I know linkmaarts' but don't have time for it, I'm only searching on Ebay Razz


Hi,

sorry but what is "linkmaarts" ?

Rolf


Reply

Rolf wrote:
CarbonR wrote:
I know linkmaarts' but don't have time for it, I'm only searching on Ebay Razz


Hi,

sorry but what is "linkmaarts" ?

Rolf


I guess that's the obfuscated version of a well-known Dutch marketplace Wink


Reply

I dont remember the exact name, Spotmatic surely knows it Wink


Reply

Got it !

150-135-120-105 :




120 @2.8 :


120 @5.6 :