 Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:38 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
RioRico wrote:
I look at must-have's above and except for the Fleks and CZJ glass, I find I have many of what are desired. Guess I was lucky on that eBay spree a couple years ago. I guess the biggest holes in my lineup are: SMC Takumar 15/3.5 -- some 24/2 -- Super-Takumar or Mir-24M 35/2 -- some 180/2.8 maybe. I don't suppose anyone with an extra Mir-24M would like to swap for a SuperTak 55/2? I didn't think so...
Besides those praised above, a couple that SHOULD be on must-have lists include the Isco Westron 35/2.8 (plastic ring, great optics) and Tele-Tak 200/5.6 (small, almost faultless). And the apochromatic Industar-50 is pretty damn good on tubes.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
My M42/M39s:
Isco Westron 35/2.8
Pentax: S-T 35/3.5; Tak 55/1.8; S-T 55/2; S-T 200/4; Tele-Tak 200/5.6
Mir-1BV 37/2.8; Industar-50/3.5; Helios 44M 58/2; Jupiter: J9 85/2; J11 135/4; J21M 200/4
Meyer: Oreston 50/1.8; Domiplan 50/2.8 (x2); Primotar 50/3.5; Trioplan 100/2.8; Telemegor 180/5.5
Enna Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5, Tele-Ennalyt 240/4.5
(Tokina) Super-Lentar 21/2.8; Super-Albinar 24/2.8; Viv 28/2.8; Viv 35/2.8; Viv 75-260/4.5-6.2
(Komine) Viv 90/2.8 macro; Viv 200/3.5; (Kiron) Viv S1.V1 70/210/3.5; (Chinon) Argus Auto-Cintar 55/1.7; Alpa 300/5.6
Sigma-Z 24/2.8; Opticam and Suntar 135/2.8; Spiratone 400/5.6
Hanimex 28/2.8 (x2); Hanimar 135/2.8, 135/3.5
Porst: Weitwinkel 35/2.8; Color Reflex 55/2.8; MC-AD 135/2.8
_________________
Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
