View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:15 pm Post subject: *ist D focus out |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Oh balls
I've been taking some pics at full aperture, but the image has been out of focus. So I set it on a tripod with remote release, focussed really carefully, and took pics. The focus point in the resulting image is further away by almost half a metre
Can that be fixed, do you think?
I have zero budget to replace it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Riku
Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1059 Location: Finland
Expire: 2017-04-30
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Riku wrote:
Are you talking about manual or auto focus? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Good point, I missed that vital information out of my message
...it is with manual focus lenses. I tested it with my old Helios 44-2 and Industar 50-2. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Did you rely on the focus confirmation or did you use the ground glass screen? _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
I just used the screen. I didn't know there was focus confirm on MF
...I shall read the manual this evening |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
Graham this is manually focusing, yes?
I believe that it must be the focus screen that is not installed properly, and that this should be all that's wrong!
In case of backfocusing, as you describe, you need to put the focus screen further away from the prism, more close to the mirror. Split focus screens come with spacers, but mine did not. I applied layers of thin adhesive tape to the very outer left and right edges of the screen.
The *ist is designed to easily take out and again put in the focus screen, see: http://www.focusingscreen.com/work/k7en.htm
resp. this on 'theory' of correct installation:
http://www.focusingscreen.com/work/test-fsen.htm
hope this helps
Andreas
edit:
oh..I took so long to write my answer, there had been a few answers already.
yes, there is double focus confirmation, one is a peep sound ( which can be turned off ) and the other a green hexagon lighting up in the viewfinder
as mentioned before I believe it just must be the focus screen being badly installed - maybe the prior owner had a split focus screen for manual lenses installed but before selling the camera had - badly placed - the original back in _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections
Last edited by kuuan on Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Fabulous, thankyou so much. I shall go and get my lights and tweezers and set about checking the screen - then find out how to turn the peep and hexagon on |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
Graham googling I found that various users seemed to have had problems to get the focus confirm on the *istD, others say that it is there, just as it is on my *istDs and K-x, all other Pentax dSLRs.
this is how you should be able to set up your camera for using manual lenses incl. focus confirmation:
Go to Custom Menu and scroll down.
"FI with S Lens used" >> select "Available"
and if you haven't done this already..
"Using aperture ring" >> select "Permitted"
and set the focus mode switch on the side of the mount to 'M'
If the *istD behaves like my *istDs you can use M42 lenses in Av mode. Viewfinder will darken ( = dof preview ) when stopping down.
For K mount lenses without electrical contacts use M mode. Lens stays open / viewfinder stays at it's brightest even if stopped down. Before releasing press "AE-L" button, this will stop down the lens to meter and select shutter speed. Turning the on/off switch to the far right position will stop down the lens for as long as you keep the switch in this position = dof preview
Some M42 lenses also may meter better in M mode and pressing AE-L button than when using Av mode, for M42 lenses both these modes can be used alternatively _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
kuuan wrote: |
hope this helps
Andreas |
Excellent advice Andreas.
@ Graham: I had exactly the same problem with my Canon. It took two layers of Magic tape to correct it, yours may be different of course. If you use tweezers, the ends need to be covered in something soft to avoid scratching the screen, electrical tape will do it. And I'd recommend you wear tight Marigolds or those vinyl disposable gloves to avoid getting greasy fingerprints on the screen. It's sooo much easier to be able to grip the screen in your fingers. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
I only have the setting "F stop other than A" which is the way to make the *ist D to work with manual lenses. I am familiar with later versions like yours from my K100D that I had a couple of years ago, but this one doesn't have those extra settings, which is a shame.
Anyway, I can't get any focus confirm to work at all with the M42 lens but if I fit the 18-55mm Samsung, then it does work as you describe in MF mode. I guess the original *ist ain't all that clever compared to later versions.
I've now removed and re-seated the focus screen. Thanks for the excellent links to the instructions - really useful I shall save those instructions for future use too.
Tomorrow morning I shall conduct some focussing tests with the M42 lens as per today, and also the 18-55 in MF mode. Maybe the problem is my eyes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
for the M42 lenses that do not give focus confirm on *istD.. shortening some contacts on the camera mount with a foil may make it work. I don't know which contacts, googling it you may find out - or you could scrap off the black paint on the mount of the lens to do the job
if that doesn't work "Superimpose AF Area" set to "ON" will at least have the red AF indicators light up when in focus, I think.. _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
I have done some more tests. I am only noticing the focus shift on the Helios f2 lens. I did a dozen shots, re-focussing each time, and the focus was generally slightly further away, but sometimes very close. On the Industar f3.5 and Lydith f3.5, the focus was ok. Using the Samsung AF zoom in MF with focus confirm, it was ok too.
My conclusion is that the focus screen is probably ok, but the very slight movement of the focus ring on the f2 lens when hunting for perfect focus is enough to move the focus point quite a long way, and my old eyes aren't good enough to focus with a plain screen. The f3.5 lenses have that tiny bit more depth of field, so it is probably making-up for my poor eyes.
The photos with the confirm peep and LED signal with the Samsing lens were all perfect focus. But I guess that works by different method than the focus screen. That said, at 50mm setting the zoom is f5.6 wide open, so again makes up for my poor eyes.
I shall over the coming year add some PK/A lenses in these focal lengths so I can use the focus confirm function of the camera, and in the meantime not use the Helios wide open until I can get the split-prism screen.
Perhaps I need to convince Attila to create AFLenses.com
I hate all the stuff that stops working properly as I get older |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jieffe
Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Posts: 754 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jieffe wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
I have done some more tests. I am only noticing the focus shift on the Helios f2 lens. I did a dozen shots, re-focussing each time, and the focus was generally slightly further away, but sometimes very close. On the Industar f3.5 and Lydith f3.5, the focus was ok. Using the Samsung AF zoom in MF with focus confirm, it was ok too. |
That's the usual problem with the stock focusing screen : it is unable to correctly indicate the focus for lenses faster than f2.8 (thus your problem with the Helios not occuring with the Industar/Lydith/Samsung).
That's why people change it for a split screen. As you said that you have a zero budget, maybe you have an old non-functionnal SLR that could donate its screen (which will need to be resized). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Jieffe wrote: |
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
I have done some more tests. I am only noticing the focus shift on the Helios f2 lens. I did a dozen shots, re-focussing each time, and the focus was generally slightly further away, but sometimes very close. On the Industar f3.5 and Lydith f3.5, the focus was ok. Using the Samsung AF zoom in MF with focus confirm, it was ok too. |
That's the usual problem with the stock focusing screen : it is unable to correctly indicate the focus for lenses faster than f2.8 (thus your problem with the Helios not occuring with the Industar/Lydith/Samsung).
That's why people change it for a split screen. As you said that you have a zero budget, maybe you have an old non-functionnal SLR that could donate its screen (which will need to be resized). |
Thankyou, it is good news for me to know it's a known issue of the stock focus screen A split prism screen is on my shopping list, so one of these days I shall afford it. I operate a kind of "double-entry accounting" system with money now - if I buy things, I sell things of equal value I will have an ebay session tomorrow and get rid of junk from the shed
I like your idea of making one, but I cannot make myself break apart old cameras Although I do have a Praktica BC1 that got full of water
...this could actually be fun... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
very good recommendation of Jieffe!
a good focus screen and optional a viewfinder magnifier, that's what counts
( I personally forgot altogether that my camera has focus confirm and trust my eyes using a good split focus screen and the magnifier )
If you miss the focus confirm with the M42 lenses, if it is true, as I believe, that it is the blank metal of the K mounts which enables the focus confirm, than there is an obvious solution to also get it when using black painted M42 mounts.
It sounds as if your Helios may have a problem. Fussing with the focus screen when using it won't help resp. I'd advice to obviously use a perfectly well working lens to calibrate your focus screen, if so needed at all. _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
Graham, if you want I still have the focusing screen I used in my old *istD: it wass custom cut with a machine from a Canon EE-S and it works great for mf lenses.
Unfortunately, the guy who cut it (a fellow Italian Pentax user) wrapped it in lens paper then wrote on the paper with a felt pen, staining the screen. I cleaned it, but there are a couple smallish very faint stains left. They did never bother me and are invisible unless you frame a white wall. The screen of course works much better than the stock one for mf.
If you want it send me your address, and I will ship it sometime next week.
Ludo _________________ My galleries
Digital: Samsung EX-1
Past Digital: Samsung NX10, Sigma SD9, Sigma SD10, SD14, DP2, Pentax *istD, Kx, Fuji S2 Pro, Canon 5D
Analog: packfilm Polaroids, 6x9 Kodak folders, Pentacon Taxona half-frame, Fujica ST605n, Walz Envoy, Olympus 35 S-II, Olympus Wide S
Past Analog: Polaroid 600se, Polaroid 110B, Canon IIF, various fixed-lens and Russian rangefinders, ...
Past Lenses: Nikkor 24/2.8, Nikkor SC 50/1.4, Nikkor 50/2, Nikkor H 85/1.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5, Nikkor Q 135/3.5, Fujinon 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 135/3.5, Fujinon EBC 200/4.5, Mamiya SX 135/2.8, CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 zebra, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, ...
altroformato
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Really?
I don't know what to say That's very kind of you
I promise one day I shall re-pay you kindness |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
Really?
I don't know what to say That's very kind of you
I promise one day I shall re-pay you kindness |
Well I'm glad the screen will be put to good use. Only remind me about shipping if you don't hear from me by mid next week, as I tend to be forgetful from time to time. _________________ My galleries
Digital: Samsung EX-1
Past Digital: Samsung NX10, Sigma SD9, Sigma SD10, SD14, DP2, Pentax *istD, Kx, Fuji S2 Pro, Canon 5D
Analog: packfilm Polaroids, 6x9 Kodak folders, Pentacon Taxona half-frame, Fujica ST605n, Walz Envoy, Olympus 35 S-II, Olympus Wide S
Past Analog: Polaroid 600se, Polaroid 110B, Canon IIF, various fixed-lens and Russian rangefinders, ...
Past Lenses: Nikkor 24/2.8, Nikkor SC 50/1.4, Nikkor 50/2, Nikkor H 85/1.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5, Nikkor Q 135/3.5, Fujinon 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 135/3.5, Fujinon EBC 200/4.5, Mamiya SX 135/2.8, CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 zebra, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, ...
altroformato
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
I want to publicly thank you, Ludo
The focus screen arrived today
Thankyou so much. This evening I will fit it following your detailed instructions
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
I want to publicly thank you, Ludo
The focus screen arrived today
Thankyou so much. This evening I will fit it following your detailed instructions
|
Fantastic! It must be some kind of record for the Italian post, 48 hours from here to there, by regular airmail!
I hope it works ok for you! _________________ My galleries
Digital: Samsung EX-1
Past Digital: Samsung NX10, Sigma SD9, Sigma SD10, SD14, DP2, Pentax *istD, Kx, Fuji S2 Pro, Canon 5D
Analog: packfilm Polaroids, 6x9 Kodak folders, Pentacon Taxona half-frame, Fujica ST605n, Walz Envoy, Olympus 35 S-II, Olympus Wide S
Past Analog: Polaroid 600se, Polaroid 110B, Canon IIF, various fixed-lens and Russian rangefinders, ...
Past Lenses: Nikkor 24/2.8, Nikkor SC 50/1.4, Nikkor 50/2, Nikkor H 85/1.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5, Nikkor Q 135/3.5, Fujinon 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 135/3.5, Fujinon EBC 200/4.5, Mamiya SX 135/2.8, CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 zebra, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, ...
altroformato
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
48 hrs is good between two cities _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
It was the stamps, four of them, all with photo of the Pope on them. The package had help from above |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
It was the stamps, four of them, all with photo of the Pope on them. The package had help from above |
_________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
It was the stamps, four of them, all with photo of the Pope on them. The package had help from above |
_________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|