View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:19 pm Post subject: Fuji FinePix X100: large-format compact + Biogon-type lens |
|
|
no-X wrote:
It wasn't mentioned in the dpreview article, but the Fuji FinePix X100 will feature similar sensor-microlenses, like Leica, which are corrected for skewed light-rays...
this feature is necessary for usage of non-retrofocal classic-styled wide-angle lense, like their 23/2.0...
...which really lookes like a Biogon-type lens
If Fuji won't screw up the design, it could be very nice extremely low-distorsion and low-CA lens
I'm really happy to see that at least one manufacturer used common sense instead of silly marketing and didn't couple its mirror-less camera with retrofocal lens...
http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n100920.html _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
That looks great! I hope their mount will be compatible with M lens unlike Samsung. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
aleksanderpolo wrote: |
That looks great! I hope their mount will be compatible with M lens unlike Samsung. |
There is no mount, it's a compact (or at least, so I understand) _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
Orio wrote: |
aleksanderpolo wrote: |
That looks great! I hope their mount will be compatible with M lens unlike Samsung. |
There is no mount, it's a compact (or at least, so I understand) |
Just noticed that, never mind... there goes my hopes and dreams... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edz
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 Posts: 82 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
edz wrote:
It does look very nice, but the viewfinder and lcd are a bit smaller / lower spec that i'd like, and the price will probably be too much for me =( |
|
Back to top |
|
|
couchpotato
Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
couchpotato wrote:
This camera looks really sexy. If Fuji makes an interchangeable one.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
And is that MTF real or calculated? It's better than even the ZM 35/2! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5044 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Yes it is exciting, this is the third thread already about the same camera.
http://forum.mflenses.com/go-fuji-t32463.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/watch-this-baby-folks-fuji-x100-t32449.html _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Time to start saving!
But I reckon that a cam that goes for US$1000 in the States will be around €1200,- here in Germany. That's what it's usually like. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5084 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
Time to start saving!
But I reckon that a cam that goes for US$1000 in the States will be around €1200,- here in Germany. That's what it's usually like. |
Unfortunately, that's so true !
Even more, sometimes.
1000 $ in the US = 1000 € in europe... _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3245 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
The only reason is because you, over the pond, are richer than us.
No more whining, you can afford it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
That's because in the USA don't have the VAT, only a state tax that is much lower than a VAT
This is ideal for commerce and makes both buyers and sellers happy.
But in USA they also don't have the welfare that we in Europe have.
So I choose to pay VAT and have benefits of good welfare for everyone.
Taxes are good, really, if someone just gets to view a bit beyond his self.
It's the inequality that is not good (people with low income paying proportionally more taxes than rich people). That is where we have to work on. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 Posts: 1397 Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
Orio wrote: |
It's the inequality that is not good (people with low income paying proportionally more taxes than rich people). That is where we have to work on. |
Exactly. And don't forget our endemic problem where many people don't pay taxes at all, or pay ridiculous amounts compared to what they really earn. I wish the IRS had an Italian branch office with full powers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11059 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Why is called 'large format'?
In US if corporation tax breaks were eliminated government would make more money even if people pay no tax. Now people pay tax on income and tax on items bought, argh! _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
ludoo wrote: |
Orio wrote: |
It's the inequality that is not good (people with low income paying proportionally more taxes than rich people). That is where we have to work on. |
Exactly. And don't forget our endemic problem where many people don't pay taxes at all, or pay ridiculous amounts compared to what they really earn. I wish the IRS had an Italian branch office with full powers. |
Yes, that's part of the problem. Low income people are usually employees, who have a fixed controllable income.
Rich people is people with work like lawyer, dentist, etc. which can easily find ways not to declare to the state the real money that they earn.
I mean, in the last public tax reports, there were lawyers in my province that declared to earn less than what I earn as a employee!
But don't think it's just an Italian problem. Here it's bad, and probably the worst, but I read the EU figures some time ago and we're not alone in tax evasion. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Another expensive P+S - ho hum
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|