Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Franka Solida IIL and Xenar 3.5 samples
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:41 am    Post subject: Franka Solida IIL and Xenar 3.5 samples Reply with quote

I got the Epson v500 up and running last night, so here is one of my first samples. It shows the quality that can be achieved by a folding camera on an ultra lightweight tripod. All the hand-held shots were a bit soft.

I scanned at high resolution and downsized until I was happy with the image quality (which has really been defined by the grain in the 400ASA Fomapan film). At 150 dpi this would print at about 2 ft 6 in (75cm) square. The cropped out section is at 72dpi, so that is what you would see in a five-feet (150cm) square print, viewed at the distance you are from your screen; it is more realistic to step back a couple of paces so that you are viewing it from the distance you might look at a billboard.

I would say that the quality achieved by the Franka IIL/Xenar lens combination is up to modern glossy magazine quality IF the camera is clamped perfectly still.

The shot was taken at about 1/4s and probably around f8. I suspect that the problem with camera shake in hand-held shots is partly due to the light weight of the camera meaning there is more tendency to wave it around. However, the camera and tripod together weigh less than a 5D SLR.





PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's rather good. So much for the assertion that they were all crap.


PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Farside wrote:
That's rather good. So much for the assertion that they were all crap.


Smile Yes, that's what I thought (but I didn't like to say it). It's one of the first photos I've ever scanned, I'm sure the scanning could be improved, too. Flatness is a problem with the large films.

I'm now scanning a pile of slides from my 1978 Pennine Way walk, shot on my then-new Pentax ME Super. Oh dear, oh dear, I used to think they were good, but then I used to be happy with postcard size prints.