View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Vic Tor
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vic Tor wrote:
Hello everybody! I'm new here on this great site (although I'm visiting it already quite long) and I've just registered here to get some help to my Cyclop 85 1,2. According to your opinion I have the "unusable" version of Cyclop M1 with that long rear-lens protrusion:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
No, different lens, it's not based on the Helios-40. the unusable one had a long protrusion at the back, this doesn't and has a different optical formula, although we don't know what formula it has. |
I've found via internet two solutions to adapt it:
1. To use M42 macro rings to "hide" the protrusion in it - but there will focusing on infinity lost
2. To remove the protrusion with metal saw like in this italian forum (edit: see the link in the post below)
What is your opinion to the second solution? According to that italian site, there is no problem to remove the protrusion. But I am a bit sceptical, since there is a lens in the protrusion and removing it will change the optical formula. Do you know which funktion has this rear-lens? Did someone else use the second solution and cutted away the protrusion with metal saw?
I hope for some help here!
Thank you in advance,
VicTor
Last edited by Vic Tor on Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5078 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Your link doesn't work due to antispam measures.
I post the link of the italian forum :
http://www.canonclubitalia.com/public/forum/85mm-f-1-2-Russo-su-corpi-Canon-t148296.html
About the sawing solution.
It seems infinity is kept but min focusing distance is about 5 meters. To take his photos he had to add macro extension tubes.
I'm wondering wether it could be possible or not to cement the rear lens into the sawed back hole ? _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vic Tor
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vic Tor wrote:
Thank You, I will delete the link in my previous post.
Yes it is possible to take the lens out the rear-protrusion and if you're mechanically minded to fix it on the back hole. But is it just so easy? It will have than different optical distanse to the front lens-group.
Anyway, I wonder why it works without rear-lens at all!? What is it otherwise good for? Is it just for any distortion correction or something like this?
Sorry for perhaps stupid questions, I have really no clue about how optical systems in objectives are working. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
My lens did work well without rear-protrusion I could simple screw it off, working distance was long enough for full size human portrait, infinity is irrelevant with a fast lens like this. If I need infinity I use another photographic lens,keep in mind this lens made for night vision devices not for photography. I think rear-protrusion purpose only to get better usage for a night vision device. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5078 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Attila wrote: |
My lens did work well without rear-protrusion I could simple screw it off, working distance was long enough for full size human portrait, infinity is irrelevant with a fast lens like this. If I need infinity I use another photographic lens,keep in mind this lens made for night vision devices not for photography. I think rear-protrusion purpose only to get better usage for a night vision device. |
Wise and the raw truth ! _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vic Tor
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vic Tor wrote:
Attila wrote: |
My lens did work well without rear-protrusion I could simple screw it off, working distance was long enough for full size human portrait, infinity is irrelevant with a fast lens like this. If I need infinity I use another photographic lens,keep in mind this lens made for night vision devices not for photography. I think rear-protrusion purpose only to get better usage for a night vision device. |
Well, I will probably saw the protrusion away as well. Attila can You handle this lens better now? Can You post in your opinion the best portrait made with it (wide open, without cardboard aperture)? Could be nice for me to get some more courage and motivation for such serios "amputation".
Another possibility wich is coming in my mind right now, is to place the protrusion into the camera close enough to the sensor (smth. around 8mm if I measured it correct). I have A77 and I can theoretically remove the SLT-mirror so it will be not on the way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
My lens was 1.2 and removal was reversible, wasn't serious any time I could screw it back. Lens require carefully subject selections, but worth to have it as special lens for some shoots , not for all. I sold mine after test it was friend of mine property I just got it to try , test and sell it. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5078 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
another solution is to sell it and buy the 1.4. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BKSPicture
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 426 Location: Sverige
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
BKSPicture wrote:
Fast glas is always fun to play with
Nice shots! _________________ Homepage: http://www.bkspicture.com/
(My personal picture etc.)
Blog: http://www.blog.bkspicture.com/
(Lens & camera review, tips and tricks etc.)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6557 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
The Cyclops 85/1.2.
Well, I've just dragged mine out again and fiddled with it; with protrusion on and off.
Using extension tubes, the protrusion in place, the minimum focal distance is about four inches, the max is about eight inches.
Without the protrusion and a shortened extension tube (there's still a bit sticking out the back and I didn't want it hitting anything in the camera) the max f.d. increased to four feet and the minimum to about 1ft.
I've no intention of taking a hacksaw to this lens, but the securing screws are like plastic and I have to drill them out - a job I'll get around to sometime. In the meantime it's actually a decent closeup lens - with that huge front element it makes indoor lighting and focusing a snap. I think I'll keep it for that.
When I get the end piece off entirely I believe it might focus to infinity but its macro capability will be gone - I've got plenty of other lenses that are fantastic for infinity focus, what do I need another one for? _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop Norway
http://www.fomafoto.com/
Webshop Czech
https://fomaobchod.cz/inshop/scripts/shop.aspx?action=DoChangeLanguage&LangID=4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bwright
Joined: 04 Jan 2013 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bwright wrote:
Anyone here have samples of photos taken with this lens fully intact. Macro is fine. I am looking at getting one to adapt to Leica M mount, no mirror problem with the protrusion. Still not sure if it would cover full 35mm format but it would be nice to see what the IQ is like with all the glass intact. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|