View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
duta
Joined: 20 Nov 2013 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
duta wrote:
I want to know how is the last model of Helios 44-2 f2/58mm?
44-2 model "2.d": MMZ last design - new barrel
Is good or bad? I hope don't be the worst model Helios 44-2.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
duta wrote: |
I want to know how is the last model of Helios 44-2 f2/58mm?
44-2 model "2.d": MMZ last design - new barrel
Is good or bad? I hope don't be the worst model Helios 44-2.
|
_________________
C&C on my photos always welcome!
Nikon D300s, Canon 5D
Nikkor 24/2.8 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai, 105/2.5 Ai
Helios 44, 44-2, 44M-4, 81N, 77M-4, Jupiter 9, Zenitar 50/1.7
Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro, Samyang 8/3.5, Olympus Zuiko 28/2.8
Meyer Optik Trioplan 50/2.9, 100/2.8, Pentacon 80/2.8 AV
some AF lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
zanxion72
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 Posts: 145 Location: Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
zanxion72 wrote:
I have just acquired one like the Helios-44 zebra in M42. It is the same as another M39 stated some pages before, only the mount differs.
It reads HELIOS-44 2/58 N1013561, has an MMZ Logo. I have tried it against my other Helios 44-2 and found it to be considerably softer at all apertures. _________________ http://photographiagr.wordpress.com/
Come see me in Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nkarytianos/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanylapep
Joined: 03 Jan 2014 Posts: 312
|
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
vanylapep wrote:
Can I make a correction?
Quote: |
Helios 44 pre-set models (44, 44-2, 44-3)
Helios-44
- resolution: 35/14 or 36/17
- 8-13 aperture blades, pre-set aperture
- M39 SLR, sometimes appears as M42 model (possibly early version of 44-2 with old model ring)
- there is a KMZ prototype marked "Helios 44-1", but production models are always marked only as "44"
- serial number almost never corresponds to year of manufacture, nearly always begins by "N" or "N°"
- MMZ lenses with serial number beginning by "N40xxx", "N50xxx" or "N60xxx" are likely made in 1964, 1965 and 1966 (first number of sn very likely means year of 196x decade)
KMZ
silver, Π, "5,8cm", sn "N°000xxx", 13-blades, f/22 - rare
silver, Π, "5,8cm", sn "N°00xxx", 13-blades, f/16 - rare
silver, "2/58", sn "N°0xxx" or "N°00xxx", 13 blades
silver, "2/58", sn "N°0xxx", 8-blades
black + white lettering, "2/58", sn "N0xxx", 8 blades
black + white lettering, M42, "2/58", sn "N0xxx", 8 blades
MMZ
silver, "2/58", sn "N°40xxx", 8 blades
silver, "2/58", sn "N50xxx" or "N60xxx"
zebra, "2/58", sn "N°xxx" (e.g. 1970) |
I've seen N°000xxx, 13 blades, but with f/16 only. So not all N°000xxx are f/22.
Maybe I can also add a detail. It has a "silver" nose ring like the 3rd lens. I own a N°0xxx and it has a black nose ring like the 2nd lens.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piny
Joined: 25 Jan 2014 Posts: 3 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:10 am Post subject: helios 44M |
|
|
Piny wrote:
Hi,
im googling many hours and searching if anyone had my helios , but nope, could you please help me which type is this ?
SERIAL : 8144455
IT has yellow numbers and A/M switch
Thank you much
http://imgupload.sk/images/d/q/dqsvzoow5brbn6ozb1um.jpg
http://imgupload.sk/images/d/w/dwan84fha6bqg2m94xz0.jpg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16654 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Show a picture, says more that 1000 words! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piny
Joined: 25 Jan 2014 Posts: 3 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Piny wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Show a picture, says more that 1000 words! |
i cant, when i add link to photo it not showing it, but in preview yes... i know how works phpbb but there something sucks (not works as image too) im trying to add as [img] from your internal storage and from other server but it not works...
EDIT: now it start working...lol
_________________ Canon 5D mk II, Canon 600D
Canon 85mm F1.8, Canon 50mm F1.4, Canon 17-40 F4L, Helios 44m 58mm f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
You couldn't find the Helios 44m in a google search? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piny
Joined: 25 Jan 2014 Posts: 3 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Piny wrote:
themoleman342 wrote: |
You couldn't find the Helios 44m in a google search? |
yep i found som info but not details , if it has antireflective coat and so on ... _________________ Canon 5D mk II, Canon 600D
Canon 85mm F1.8, Canon 50mm F1.4, Canon 17-40 F4L, Helios 44m 58mm f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2014 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Here are my helioses:
(M42) 44-2, removed from surveillance camera, never used, serial starts with 88. Has 8 aperture blades.
(M42) MC 44M-6, removed from Zenit ET camera kit, never used. Serial starts with 91. Has 6 aperture blades.
(K mount) MC 44K-4, never used, I've acquired a box of these (20 pcs) in early 00s, serials start with 97. Has 6 aperture blades. _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gamera
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 86 Location: Scandinavia
|
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gamera wrote:
For the lens archeologists, here's the specs of yet another Helios-44.
Type 1f, identical in outlooks to the one in post:
http://forum.mflenses.com/complete-list-of-helios-lenses-getting-closer-t26100,start,30.html#1082046
Black M42, serial N03374XX, latin alphabets used. Filter thread 49mm.
Was mounted on a Zenit-E, serial 670XXXXX, KMZ logo engraved .
I have no paperworks, but have no reason to believe anything else that this is an original camera/lens combination.
No picture attached in this post. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
I've just purchased a Helios 44 M39 with red П, f22 type. I was finding it for several months with frustrations. Finally I found one with $225. Too expensive for a Helios 44, I guess but it's so rare now. I have 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 and actually I like them all. 44M-7 seems to have the best resolution as many people mentioned but I'm not sure if the bokeh is different from 44-2.
I'm too excited to wait for this Helios, but can't find any sample shots taken with this version. There was a post about the f16 version, which is very nice, and someone complained that the CA is bad, but there is no reference for this f22.
I'll definitely compare them when I get this lens.
Here is the photos provided by the seller
_________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrBB
Joined: 26 Mar 2014 Posts: 110 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrBB wrote:
HELIOS-44M 2/58 8199410 8blades M42
HELIOS-44M-4 2/58 86156682 6blades M42
HELIOS-44-2 2/58 78185958 8blades M42
yup, highly addictive lenses, but my real MF addiction start with MIR-1b 2.8/37 (and later MIR-I 2.8/37A with 2 set of blades)
(huh, 1st post ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zelda_n64
Joined: 26 Aug 2011 Posts: 163 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:48 pm Post subject: A Mothering Sunday Helios 44-2 |
|
|
zelda_n64 wrote:
An excellent thread on Helios lenses.
I picked this really scruffy copy of a Helios 44-2 up today at a car boot sale. It was not attached to any camera, although the seller did have a Zenit B with a Helios 44-2 attached to it (1971 if my memory serves me correct).
This one though was in very grubby condition. I haven't been in long, but after a quick clean I thought I would post a couple of pictures of this Helios 44-2. So is it pre 1970/71
8 iris blades
White writing
N00145XX (last 2 digits replaced)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
See page 1 of the thread... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zelda_n64
Joined: 26 Aug 2011 Posts: 163 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zelda_n64 wrote:
TAo2, Thank you!!
TAo2 wrote: |
See page 1 of the thread... |
Not sure how I missed that as I read the whole thread before posting:
44-2 model 1.a.v1: KMZ black glossy paint + white lettering, sn "N00xxxxx" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I have purchased this Helios-44 lens, although do not yet have it in hand. I wanted a 13 blade version, which it is, but otherwise it does not appear to be anything different from what has already been posted. M39.
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
semaca
Joined: 23 Apr 2014 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2014 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
semaca wrote:
Yesterday I have bought a Helios 44-2, i think it's from '74, but I don't understand one thing. When the red dot from the aperture ring is at f/2 the aperture is actually at f/16, it's fully closed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
It's always like that on Helios 44, don't worry. That's not a problem, it's just another way to see the preset system _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leorimkus
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
leorimkus wrote:
semaca wrote: |
Yesterday I have bought a Helios 44-2, i think it's from '74, but I don't understand one thing. When the red dot from the aperture ring is at f/2 the aperture is actually at f/16, it's fully closed. |
Hi
This lens has twin aperture rings - the other is right in front from the one You are talking about. It has aperture values written on it. You should set the desired aperture value with the front ring, focus with the second one opened and close it only before the shot. The front ring limits how much aperture is closed with the second ring. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FujiXT1
Joined: 19 Jun 2014 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:21 pm Post subject: Helios 44M Brass ring model 8 blades set outward |
|
|
FujiXT1 wrote:
I have never seen this model. Is it ok that 8 blades are set outward? Never seen before.
P1050309 by Nobody Mess With Suburbans, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robiles
Joined: 26 Jan 2014 Posts: 5 Location: Deva, Romania
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 2:42 pm Post subject: Helios 44 m39, 13 blades |
|
|
robiles wrote:
Hi, i recently bought a Helios 44, m39 mount with 13 blades, sn 0031303 from a flea market, in a not so good condition, but at a really reasonable price.
I do not have an adapter, but i was able to change the lens mount with one from a helios 44-2 that i had around, until i get the adapter. I also had to clean and lube it, clean the glass from a lot of dirt and dust, but it is all done now.
I noticed that it had that really cool looking blue/purple coating, but also that thru the viewfinder everything is yellow-ish. Is that normal? The wather is bad here unfortunately, but when it improves, i will add some samples. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Just bought a Helios 44 No. 0000xxx Π
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/HELIOS-44-lens-F2-58mm-f-M39-ZENIT-USSR-KMZ-BIOTAR-13-BLADES-1960-0000880-RED-P-/311164957211
Quote: |
- KMZ
- silver, Π, "5,8cm", sn "N°000xxx", 13-blades, f/22 - rare
- silver, Π, "5,8cm", sn "N°00xxx", 13-blades, f/16 - rare
- silver, "2/58", sn "N°0xxx" or "N°00xxx", 13 blades
- silver, "2/58", sn "N°0xxx", 8-blades
- black + white lettering, "2/58", sn "N0xxx", 8 blades
- black + white lettering, M42, "2/58", sn "N0xxx", 8 blades
|
Mine appears to predate the 1a or it's just a lower serial number.
The one I posted about earlier with the bad flare, was a 1b. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
Cool! That's high price, but collectible, so...
I think all 000 and lower are from the same year of production (but yes, yours is earlier in the year).
Btw, I wonder if Helios 44 for start and for zenit follow the same production numbering... (a H44 for start with 000 is from the same year than H44 000 for zenit?) . _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
Finaly solved the mystery around my Silver helios 44
The mystery was : The serial number doesn't fit to this lens. If this is KMZ, this lens should have been built in 1950, which is not possible. But it is not MMZ, because it's not MMZ logo, and MMZ never made H-44 with Red P and focal in cm.
So, after discussion with someone working for KMZ, it appears that this lens is kind of rare "hybride" from KMZ and MMZ. In 1965, MMZ started the production of H-44 in order to support KMZ. So, KMZ sent to MMZ some machines, documations and few not finished lens in order to start from something, and get used to machines. My H-44 is certainly one of those lens that were sent from KMZ to MMZ. The lens was started in KMZ, they engraved the name ring, but not the serial number, because the lens was not finished. MMZ finished it and engraved their serial number "a la MMZ". This information looks to be confirmed by the fact that the SN of my lens is the lower he saw from MMZ Helios-44.
Undirectly, it also show that in 1965 (or 1964), KMZ was still doing Helios-44 with SN 00xxxxx , because the red P and cm disappeared during the 00 production (there are some 00 with red P, other 00 (latest) without red P... and no 0xxxx exist with red P). _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|