View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Humulus
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 130 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Humulus wrote:
Today I purchased an unusual Helios-44M-5. I've never encountered any Vilejka made Helioses before
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fotografiasol
Joined: 15 Dec 2013 Posts: 64 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 4:19 pm Post subject: When the Vilejka made Helios was made? |
|
|
fotografiasol wrote:
Humulus wrote: |
Today I purchased an unusual Helios-44M-5. I've never encountered any Vilejka made Helioses before
|
Yes, they are seen in a very little number. Please, could you tell us the year your Vilejka made Helios was made? Thank you. _________________ fotografiasol
Last edited by fotografiasol on Mon Jan 05, 2015 4:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tmry
Joined: 05 Jan 2015 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 4:23 pm Post subject: Helios 40-2 |
|
|
tmry wrote:
...
Last edited by tmry on Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Humulus
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 130 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:09 pm Post subject: Re: When the Vilejka made Helios was made? |
|
|
Humulus wrote:
fotografiasol wrote: |
Please, could you tell us the year your Vilejka made Helios was made? Thank you. |
1997 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fotografiasol
Joined: 15 Dec 2013 Posts: 64 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:48 am Post subject: Re: When the Vilejka made Helios was made? |
|
|
fotografiasol wrote:
Humulus wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Please, could you tell us the year your Vilejka made Helios was made? Thank you. |
1997 |
Thank You! Please, can somebody explain why the Vilejka plant without a tradition of making Helios-44 manufactured at last a very little number of them so lately? _________________ fotografiasol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 5:11 pm Post subject: Re: When the Vilejka made Helios was made? |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
fotografiasol wrote: |
Humulus wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Please, could you tell us the year your Vilejka made Helios was made? Thank you. |
1997 |
Thank You! Please, can somebody explain why the Vilejka plant without a tradition of making Helios-44 manufactured at last a very little number of them so lately? |
Hi FGF,
MMZ and Vilejka merged around 1970 and became BELOMO.
They continued using their own logos on Zenit/Helios products, along with the original branding. Probably, simply tae use up stocks. Their photographic products were mainly aimed at home markets, so maybe an added distinguishing logo so that buyers would recognise export from local products. Since the home products were always perceived (in later years) as inferior.
Ah think Zenit cameras/equipment are still made in the original Vilejka plant. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:53 pm Post subject: Re: When the Vilejka made Helios was made? |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
TAo2 wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Humulus wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Please, could you tell us the year your Vilejka made Helios was made? Thank you. |
1997 |
Thank You! Please, can somebody explain why the Vilejka plant without a tradition of making Helios-44 manufactured at last a very little number of them so lately? |
Hi FGF,
MMZ and Vilejka merged around 1970 and became BELOMO.
They continued using their own logos on Zenit/Helios products, along with the original branding. Probably, simply tae use up stocks. Their photographic products were mainly aimed at home markets, so maybe an added distinguishing logo so that buyers would recognise export from local products. Since the home products were always perceived (in later years) as inferior.
Ah think Zenit cameras/equipment are still made in the original Vilejka plant. |
I'm not sure about it, there were a lot of legal problem between them and KMZ... and on BeLOMO site there isn't any camera. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fotografiasol
Joined: 15 Dec 2013 Posts: 64 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:38 am Post subject: Re: When the Vilejka made Helios was made? |
|
|
fotografiasol wrote:
TAo2 wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Humulus wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Please, could you tell us the year your Vilejka made Helios was made? Thank you. |
1997 |
Thank You! Please, can somebody explain why the Vilejka plant without a tradition of making Helios-44 manufactured at last a very little number of them so lately? |
Hi FGF,
MMZ and Vilejka merged around 1970 and became BELOMO.
They continued using their own logos on Zenit/Helios products, along with the original branding. Probably, simply tae use up stocks. Their photographic products were mainly aimed at home markets, so maybe an added distinguishing logo so that buyers would recognise export from local products. Since the home products were always perceived (in later years) as inferior.
Ah think Zenit cameras/equipment are still made in the original Vilejka plant. |
Thank you for your answer. I'm also not sure. The problem is I never saw a Vileyka made Helios until I see this 44-M5 from 1997. And this Helios does not look like any MMZ made Helios, instaed it looks 100% like a Valdai made 44-M5. _________________ fotografiasol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:10 am Post subject: Re: When the Vilejka made Helios was made? |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
fotografiasol wrote: |
TAo2 wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Humulus wrote: |
fotografiasol wrote: |
Please, could you tell us the year your Vilejka made Helios was made? Thank you. |
1997 |
Thank You! Please, can somebody explain why the Vilejka plant without a tradition of making Helios-44 manufactured at last a very little number of them so lately? |
Hi FGF,
MMZ and Vilejka merged around 1970 and became BELOMO.
They continued using their own logos on Zenit/Helios products, along with the original branding. Probably, simply tae use up stocks. Their photographic products were mainly aimed at home markets, so maybe an added distinguishing logo so that buyers would recognise export from local products. Since the home products were always perceived (in later years) as inferior.
Ah think Zenit cameras/equipment are still made in the original Vilejka plant. |
Thank you for your answer. I'm also not sure. The problem is I never saw a Vileyka made Helios until I see this 44-M5 from 1997. And this Helios does not look like any MMZ made Helios, instaed it looks 100% like a Valdai made 44-M5. |
Ah know that Zenit 130s were made in Vilejka, so that takes them intae the 21st C. at least. Mebbe no camera production now.
The Helios lens is likely (as said above) a Valdai product, since they made lenses for Belomo for years after that company was formed. Ah think the Vilejka symbol was used as mentioned above. FSU cameras and lenses had been branded like that throughout their history - e.g. FED branded Industar lenses.
If it was easy tae work out, this thread would've lasted around 3 pages... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nero299
Joined: 01 Mar 2015 Posts: 1 Location: Indiana, US
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:29 pm Post subject: More about this lens? |
|
|
Nero299 wrote:
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
Last edited by Nero299 on Sun Mar 01, 2015 5:49 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7568 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:35 pm Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Nero299 wrote: |
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
|
_________________ https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
With the way production of the 44 moved around so much, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that MMZ was ordered to produce the 44-2 in 76 just to keep the factory busy. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Humulus
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 130 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Humulus wrote:
I did some research and it seems that the rare Vilejka Helios-44M-5 was one of kit lenses for the ZENIT 130 camera (together with Valdai Helios-44M-5 with new barrel design and Valdai Helios-44M-4) manufactured in Belarus in the late nineties. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:10 am Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
Nero299 wrote: |
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
|
|
MMZ was still producing the 44-2 in 1976.
Well, this lens was not produced in 1976 because the serial number system of MMZ is different. Important here is the first digit (7). So the lens was produced in 1977. MMZ then tried to make their "own" Helios-44, the Helios-44-3, since 1980. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:30 am Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
calvin83 wrote: |
Nero299 wrote: |
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
|
|
MMZ was still producing the 44-2 in 1976.
Well, this lens was not produced in 1976 because the serial number system of MMZ is different. Important here is the first digit (7). So the lens was produced in 1977. MMZ then tried to make their "own" Helios-44, the Helios-44-3, since 1980. |
No, it is 1976, first 2 digits are the year on MMZ lenses since 1971/2. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 10:23 am Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
TAo2 wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
calvin83 wrote: |
Nero299 wrote: |
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
|
|
MMZ was still producing the 44-2 in 1976.
Well, this lens was not produced in 1976 because the serial number system of MMZ is different. Important here is the first digit (7). So the lens was produced in 1977. MMZ then tried to make their "own" Helios-44, the Helios-44-3, since 1980. |
No, it is 1976, first 2 digits are the year on MMZ lenses since 1971/2. |
From what I read on zenitcamera, which is quite faithfull source, it isn't :
"У объективов Гелиос-44-2 производства ММЗ 1969 г. и 1970-х годов был тот же способ нумерации (соответственно, объектив с номером 5012345 — здесь выпуска 1975 года)."
from : http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-serialnumbers.html#n3
It tells that Helios-44-2 made in MMZ in 1969 and 70's still use the usualy MMZ sn system (exemple is given).
Maybe you misunderstand with Valdai (Jupiter optiks) H-44-2? _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
TAo2 wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
calvin83 wrote: |
Nero299 wrote: |
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
|
|
MMZ was still producing the 44-2 in 1976.
Well, this lens was not produced in 1976 because the serial number system of MMZ is different. Important here is the first digit (7). So the lens was produced in 1977. MMZ then tried to make their "own" Helios-44, the Helios-44-3, since 1980. |
No, it is 1976, first 2 digits are the year on MMZ lenses since 1971/2. |
From what I read on zenitcamera, which is quite faithfull source, it isn't :
"У объективов Гелиос-44-2 производства ММЗ 1969 г. и 1970-х годов был тот же способ нумерации (соответственно, объектив с номером 5012345 — здесь выпуска 1975 года)."
from : http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-serialnumbers.html#n3
It tells that Helios-44-2 made in MMZ in 1969 and 70's still use the usualy MMZ sn system (exemple is given).
Maybe you misunderstand with Valdai (Jupiter optiks) H-44-2? |
No BM, the translation is Helios 44-2, made in MMZ in 1969 and 70 not 70s. As I said, from 1971 MMZ used the first 2 digits of the s/n (as all other manufacturers) allowing for old stock etc.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:38 pm Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
TAo2 wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
TAo2 wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
calvin83 wrote: |
Nero299 wrote: |
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
|
|
MMZ was still producing the 44-2 in 1976.
Well, this lens was not produced in 1976 because the serial number system of MMZ is different. Important here is the first digit (7). So the lens was produced in 1977. MMZ then tried to make their "own" Helios-44, the Helios-44-3, since 1980. |
No, it is 1976, first 2 digits are the year on MMZ lenses since 1971/2. |
From what I read on zenitcamera, which is quite faithfull source, it isn't :
"У объективов Гелиос-44-2 производства ММЗ 1969 г. и 1970-х годов был тот же способ нумерации (соответственно, объектив с номером 5012345 — здесь выпуска 1975 года)."
from : http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-serialnumbers.html#n3
It tells that Helios-44-2 made in MMZ in 1969 and 70's still use the usualy MMZ sn system (exemple is given).
Maybe you misunderstand with Valdai (Jupiter optiks) H-44-2? |
No BM, the translation is Helios 44-2, made in MMZ in 1969 and 70 not 70s. As I said, from 1971 MMZ used the first 2 digits of the s/n (as all other manufacturers) allowing for old stock etc.
|
It's not that big deal, but 70x mean that it's not only 70, and all the 70's. Also the exemple given is pretty clear : if serial is 5012345, then it's 1975. First digit is 5, so even in 1975, the first digit rule ruled. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:24 am Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
TAo2 wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
TAo2 wrote: |
BurstMox wrote: |
calvin83 wrote: |
Nero299 wrote: |
Can someone tell me a bit more about this lens that I purchased? I've read through here and it doesn't seem to match up with the dates that MMZ manufactured the 44-2, but it has their logo and a serial starting with 76. Any help would be appreciated!
My picture isn't uploading, but the description in my message is accurate, MMZ logo, 76 serial, on a 44-2.
|
|
MMZ was still producing the 44-2 in 1976.
Well, this lens was not produced in 1976 because the serial number system of MMZ is different. Important here is the first digit (7). So the lens was produced in 1977. MMZ then tried to make their "own" Helios-44, the Helios-44-3, since 1980. |
No, it is 1976, first 2 digits are the year on MMZ lenses since 1971/2. |
From what I read on zenitcamera, which is quite faithfull source, it isn't :
"У объективов Гелиос-44-2 производства ММЗ 1969 г. и 1970-х годов был тот же способ нумерации (соответственно, объектив с номером 5012345 — здесь выпуска 1975 года)."
from : http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-serialnumbers.html#n3
It tells that Helios-44-2 made in MMZ in 1969 and 70's still use the usualy MMZ sn system (exemple is given).
Maybe you misunderstand with Valdai (Jupiter optiks) H-44-2? |
No BM, the translation is Helios 44-2, made in MMZ in 1969 and 70 not 70s. As I said, from 1971 MMZ used the first 2 digits of the s/n (as all other manufacturers) allowing for old stock etc.
|
It's not that big deal, but 70x mean that it's not only 70, and all the 70's. Also the exemple given is pretty clear : if serial is 5012345, then it's 1975. First digit is 5, so even in 1975, the first digit rule ruled. |
Well BM, Calvin's asking for info on his lens, the info is...MMZ followed KMZ'S S/N.There was a brief hiatus in 1969/70, when both[i] KMZ and MMZ change their system (coinciding with MMZ becoming Belomo). Lenses beginning with 9 were made in 196[b]9[/b] - lenses beginning with 0 were made in 1970.
Under the old system, if a lens from KMZ or MMZ begins with 5 it was made in 196[b]5[/b]. From 1971, both KMZ and Belomo (MMZ) used the two digits of the year as the first two digits of the S/N . eg 71xxx - 1971, 76xxx - 1976. Ah can't be any clearer than that. That is the correct sequence... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:45 am Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
TAo2 wrote: |
Well BM, Calvin's asking for info on his lens, the info is...MMZ followed KMZ'S S/N.There was a brief hiatus in 1969/70, when both[i] KMZ and MMZ change their system (coinciding with MMZ becoming Belomo). Lenses beginning with 9 were made in 196[b]9[/b] - lenses beginning with 0 were made in 1970.
Under the old system, if a lens from KMZ or MMZ begins with 5 it was made in 196[b]5[/b]. From 1971, both KMZ and Belomo (MMZ) used the two digits of the year as the first two digits of the S/N . eg 71xxx - 1971, 76xxx - 1976. Ah can't be any clearer than that. That is the correct sequence... |
What you say is clear, but that doesn't mean that it's true . Zenitcamera says the opposite (lens made in 1975 used the old 1 digit system). Btw, what is your source? _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Humulus
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 130 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Humulus wrote:
I believe you both might have fallen victim to the infamous Soviet disinformation campaign |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:05 pm Post subject: Re: More about this lens? |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
BurstMox wrote: |
TAo2 wrote: |
Well BM, Calvin's asking for info on his lens, the info is...MMZ followed KMZ'S S/N.There was a brief hiatus in 1969/70, when both[i] KMZ and MMZ change their system (coinciding with MMZ becoming Belomo). Lenses beginning with 9 were made in 196[b]9[/b] - lenses beginning with 0 were made in 1970.
Under the old system, if a lens from KMZ or MMZ begins with 5 it was made in 196[b]5[/b]. From 1971, both KMZ and Belomo (MMZ) used the two digits of the year as the first two digits of the S/N . eg 71xxx - 1971, 76xxx - 1976. Ah can't be any clearer than that. That is the correct sequence... |
What you say is clear, but that doesn't mean that it's true . Zenitcamera says the opposite (lens made in 1975 used the old 1 digit system). Btw, what is your source? |
Hi BM,
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TAo2
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Posts: 319 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TAo2 wrote:
Humulus wrote: |
I believe you both might have fallen victim to the infamous Soviet disinformation campaign |
Hi Humulus,
The guy's Czech... As ah said before, if this was easy, there'd only be 3 pages |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Humulus
Joined: 23 Sep 2014 Posts: 130 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Humulus wrote:
Just bought myself another Vilejka Helios-44M-5. This time with a nice serial number starting with '0000'. The Zenit body (Vilejka Zenit 130) it was attached to was manufactured in 1998. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fotografiasol
Joined: 15 Dec 2013 Posts: 64 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotografiasol wrote:
Humulus wrote: |
Just bought myself another Vilejka Helios-44M-5. This time with a nice serial number starting with '0000'. The Zenit body (Vilejka Zenit 130) it was attached to was manufactured in 1998. |
Congratulations! Please, show us pictures of the lens and camera. Thank you. _________________ fotografiasol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|